Craig Steven Wright: A False Prophet in Crypto

[BitBustah]

All he had to do was sign the early private keys and he failed to.  Of course there is speculation that Dave had those keys and they are lost.  CSW was definitely around those early bitcoin guys but if he really had a role in the creation remains to be seen.  I'll admit that I do sometimes watch his Youtube videos though.

[Mahanton]

Obviously, Craig only wants to gain people's trust but that would never happen again after that Bsv failure.
He always wants to ruin the reputation of Bitcoin but he will always fail because Bitcoin is well established and too strong for false news and controversies.

The Ultimate fail that he had done was proclaiming that he's Satoshi Nakamoto but eventually he cant provide any proofs with those claims thats why this dude is utterly bullshit on any angles.
And now he do said recently about not calling Bitcoin as BTC? He do just like trolling anywhere and none of the community would take this dude seriously.

[logfiles]

I don't even know why we or the Bitcoin world are giving so much attention to this chap. As we can see, he thrives on our attention. Once we start caring less and stop discussing him then he will be dead and gone.
Seriously, he adds Zero Value to Bitcoin so why even bother bringing him up here in Bitcoin Discussion.

"Let the Dead remain Dead"  

[ololajulo]

I am terribly disturbed by his distraction and I dont know he want plans to gain from this outcry. One of the advantage he has is the money from this space to sponsor this law suit, which I wish he could be controlled, and he is facing a terrible negligence from the space. If he is really satoshi, this forum is within his confers because he created this.

[ðºÞæ]

All he had to do was sign the early private keys and he failed to.  Of course there is speculation that Dave had those keys and they are lost.  CSW was definitely around those early bitcoin guys but if he really had a role in the creation remains to be seen.  I'll admit that I do sometimes watch his Youtube videos though.

Signing does not do anything except showing access at the moment of signing, aka Troll prove.

Possession of a key is not evidence of ownership. It was never the intent of Bitcoin. It is the intent of people like Greg Maxwell, James Donald, and others who seek a system that acts outside the law. If you have a stolen asset, possession doesn’t make it yours. It applies to Bitcoin equally. If bitcoin is stolen through stolen keys, they do not give the receiver ownership. They do not act as proof. In monetary law, money is fungible and transferable only when it is exchanged without knowledge of fraud or malpractice and for good consideration. It is critical. To be money, Bitcoin does not rely on the mere possession of keys, which is the aim and desire of those seeking a new version of Liberty Reserve coin or e-gold. There are some who will tell you that the mere possession of a key is definitive evidence. They are avoiding the rules of evidence and courts, and seek to alter their nature. They seek a precedent and to change the narrative to one that favours a more anarchist approach.

I will sign after I have definitively proven I created Bitcoin. Not before. The problem with the so-called “experts” is that they have no expertise. They seek to create a narrative and change reality such that it aligns with their beliefs, and believe that doing so will make them experts. Bitcoin is not bit gold, and it never will be.

‘Doing anything you want’ is not a system that is free. Freedom comes within society, and it comes with rules.

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/shades-of-black/

[Zemomtum]

So he is not the first to do this. Everybody want to be associated with good things in life, so it is of no any surprise to me seeing Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi. I think the real Satoshi needs to comeforth and keep to an end all these dramas

[rijaljun]

Maybe Craig Wright needs to sign in to the wallet of the Satoshi so we could know that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

Unfortunately it's not that simple and what you said is just a basic knowledge. I have a simple question for you... do you know which addresses are belong to Satoshi?

[Mrsparks]

I really don't know what Craig aims to get from all this lies and conspiracy. I see it as unnecessary attention to the the BSV project which will never get him the reference his seeking in the crypto space.. I just wish he move on from this silly games and focus on developing his project and contributing to the blockchain community..

[miner987]

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/shades-of-black/

Faketoshi.     

[Shenzou]

What really surprises me the most is not him claiming that he is the creator of bitcoin, because we knew that at first because there were many before him that were claiming the same thing , but him going as far as taking it to the court and providing false evidences of early address that the first transactions were sent from and with him having any of the private keys for them, i personally hope that he gets sewed and punished for his false claims in order to make an example from him to anyone who is trying or think about doing it in the future, besides people are giving him attention which exactly what his kind really wants.