Bitcointalk gang - re-opened

[marlboroza]

I've read this post:

Anyone else notice the new way these DT1 members are shutting down conversation that doesn't benefit their gang? Simply call the other person a liar or a hypocrite.
The average user just reads this and automatically believes it to be true because the people they look up to are the ones saying it.
But they want forgiveness for their friends.

..and I tried to search for this gang but couldn't find it anywhere.

Calling teeGUMES to use this thread to write down all gang members they speak of, we need to know who are all members which are part of this gang.

Archived http://archive.is/sQJbQ
Local rules: Only teeGUMES is allowed to post here.

As teeGUMES decided it is best to put me on ignore https://archive.fo/oX67I and OGnasty merited off topic reply, I will remove this local rule. I hope they didn't put zorroback on ignore for the same reason
So far there are 3 members of this so called gang they are talking about, according to bitcoinsupremo:

you , Lauda and TMAN

[teeGUMES]

Based on your previous replies to me I chose to exercise my right with the ignore button yesterday. I feel as though I lose nothing of importance by having your posts not show up. This won't change now or any time soon.

Edit to add: marlboroza was one of the four members of bitcointalk that decided a public doxxing was a meritable post.

[zorrobek]

I've read this post:

Anyone else notice the new way these DT1 members are shutting down conversation that doesn't benefit their gang? Simply call the other person a liar or a hypocrite.
The average user just reads this and automatically believes it to be true because the people they look up to are the ones saying it.
But they want forgiveness for their friends.

..and I tried to search for this gang but couldn't find it anywhere.

Calling teeGUMES to use this thread to write down all gang members they speak of, I need to know who are all members which are part of this gang.

Archived http://archive.is/sQJbQ
Local rules: Only teeGUMES is allowed to post here.

Based on your previous replies to me I chose to exercise my right with the ignore button yesterday. I feel as though I lose nothing of importance by having your posts not show up. This won't change now or any time soon.

That doesn't explain what you said.

Edit to add: marlboroza was one of the four members of bitcointalk that decided a public doxxing was a meritable post.

What a bad attempt to move topic in different direction. Your new DT member folks. Calling people gang, when faced with it putting people on ignore.

Who is gang?

[xolxol]

gang isnt the right word,its mafia and you know yourself you are one of them,haha.
thats a facepalm for you, ignored by teeGUMEs so its sad 

[marlboroza]

gang isnt the right word,its mafia and you know yourself you are one of them,haha.

Who is capo dei capi?

[BitcoinSupremo]

gang isnt the right word,its mafia and you know yourself you are one of them,haha.

Who is capo dei capi?

Don't you ever think you deserve that title, you are just a fucked up pile of toilet paper "il capo dei capi" uses as toilet paper for cleaning himself up.
You are just an idiot who have been given too much power and used and abused that all over the place. You still remain a toilet paper though.
Go ahead delete this post as you do always.

[marlboroza]

Don't you ever think you deserve that title, you are just a fucked up pile of toilet paper "il capo dei capi" uses as toilet paper for cleaning himself up.
You are just an idiot who have been given too much power and used and abused that all over the place. You still remain a toilet paper though.
Go ahead delete this post as you do always.

So who is the gang?

[BitcoinSupremo]

Don't you ever think you deserve that title, you are just a fucked up pile of toilet paper "il capo dei capi" uses as toilet paper for cleaning himself up.
You are just an idiot who have been given too much power and used and abused that all over the place. You still remain a toilet paper though.
Go ahead delete this post as you do always.

So who is the gang?

For me I have no doubt, all the communist lobby bullshit propaganda, for me it is you , Lauda and TMAN as the most dangerous communists of the forum 

[marlboroza]

So who is the gang?

For me I have no doubt, all the communist lobby bullshit propaganda, for me it is you , Lauda and TMAN as the most dangerous communists of the forum  

Well, that looks like very small gang if you ask me. Thank you for your valuable opinion, I will update topic with this "information". Hm... just one more thing before I update topic, who is The-One-Above-All ?

Archived http://archive.is/RrdtA#selection-3885.0-3885.1

[BitcoinSupremo]

Don't know but 12 PM almost so off to sleep. By the way I have archived it before you have done here it is the link

http://archive.is/5IkDH

[TalkStar]

For me I have no doubt, all the communist lobby bullshit propaganda, for me it is you , Lauda and TMAN as the most dangerous communists of the forum  

Dangerous for whom?
I don't think that they are dangerous for bitcointalk community users but yeah scammers and fraudulent persons have got fear about them.

Isn't it looking good to you dude?

[marlboroza]

~

She/he is just pissed. First I got negative from him/her, then she/he changed it to neutral, then positive, then negative, then removed old negative and placed new one, seems like she/he can't make up her/his mind. Probably whoever left correct feedback on her/his wall is part of the gang.

Locking this for now.

[yahoo62278]

Even though I think a poll would be heavily diluted, I wouldn't mind seeing the results of a poll. Is there a "gang" yes or no.

[marlboroza]

Well, first we have to determine who is part of the gang. Without "gang" members, someone might wrongly interpret meaning of poll "is there a gang" and vote "yes" for the other "gang" 

[yahoo62278]

Well, first we have to determine who is part of the gang. Without "gang" members, someone might wrongly interpret meaning of poll "is there a gang" and vote "yes" for the other "gang" 

Maybe there are multiple gangs. The bitcointalk bloods and the bitcointalk crypts?

[suchmoon]

Maybe there are multiple gangs. The bitcointalk bloods and the bitcointalk crypts?

Foxes and cats.

[teeGUMES]

Whats going on here? Did you quote your alt to try to get around my use of the Ignore button?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17080768#msg17080768
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067579#msg17067579

[marlboroza]

Whats going on here? Did you quote your alt to try to get around my use of the Ignore button?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17080768#msg17080768
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067579#msg17067579

I would reply to you but you won't see post.

[marlboroza]

Guess I'm officially part of the gang now.

Guess what? I am part of moderation "gang" now.
Oh. OH:



Calls people a gang to start a conflict then hides behind IGNORE button to "de-escalate things" which they started.
Goes off topic.
Doesn't know what to respond to shit they wrote so IGNORE button and negative tag is best solution for this.
Doesn't tag "the other account".
Continues to post off topic replies, even thought they have OP on ignore, without addressing main question - WHO are gang members they are speaking of?

[marlboroza]

~

OK, I guess you are part of the "gang" now. New member of the "gang" is Owlcatz, according to BitcoinSupremo

Unfortunately that was the case as another friend of the gang gave me another non valid feedback. [...]

owlcatz [...]

I will update thread when I find more of these "gang" members.
On side note, Mr. Ignore Button's post has been removed because they simple can't stay on topic. Sorry nutildah, yours too, we don't want anyone to accuse us of being gang, don't we?

And what is very interesting is this:

Thanks for reminding me that I forgot to tag your other account

teeGUMES wouldn't lie that they have me on IGNORE, did they read my previous reply where I said:

"Doesn't tag "the other account."

They wouldn't do it after my post, right?

I am really not sure what teeGUMES think with this:

He then proceeded in misspelling his name and talking like they were two different people having a conversation in the reference link.

This is link in reference(teeGUMES's quote is removed):

I would reply to you but you won't see post.

I am having very hard time to find where I have misspelled my name, considering that I am IGNORED teeGUMES wouldn't see it if that is posted in topic, as they put me on ignore a day before I started this thread.


Don't play mind games with me teeGUMES, you have big mouth and I just caught you lying.