Bitcoin Forum
January 26, 2020, 07:52:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: You may not like CSW...  (Read 9694 times)
XinXan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 505


Free Crypto in Stake.com Telegram t.me/StakeCasino


View Profile
June 01, 2019, 05:38:41 PM
 #41

OP is clearly a troll (or mentally ill) I have seen his other threads. CSW was proven to be a fake long ago by multiple people, he had all the chances to actually prove his identity if he wanted to. You also only need to hear him speak about technical details to realize that he is not Satoshi. The copyright claim was also just bullshit anyways. I wish people would stop giving the guy attention, all exchanges should refuse to list his shit coin.

1580025132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580025132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580025132
Reply with quote  #2

1580025132
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1580025132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580025132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580025132
Reply with quote  #2

1580025132
Report to moderator
1580025132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580025132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580025132
Reply with quote  #2

1580025132
Report to moderator
1580025132
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580025132

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580025132
Reply with quote  #2

1580025132
Report to moderator
CryptoLing
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 511
Merit: 26


View Profile
June 01, 2019, 05:44:16 PM
 #42

This is the comprehensive evidence that CSW is NOT Satoshi : Link

Everyone is Satoshi, expect CSW  Cheesy
uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
June 01, 2019, 05:51:52 PM
 #43

CSW was proven to be a fake long ago by multiple people, he had all the chances to actually prove his identity if he wanted to. You also only need to hear him speak about technical details to realize that he is not Satoshi. The copyright claim was also just bullshit anyways. I wish people would stop giving the guy attention, all exchanges should refuse to list his shit coin.
He did not prove anything regarding his claims and if he is not able to do anything of that sort he should not reveal and come in the forefront with all those claims but that being said you cannot question his technical knowledge, i have heard some of his discussions earlier and i thought it was a joke when he said bitcoin was turing complete well back in 2015 but later it was proved that bitcoin is in fact turing complete and it was a jaw drop moment for me, so i would not question his technical skills but no one is Satoshi unless there is concrete proof cryptographically.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit AirDrop $.|.Get 700 YoDollars for Free!.🏆
gmaxwell
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 3096



View Profile
June 01, 2019, 06:37:39 PM
Merited by Red-Apple (1)
 #44

but later it was proved that bitcoin is in fact turing complete
You've been suckered.

Bitcoin is not turing complete.  If some small additions were made (e.g. enabling covenants) it would be, all wright did is repeat long known and publicly printed stuff and jumble it up with technobabble to confuse the reader and pretend that (1) he was showing turing completeness (he wasn't) and (2) that he was saying something new or unknown.

It is also not particularly desirable or even useful for a thing like bitcoin to be made turing complete.  Bitcoin isn't a computer (if it were it would be the stupidest computer ever conceived) but a _validator_.  Turing completeness isn't required to validate any claim.

I would really like to know how wright managed to fool you on this.  He repeated over and over again that he had cellular automata running on bitcoin proving its turing completeness, but then never pointed to where they were (and, of course, people looked and there were none).  So is that all it takes? just repeat something a number of times and then wait a year and wham, a few percent of people will just believe?
ETFbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 2168

Use SegWit and enjoy lower fees.


View Profile WWW
June 01, 2019, 07:01:45 PM
 #45

Looks like OP is victim of Illusory truth effect Tongue

I'll just leave this link here : https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 12:35:54 PM
 #46

I would really like to know how wright managed to fool you on this.  
You are the boss buddy Wink, but i have gone through Clemens Lay papers and Craig's and with the possibility of functions they propose it is indeed turing complete, i have not tested to come to an indefinite conclusion myself and i know bitcoin does not have the loop function to be a complete turing complete machine, in Craig's paper he used simulation of linear iteration using an unrolled loop function, theoretically that is possible, happy to learn more about that from you. Smiley

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit AirDrop $.|.Get 700 YoDollars for Free!.🏆
gmaxwell
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 3096



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 01:52:51 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2019, 03:51:05 PM by gmaxwell
 #47

You are the boss buddy Wink, but i have gone through Clemens Lay papers and Craig's and with the possibility of functions they propose it is indeed turing complete, i have not tested to come to an indefinite conclusion myself and i know bitcoin does not have the loop function to be a complete turing complete machine, in Craig's paper he used simulation of linear iteration using an unrolled loop function, theoretically that is possible, happy to learn more about that from you. Smiley

If Bitcoin as it exists were turing complete, than craig would be able to point to the transactions he claimed he had in the network implementing a turing complete cellular automata.  Yet no such transactions exist.

Craig's paper is mashing together terminology culled from the bitcoin-wizards irc logs and bitcoin-dev (e.g. total language), none of which means turing completeness.

If you can't actually defend the claim you shouldn't be repeating it, unless you want to get downrated for promoting a scam.  Not trying to be mean, but people confirming things they half understand and repeating it is a big part of how he perpetrates his scam.
Reid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 549

English is a language.Not a measure of intellignce


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 02:09:36 PM
 #48

He watched to much Marvel specially Iron Man.

It is like he said "I am Iron Man." Grin
Now he is a target. I dont really care now about his claims but he is really making some bad decisions here.
Awards? That is for starters. Next time it will be his life which is on the line.

He may have wished he didnt do it.

uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 02:32:08 PM
 #49

If Bitcoin as it exists were turing complete, than craig would be able to point to the transactions he claimed he had in the network implementing a turing complete cellular automata.  Yet no such transactions exist.
That is true as there is no transaction that could prove his claims.

Craig's paper is mashing together terminology culled from the bitcoin-wizards irc logs and bitcoin-dev (e.g. total language), none of which means turing completeness.

If you can't actually defend the claim you shouldn't be repeating it, unless you want to get downrated for promoting a scam.
The mashing up of terminology made me believe that it was turing complete, i will never promote a scam, so go easy on me buddy. Kiss

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.YoBit AirDrop $.|.Get 700 YoDollars for Free!.🏆
Kryptowerk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 783


Crypto artist and Bitcore (BTX) inspirer.


View Profile WWW
June 03, 2019, 02:37:29 PM
 #50

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
Where did you get your troll certificate? I want one, too. <3

On a serious note: You do realize anyone could have claimed that copyright for them. The copyright claim happens automatically for anyone trying it.
NOTHING IS PROVEN, expecpt the fact that CSW is a lying, attention seeking POS. So nothing new really.

||     Best crypto investment advice: Invest in your education. Watch Andreas Antonopoulos.     ||
||  My art projects: CRYPTO COSMOS: A Cryptocurrency Card Game  |  Monero XMR Postcards + more | Poster  | BTC postcardsThe Great Bitcoin Hatching: Massive artwork (limited metal plate print)  ||
||  Community Crypto Project: Bitcore BTX - hybrid fork with SegWit support and 10 MB blocks  ||
leonair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 292


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 10:30:43 PM
 #51

Nonsense post, If CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto then he must prove it but he can't simply move a single or even a fraction of a Bitcoin from the genesis block. Craig Steven Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, he only wants publicity, end of the story.
ðºÞæ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 292


Bitcoin © Maximalist


View Profile
June 04, 2019, 05:37:43 AM
 #52

On the Satoshiness of Dr Craig S Wright  (from @shadders333)


https://www.yours.org/content/on-the-satoshiness-of-dr-craig-s-wright-6d80f2050fe1


"The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling."  Satoshi Nakamoto, April 2009          Avoiding taxes is totally legal if you consider and respect the law.
ene1980
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 507



View Profile
June 04, 2019, 08:06:42 AM
 #53

Nonsense post, If CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto then he must prove it but he can't simply move a single or even a fraction of a Bitcoin from the genesis block. Craig Steven Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, he only wants publicity, end of the story.
So you are telling that if he could move bitcoin from the genesis block you will accept him as Satoshi  Roll Eyes . How long you are in the bitcoin platform to be ignorant like this, just understand the basics first dude, looks like you have no clue that genesis block zero is not movable. When it comes to Craig it is documented that he is deceptive and went on to provide fake documents in court, the legal course will play on its own and we as a audience will witness the drama unfolding. Grin




.




  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄████████▀▀▀▀███▄
███████▀     ████
███████   ███████
█████        ████
███████   ███████
▀██████   ██████▀
  ▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀

  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄
██    ▄▄▄▄▄ ▀  ██
██   █▀   ▀█   ██
██   █▄   ▄█   ██
██    ▀▀▀▀▀    ██
▀██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▀
  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

            ▄▄▄
█▄▄      ████████▄
 █████▄▄████████▌
▀██████████████▌
  █████████████
  ▀██████████▀
   ▄▄██████▀
    ▀▀▀▀▀

    ██  ██
  ███████████▄
    ██      ▀█
    ██▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
    ██▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
    ██      ▄█
  ███████████▀
    ██  ██




               ▄
       ▄  ▄█▄ ▀█▀      ▄
      ▀█▀  ▀   ▄  ▄█▄ ▀█▀
███▄▄▄        ▀█▀  ▀     ▄▄▄███       ▐█▄    ▄█▌   ▐█▌   █▄    ▐█▌   ████████   █████▄     ██    ▄█████▄▄   ▐█████▌
████████▄▄           ▄▄████████       ▐███▄▄███▌   ▐█▌   ███▄  ▐█▌      ██      █▌  ▀██    ██   ▄██▀   ▀▀   ▐█
███████████▄       ▄███████████       ▐█▌▀██▀▐█▌   ▐█▌   ██▀██▄▐█▌      ██      █▌   ▐█▌   ██   ██          ▐█████▌
 ████████████     ████████████        ▐█▌    ▐█▌   ▐█▌   ██  ▀███▌      ██      █▌  ▄██    ██   ▀██▄   ▄▄   ▐█
  ████████████   ████████████         ▐█▌    ▐█▌   ▐█▌   ██    ▀█▌      ██      █████▀     ██    ▀█████▀▀   ▐█████▌
   ▀███████████ ███████████▀
     ▀███████████████████▀
        ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀
FIND OUT MORE AT MINTDICE.COM
Report to moderator
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 555

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2019, 05:06:31 PM
 #54

Some will never like him I fear

https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-libel-suits-crypto-critics/

Guess Satoshi s been forced into reaction mode?


Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!