DOES IEO PROTECT BOUNTY HUNTERS ?

[FoBoT]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

[ytaevv]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

To participate in projects that conduct IEOs is safer than those that conduct ICO. By the way, tomorrow startsat the project Gexan, they also launched airdrop.

[badykvik]

I also support ytaevv idea, because most ICO always promises what they cannot afford to pay and refuse to pay at the end of the program, some will even runaway with the investors funds without implementing their project.
IEO appears to be safer though only time shall tell.

[CryptoBry]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely. Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

We are assuming that with IEO as opposed to the usual ICO the tokens has no need to look for any exchange since the crowdsale is already there, there is lesser chance that a project can go scam or just fail and never able to reach the exchange (based on our experiences with many ICOs in the past). I am then wishing that STOs will be using the IEO route too so we can have the advantages of both platforms.

[sunsilk]

Are there bounties now that mainly focuses with IEO? I don't think that even the bounty hunters are protected by these IEOs. For investors, yes they can be secured through IEO but it doesn't guarantee anything for the bounty hunters.

I also support ytaevv idea, because most ICO always promises what they cannot afford to pay and refuse to pay at the end of the program, some will even runaway with the investors funds without implementing their project.
IEO appears to be safer though only time shall tell.

Many ICO bounty ran from their participants but so far with IEO bounty, I haven't seen one existing today. I mean, I haven't seen a bounty that promotes IEO.

[Bohdan Rabeha]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

I participated in many bounty campaigns of ICO projects in 2018. Of these, there are several projects that have paid me part of the rewards or did not pay anything to me and now several such projects are being conducted by IEO. They promise me to pay the full reward after IEO. Frankly speaking, the teams of these projects are public and actively conduct social networks. I got some trust from them because bounty went great.

It is important to understand that when IEO project goes to exchange and his tokens begin to be traded and i not have tokens yet, then most likely i will sell these tokens at the lowest price.

Therefore, i like STO projects more than ever because they are subject to regulators.

[CLywaTeLb]

Nothing hinders projects doing IEO to delay distribution for bounty hunters. As it was before, distribution can be realized when the price is ridiculous.
It would be more correct to hope for the progress of the projects so that the assets receive security due to the demand.
I sincerely hope that in the foreseeable future there will be at least a few more projects that will work stably, and the demand for their assets will be provided with fundamental reasons.

[CoinEraser]

In my opinion, it makes no difference whether IEO or ICO. If the project does not pay the bounty participants, an IEO does not change anything about it. So I wouldn't rely on it. An IEO guarantees that the token will really be traded on an exchange afterwards, but if bounty participants weren't paid, it won't do them any good.  

[Yamifoud]

We are still in assuming that IEO would give better than of ICO, but never have any assurance that they will give of what they promise to the Bounty hunters. If a certain IEO project will have a successful end,  may we think that bounty hunter will be profitable as well as investors.  

[Muzika]

With the concept of IEO we can say that it protects the bounty hunters because it can give them an assurance that the coin is already listed but somehow it can also be a trap since the team can make their coins delisted and in the end the bounty hunters can be again a victim.

[pey]

There is no interest in protecting the interest of the bounty hunters and there are so many bounty hunters which will still work for such campaigns. You can protect yourself by not participating in those campaigns.

[Coin_trader]

There is no interest in protecting the interest of the bounty hunters and there are so many bounty hunters which will still work for such campaigns. You can protect yourself by not participating in those campaigns.

What projects and exchanges matter is the investors, bounty hunters needs to protect their self by studying the project to really earn from it as time passes by.

[novaprime]

We are still in assuming that IEO would give better than of ICO, but never have any assurance that they will give of what they promise to the Bounty hunters. If a certain IEO project will have a successful end,  may we think that bounty hunter will be profitable as well as investors.  

I agree with you . If the IEO project is sold out within a short period of time, the bounty participants will earn a huge amount of money but very few projects can do it because if it is a good exchange, they will not need marketing strategy. I think in the near future many large projects will have a clearer development strategy and will definitely need bounty hunters to be able to serve the purpose of the project.

[carter34]

There is no interest in protecting the interest of the bounty hunters and there are so many bounty hunters which will still work for such campaigns. You can protect yourself by not participating in those campaigns.

I understand your point of view. Really, there is no protection from the bounty one is involved in because the developers are interested only in their project, the money they have invested in and money to get. Therefore, is better to work with a bounty that will deliver but the issue is that IEO is better than ICO for bounty hunters.

[SMOKEU]

it does have the guarantee to protect hunters but not 100%, as it's still depends on the dev team if they will give the reward or not.. some campaign are paying by dividing it through monthly distribution 

[acholagi]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

the question is whether most IEOs currently use bounty hunters to get promotions? I don't think so and it's the same as we won't get a job from the IEO. Indeed this is a choice

[TopT3ns]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

I think if related to bounty, IEO almost same with ICO. Because it rules and anything else that related to it is decided by developer and bounty manager. But maybe because of hype, we bounty hunter wouldn't worry if project scam or not.

[cepot9]

IEO, ICO, STO seems like they don't protect bounty hunters except BM or bounty manager who holds the bounty, so seeing a good bounty manager will keep us from avoiding paying projects. because usually a smart BM will first escrow a token or money to be paid for a bounty hunter

[Voevodin]

Most members of this forum have participated in one bounty or the other and must have been shocked by the project team either by not paying them, payment reduced to $0 after 16 weeks of hard job or the token/coin does not get listed or the project is a scam entirely.

Can we now agree that the IEO projects will protect the interests of the bounty hunters ?

To participate in projects that conduct IEOs is safer than those that conduct ICO. By the way, tomorrow startsat the project Gexan, they also launched airdrop.

This is good. Here are the terms https://lottery.gexan.io

[Gozie51]

The whole of the discussion is that bounty hunters need to research before they enter a bounty and some managers too who are trusted can be followed because at the end, the manager will want to follow up and ensure that tokens are distributed to avoid being neg.