[HELP] distribution of tokens

[raonysantos]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

[Bitlover10]

Their are so many coins we saw in past that when it's list on exchange people start dumping it. In my understanding project owners can do something for price is not going down after Exchange listing
1 Don't allocated so much coins for bounty hunters
2 Donts give so much refferal bonus
3 Don't spend so much coins on marketing
4 Don't allocated so much coins for dev team
5 If possible then released bounty token after 6 months of exchange listing. But they should be declared that terms in the beginning otherwise its create fud about the project.
6 Keep updating community about latest updates
7 Choose good exchange for coin listing

So overall it's dependent on the project owners too that how they handle their community and makes community to trust their project.

[DdmrDdmr]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

The main way to avoid a high dumping rate on the exchanges is to have a project that has real substance to it, meaning by that that the concept is solid, the utility proven or clearly inferred, the project progress and deliveries contrastable, team is competent and implicated, token allocation is not excessively concentrated on team and bounties, and so on. In other words, that token holders really believe they are holding tokens that are going to have a clear price increase to holders, or personal utility at a lower price.

I have seen in the past some ICOs offering a token bonus to the ICO token purchasers if they held all/most of their token in their wallets for a certain amount of time after token distribution (same original wallet address, typically ERC-20 type tokens).

[BitBustah]

^ Usecase and real development has shown to have little effect on prices.  We have shitcoins in the top 10.  The sad truth is its really just about hype and marketing.

[raonysantos]

^ Usecase and real development has shown to have little effect on prices.  We have shitcoins in the top 10.  The sad truth is its really just about hype and marketing.

I am developing an educational product and I am afraid to disappoint, so I enter into so much debate about what to bring out the best, but you speak a truth 

[erikalui]

Some bounty campaigns have been managed very well wherein they distribute tokens in portions (percentages) and this keeps the participants happy as well as doesn't affect the token price much. Also, some campaigns have allocated ETH instead of their tokens to make the token price stable like Exchange Union. They offer huge amounts in ETH and till today the token price is pretty stable.

As the market today is really bad, distributing the tokens after months of listing them on exchanges won't be worth as with/without bounty programs, the token's price reduces as even investors turn to P&D.

Now projects have started swapping their tokens so I feel it's another way of helping their token's price.

[r1s2g3]

I think the main reason of dump is that no one is doing the fair evaluation of the project worth. With a website and whitepaper project raises million+ dollars and in the end did not able to deliver that make value of project equal to million+ dollars. Here the dump of token starts.

[okala]

Their are so many coins we saw in past that when it's list on exchange people start dumping it. In my understanding project owners can do something for price is not going down after Exchange listing
1 Don't allocated so much coins for bounty hunters
2 Donts give so much refferal bonus
3 Don't spend so much coins on marketing
4 Don't allocated so much coins for dev team
5 If possible then released bounty token after 6 months of exchange listing. But they should be declared that terms in the beginning otherwise its create fud about the project.
6 Keep updating community about latest updates
7 Choose good exchange for coin listing

So overall it's dependent on the project owners too that how they handle their community and makes community to trust their project.

Either ways the token will eventually get dump not only by bounty hunters but by even investors who gain huge bonuses on they bought tokens, I think the best way is for team to have buy back policy where the project owners buy back token after launch in that way they have all token back and then can do proper management.

[feryjhie]

5 If possible then released bounty token after 6 months of exchange listing. But they should be declared that terms in the beginning otherwise its create fud about the project.
6 Keep updating community about latest updates
7 Choose good exchange for coin listing

5. IMO the bounty release time usually not the one that caused the price of the token down, usually it because of the investor that gaining huge bonuses.
6. yeah, more importantly, is the dev should keep updating the roadmap because if the dev does not update it maybe the investor will left and dump their coins

[r1a2y3m4]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

If you don't want a massive dumping of your tokens in exchange, you better be delay the distribution for the bounty hunters. Most bounty hunters are hungry for the tokens you might give to them. That's why it is best for you not to give the bounty hunters their tokens after the ICO was conducted, delay it a month or two.

[khaled0111]

I am sure you are talking about the dump that usually happens after paying bounty hunters!
You should not be afraid of such dump as it is not going to last for long time.
In fact, it is a good thing as you are going to get rid of them and there will remain only those who believe in your project (if it is good enough).

As it is going to be 1 or 2℅ of total supply so it won't be a big problem.

Also, you can run a buyback program or pay them in ETH.

[Thirdspace]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

1 Don't allocated so much coins for bounty hunters

token dumping after ICO is inevitable specially if you distribute large portion as reward for bounties
actually it shouldn't matter to your project, if you have real and solid developments
you need to build trust, by having a good future plan and completing in timely manner
if they believe your project will be successful, they will keep holding to their tokens

dev team should keep as minimal amount of tokens as possible in the beginning
periodically, use portion of your project's profit to buy back tokens and distribute as dividends
when your tokens has real function and value tied to your project,
people tend to hold it longer and its value will rise following your project's progress and success

[jademaxsuy]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

Well for the good of the project, a team should not allow any issuance or selling of tokens either from the bounty hunter or from the investors/contributors unless the project had been working out already. Though it may take some time but it is the best way to keep the token value and.will.not be undervalued.

In some.cases marketing the token has also a way so that tokens will not get undervalued like listing it to good exchanges like binance and other top 10 exchanges. Aside from that if the team offers buy back for the coins then that would be pretty good for the tokens not to be dumped by bounty hunters and investors.

[Jpti]

First of all you have a real and good goals. Your project must be different from others as the market has enough of projects with similar goals. Project team should be strong and reputed. And you project should be able to convince investors. Others are do not give a huge amount of bonus (investors will visit you if you have a good project). Do not provide huge amounts of tokens under referral and bounty campaigns.

[Pffrt]

First of all, it depends on the project itself. If your project is a good one, I doubt anyone will dump.
An example of good distribution can be which I have learnt from VENA bounty distribution-
Vena has decided to distribute the token after 3 months of listing although they didn't announce at the beginning. However, they are distributing in 3 phase, in each phase, participant will receive their 1/3 of the tokens. The phase is done once a month.

[Shatterlean22]

The most annoying mistakes developers do with there tokens is the huge presale bonuses which ultimately will drag down the token price instantly when the chance is created by token price ,the profit will be enough for all presale investors to dump

[labilaab]

Sadly but its the sad truth happening to new projects fate nowadays. I think the devs and bounty manager conducting this airdrops should at least lock the tokens for specific time or have the strategies of locking a certain amount to control the massive dumping.

[glendall]

the most interesting way is to avoid free distribution,
like airdrop, avoid it so that there isn't too much dumping.
and instead of raising prices, promotions and good news must be periodically issued, at least 1 month to 2 months.

[Iykecollins]

A good project will always succeed no matter how it is viewed, as long as people have trust and believe on the project and the team is determined to succeed, however I believe that the distribution pattern should be looked into in order to control dumping but I think a greater part of the dumping comes from private owners and developers who have larger part of the tokens, the 1% allocation to bounty hunters is not enough for dumping

[mrdeposit]

Not distributing big amounts to hunters, or listing on bigger exchange are important factors too. But, all factors depend on the team, and if the tactic is good, it does not matter, and contrary.