DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate?

[Cat Coin]

All rating sites are information portals. There we take information, compare. study. And then go to the discussion forums, study the team, the topic and make a decision. It has to be.

[bonker]

Not,they are just here for making profits from ICO companies who will give huge amount of money for bringing attention about their projects and also they give fake feedback about any ICO if they got paid.

[Marry Finch]

In any case, the websites representing the rating of ICO projects give us some information about these projects. We can use it, comparing with other similar sites and already on this basis to develop our own opinion about ICO projects.
Of course, most of these sites give us sometimes one-sided information, but we can take it into account when studying the documents of such ICO projects on our own.

[Pffrt]

Most of the reviews are biased. The rating s only given good when they pay a good amount of money to the ico rating site. Ao, I think it will be worst idea to depend on ico rating site for investors.

[rosezionjohn]

I only know a few ICO review sites. I used to visit them before but after finding out some of their unethical moves such as giving a low rating then sending "random" users to ICO telegram groups to inform them of the low rating. They would even send someone that would act as a potential investor with a script that looks like this:

"I would like to invest but I am having doubts. I saw the review on this website xxx and the review is very low....."

[smyslov]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

I don't trust these rating sites, there were and still allegations of corruptions on these rating sites,  they are in fact number one promoter of scam ICO's by giving them fake rating by their paid so-called experts in the industry, people should not use this kind of websites, they should be independent.

[Kang TB]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

thats abosolutely right,,
most of ICO websites is paid services, and maybe the site just help to promote a project
i look at the website just to know about the list of upcoming and ongoing ICO not more
because i will do my own research before investing,and i hope all people will do their own research too

[Bitfling]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

I dont ranking on ICOs website are accurate but i think the information on ICOs website are useful. Its useful for investor as second opinion before make investment or useful to understand about the project, the team behind the project or others. Most ICOs website always put disclaimer on their analysis and its means we should do our own analysis before make investment on ICOs

[insidertradingeverywhere]

I only visit ICO rating websites to know trending ICOs and not to help me analyze if a project is legit or not. Most are paid reviews, don't get it twisted. So it's important you do your own research, not just concluding based on the ratings you see on ICO sites. Well, some boast of reputation like ICODROPS, ICOBENCH but please, never rely completely on them.

I agree with you mate because these websites are paid just to advertize and promote ICO's for exposure. This kind of business will not work anymore however these websites are not that accurate to rate such ICO's. We still need to do our own due diligence in choosing the right ICO to invest with. If you think they are reputable then go for it but yeah donot expect too much with these websites or else you will regret.

as they say - believe, but verify, of course, the sites will help evaluate the surface analysis, but nevertheless it is worth conducting your own investigation, ideally finding developers and finding out what is actually happening, I also think the work product is a significant factor,

[Burogh]

I only visit ICO rating websites to know trending ICOs and not to help me analyze if a project is legit or not. Most are paid reviews, don't get it twisted. So it's important you do your own research, not just concluding based on the ratings you see on ICO sites. Well, some boast of reputation like ICODROPS, ICOBENCH but please, never rely completely on them.

Indeed, most ICOs rating websites are paid reviews and i am prefer make my own analysis before make investment on ICOs. But now investor looking on IEOs because exchangers already make research about the project before held IEOs. Its good alternative for investor

[richminded]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

Having an active website on every ICO can prove its legitimacy but that is not enough as your basis. Rating sites is also not good because it can be manipulated and it can be a paid reviews. I think the best way to know if the project is legit is to study everything about the project, their plan and future goals for you to know if they can work on that.

[puremage111]

Well it really depends on the type of ICO sites
Some ico sites just wanted to make money so they promote every ICO without verifying them

So it's better to pick those with genuine and proper review

[Dpat]

The ICO website that are suggestion about the running or the upcoming ICOs may be to some extent helpful but not fully. Here in this site you only get a wide range of company information which are coming with ICOs but you should be of your own evaluation before joining any ICO.

[jcarlo]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

Having an active website on every ICO can prove its legitimacy but that is not enough as your basis. Rating sites is also not good because it can be manipulated and it can be a paid reviews. I think the best way to know if the project is legit is to study everything about the project, their plan and future goals for you to know if they can work on that.

Many people says rating website are manipulating and give paid review. Perhaps i dont know about this but on their website, they gave us many information about what purpose the project or developers team behind the project. If their review are paid by developers team, i think its normal as long they dont give bias information about the project itself

[Indrawan77]

I think it can be a good references and it can be a good place to start and do further research, but it can't be rely on 100%,if you want to invest in ICO you need to find different source of information, choosing ICO to invest only based on the website might be misleading

[bitbollo]

I have seen on scam accusation board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
a lot of scam projects listed/supported in ICO website. Also fake identities declared "verified".
Plus if ICO pay money, can receive visibility on these sites, despite the project has not any real value/or it's a scam.

[Red-Apple]

first of all i never suggest investing in any ICO under any circumstances because they are harmful to the whole ecosystem but people don't listen. as for these types of sites they may help a little at first but they all turn into bigger scams than the ICOs they are advertising because they all want to make money and ICOs are always open to bribing them. that is why people should never trust site like this.

[chatedha]

I open the ICO list website just to find out the latest ICO or is currently trending for now. And for any ICO rating, I don't really believe it.

[tabas]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.

As I've observed, yes they do help investors to choose the best ICO but this applies before when the paid reviews weren't a thing. But now, when you see an ICO there will be bunch of good reviews and you will doubt if those reviews are legit or paid.

Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.

Yes, this is what I mean, an ICO will pay them good and that ICO rating site will rate them good.

Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

Not anymore.

[Ararbermas]

DO you think ICO websites help investors to choose best ICO to participate.
Now there is a lot of websites rating ICOs, most of this websites rate the ICOs, but in other hand this websites charge fees from ICOs.
Which means that this evaluation may not be accurate, so do you trust these websites? and do you recommend using them?

no mate i don't trust on any ICO website ratings without doing technical analysis on my own, because it's still uncertain and there's a high possibility that it was fake,  because you know ppl now will pay for everything just to promote their project and so that they can convince more investors immediately . so it's a big mistake to put a trust easily on it , doing research is a must!