Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2024, 11:47:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Can the L3 mine nScrypt?  (Read 186 times)
ccgllc (OP)
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 101

Math doesn't care what you believe.


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 06:58:07 PM
 #1

Recognizing that "normal" scrypt is the hash function called with N=10, I'm wondering if the L3 has that hardcoded or could be coaxed into running with other Ns?

Mined for a living since 2017.  Dabbled for years before that.
Linux admin since 0.96 kernel and Slackware distributions on (4) floppies...
MATHReX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 861
Merit: 281


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:13:31 AM
 #2

No, L3 chips (ASIC) are hardcoded to compute only Scrypt hash functions.
It cannot compute nScrypt.
Awesomus Maximus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 66


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:39:25 AM
 #3

As already answered, no it cant't. Only scrypt based coins can be mined (litcoin, dogecoin, viacoin, monacoin and others). Unfortunatelly, Nscrypt coins like FujiCoin are not minable with this miner. I am not aware if there is any ASIC to mine Scrypt-N algorithm yet.
ccgllc (OP)
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 101

Math doesn't care what you believe.


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 01:01:23 PM
 #4

Back in 2014 some of the early ASICs could (like Zeus products if I recall correctly).

Key is that Litecoins "scrypt" is just nScrypt with a N=10.  The Zeus products (and the promised-but-never-delivered GAW Vaultbreaker) could go up to N=12, but with rapidly declining hash rates.  Vaultbreaker was suppose to be able to handle N=14.  Its why alt-coins like IMACredit used an N=16, but they were before their time.  Back then, it was all about the fastest hash, unlike today where things like ZCash's SOL run at similar speeds and are obviously acceptable.

What I didn't know is if the L3 had N hard-coded or not.

Mined for a living since 2017.  Dabbled for years before that.
Linux admin since 0.96 kernel and Slackware distributions on (4) floppies...
MATHReX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 861
Merit: 281


View Profile
May 24, 2019, 06:38:17 PM
 #5

Back in 2014 some of the early ASICs could (like Zeus products if I recall correctly).

Key is that Litecoins "scrypt" is just nScrypt with a N=10.  The Zeus products (and the promised-but-never-delivered GAW Vaultbreaker) could go up to N=12, but with rapidly declining hash rates.  Vaultbreaker was suppose to be able to handle N=14.  Its why alt-coins like IMACredit used an N=16, but they were before their time.  Back then, it was all about the fastest hash, unlike today where things like ZCash's SOL run at similar speeds and are obviously acceptable.

What I didn't know is if the L3 had N hard-coded or not.

Well, L3 has N factor hard-coded. (Scrypt-N) N factor is a value which increases the memory requirement to compute the hash for the same algorithm which renders the ASIC with less than required N factor obsolete.
It is similar to DAG implementation for Eth hash based coins like Ethereum where the memory requirement for mining it will increase over time, thus producing ASICs for them quite a challenge.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!