Old blockchain.info wallet from 2014 and before -16,17,19 words precovery phrase

[Proty]

Trust will get you killed in this kind of situation you have to mind the information you give out as the information you give out to the wrong person can be used to steal from you in the process of a scammer trying to help you, doing your own personal research is advised to avoid falling into wrong hands. If you get personal a messages from someone offering you help in this regard before accepting to explain yourself to the person be sure to have done a good background check about the geniuness of the person and whatever you do should be documented so that if there are issues along the line in the business you can pursue a legal case to get back your money if you had already paid for the services.

What you are saying is right because this kind of issue is not just something that one will trust like that. Misleading information can lead one to serious mess, so it calls for extreme care on the part of everyone to research thoroughly and be well convince before trusting any information to avoid had I know. If there is someone who is trying to help out we should be careful if the person is not scammers. We should always take record of whatever we are doing for future references because it will help alot

[Bushdark]

~Snip~

I read in their medium article about the wallets they can recover, the list is long and I think you can check it. In that article they also explained some wallets they cannot recover such as stolen funds or so because they funds would have been moved from one wallet to the other.

So how will KeychainX knows that the wallet is compromised or not? Maybe they could have a tool to confirm this which I don't know but I doubt if it's possible to access another person's wallet info if the person is not related to the owner or closed.
Recovery a wallet that that is owned by another different person might not be as easy as we think.

[Obari]

~Snip~

I read in their medium article about the wallets they can recover, the list is long and I think you can check it. In that article they also explained some wallets they cannot recover such as stolen funds or so because they funds would have been moved from one wallet to the other.

So how will KeychainX knows that the wallet is compromised or not? Maybe they could have a tool to confirm this which I don't know but I doubt if it's possible to access another person's wallet info if the person is not related to the owner or closed.
Recovery a wallet that that is owned by another different person might not be as easy as we think.

The truth is, I don’t think it is possible to try recovering wallets of a third party without their consent because it might be called stealing and I believe that, if a wallet must be recovered it should be a personally wallet and the third party recovery should only be on special cases like death of owner, medical issues and any other obvious reason justifiable by the team.
I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

[Mr Reporter]

~Snip~

I read in their medium article about the wallets they can recover, the list is long and I think you can check it. In that article they also explained some wallets they cannot recover such as stolen funds or so because they funds would have been moved from one wallet to the other.

So how will KeychainX knows that the wallet is compromised or not? Maybe they could have a tool to confirm this which I don't know but I doubt if it's possible to access another person's wallet info if the person is not related to the owner or closed.
Recovery a wallet that that is owned by another different person might not be as easy as we think.

The truth is, I don’t think it is possible to try recovering wallets of a third party without their consent because it might be called stealing and I believe that, if a wallet must be recovered it should be a personally wallet and the third party recovery should only be on special cases like death of owner, medical issues and any other obvious reason justifiable by the team.
I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

As you mentioned, recovering any third-party wallet without a client's consent can result in unexpected questioning and privacy looping, which would be known as potential theft. I believe you were advocating restricting third-party recovery to exceptional circumstances, such as death or medical issues. I think that was a wise observation you made because such events are very likely to occur quickly, and it would be crucial to make sure that their procedures are transparent, secure, and fully compliant with applicable laws and regulations for their best interests.

[Joy- maker]

I think that this is a great idea, if we can get a few reputable members in this forum that has used their services before, it would be pleasant to hear from them how their experience was, if keychainx is as effective in recovering lost asset as they claimed, because when looking at review, some people may be  saying different things, even though the positive things are greater, you will still be skeptical about it, but if you are hearing of the experience of a few reputable members of this forum when they tried to use their services, you will be certain that you are making the right decision if you have a job at hand that you know they are capable off, but as for now, their is no 100% guarantee that they can do it and their is also no assurance that your asset is safe with them, so they needs to do more in building trust and confidence between them and their clients.

Exactly, it's really I great Idea if only we can get a few reputable members in this forum that has used their services before, or that know someone who had used there service before, believe me it will be enjoyable hearing from them how their experience was with this keychainX of a thing. And also how effective in recovering lost asset they can be.

[Bushdark]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

[Obari]

~Snip~

I read in their medium article about the wallets they can recover, the list is long and I think you can check it. In that article they also explained some wallets they cannot recover such as stolen funds or so because they funds would have been moved from one wallet to the other.

So how will KeychainX knows that the wallet is compromised or not? Maybe they could have a tool to confirm this which I don't know but I doubt if it's possible to access another person's wallet info if the person is not related to the owner or closed.
Recovery a wallet that that is owned by another different person might not be as easy as we think.

The truth is, I don’t think it is possible to try recovering wallets of a third party without their consent because it might be called stealing and I believe that, if a wallet must be recovered it should be a personally wallet and the third party recovery should only be on special cases like death of owner, medical issues and any other obvious reason justifiable by the team.
I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

As you mentioned, recovering any third-party wallet without a client's consent can result in unexpected questioning and privacy looping, which would be known as potential theft. I believe you were advocating restricting third-party recovery to exceptional circumstances, such as death or medical issues. I think that was a wise observation you made because such events are very likely to occur quickly, and it would be crucial to make sure that their procedures are transparent, secure, and fully compliant with applicable laws and regulations for their best interests.

Yes you got my point clear and secondly, if third party recovery are not strictly defined and scrutinized, there are possibilities that people might just submit random wallets and I understand that they would need to prove ownership before recovery and trust me, there are several possible ways a person especially a potential scammer could claim ownership of a wallet and that why the team needs a legal backings for situations like this.
But regardless of all what I’ve said, the team needs to be careful while caring out their activities if they’re truly genuine.

[Proty]

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

Well what you said is true because wallet recovery service is not something that one should just take for guaranted, infact it calls for great concerns. So I think it will be a good idea if legal consent is involved as this will guarantee the safety of both party, that is the wallet recovery service and the owner of the wallet. The reason for the legal consent is for documentation purposes and to avoid scam. Just like you said this recovery service do collect charge and as such there should be an agreement as per how much they will charge to avoid unnecessary drama at the end so legal agreement is very crucial

[Futurexxx]

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

Well what you said is true because wallet recovery service is not something that one should just take for guaranted, infact it calls for great concerns. So I think it will be a good idea if legal consent is involved as this will guarantee the safety of both party, that is the wallet recovery service and the owner of the wallet. The reason for the legal consent is for documentation purposes and to avoid scam. Just like you said this recovery service do collect charge and as such there should be an agreement as per how much they will charge to avoid unnecessary drama at the end so legal agreement is very crucial

Not only to avoid drama, it can also stands as a means of escrow between keychainx and it client, because when legal team are involved, the security of your asset is like 80% secure, because the legal team will come after anyone that tried to defraud or breach the contract that was signed, so it's a very good idea if legal agreement is part of any business done between keychainx and it client.

[mvdheuvel1983]

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

Well what you said is true because wallet recovery service is not something that one should just take for guaranted, infact it calls for great concerns. So I think it will be a good idea if legal consent is involved as this will guarantee the safety of both party, that is the wallet recovery service and the owner of the wallet. The reason for the legal consent is for documentation purposes and to avoid scam. Just like you said this recovery service do collect charge and as such there should be an agreement as per how much they will charge to avoid unnecessary drama at the end so legal agreement is very crucial

Not only to avoid drama, it can also stands as a means of escrow between keychainx and it client, because when legal team are involved, the security of your asset is like 80% secure, because the legal team will come after anyone that tried to defraud or breach the contract that was signed, so it's a very good idea if legal agreement is part of any business done between keychainx and it client.

Getting a legal representative for both parties is like going to the extreme why do we have reputable members who serve as escrow on the forum they are here because they are trustworthy and funds can be trusted into their hands without having any atom of fear. The best thing is for keychainx being the service provider to have a reputable member whom the forum trust to be at the front representing them and the client also agreeing for a reputable campaign manager or other reputable members of the forum to serve as an escrow between them so that if anything goes wrong the escrow will come up to bring the evidence of what exactly happened. In a situation where the legal team of the client doesn't know how to locate the company doing the wallet recovery business for his clients don't you think the forum is the best place where the alarm will be ranged if there are cases of fraud in the recovery processes? I think it is best to have all the agreement on the forum instead of taking it outside the forum by bringing in a legal representative.

[Agbamoni]

Getting a legal representative for both parties is like going to the extreme why do we have reputable members who serve as escrow on the forum they are here because they are trustworthy and funds can be trusted into their hands without having any atom of fear..

The two parties have to come to agreement, whether they want someone from the forum to be a third party in the agreement or they want a lawyers. But you should understand that they may be in different locations since it is a remote job. I dont think the platform has a physical office yet. After checking their website the only way you can contact them and go into an agreement with them is in three ways, their email - keychainx@protonmail.com, social media account and in the forum.

[Joy- maker]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

I think you're making some sense, because I don't think getting a legal consent for wallet recovery it's necessary, although everybody can decide to do what will suit them, if anyone decides to get a legal consent for wallet recovery there is not wrong with that, beside each an everyone of us must not think same way, as we are different, both in compilation and so on that's how will also think differently. So in this case I will say that everyone should do what will suit them, if getting a legal consent is what will suit you then fine go on nobody is stopping you.

[Futurexxx]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

I think you're making some sense, because I don't think getting a legal consent for wallet recovery it's necessary, although everybody can decide to do what will suit them, if anyone decides to get a legal consent for wallet recovery there is not wrong with that, beside each an everyone of us must not think same way, as we are different, both in compilation and so on that's how will also think differently. So in this case I will say that everyone should do what will suit them, if getting a legal consent is what will suit you then fine go on nobody is stopping you.

This is not about being sentimental or over reacting, it's more of security and guarantee that your asset is safe, yea it's true that people are entitle to do what they want but that doesn't mean that you should kill yourself with stupid decision making, that's why I believe that for safety and for security reasons, a legal team has to be in the midst of each transaction so as to avoid any fishy actions that may arise, and they will definitely stands as the much needed escrow service that service like this needs.

[Odohu]

Getting a legal representative for both parties is like going to the extreme why do we have reputable members who serve as escrow on the forum they are here because they are trustworthy and funds can be trusted into their hands without having any atom of fear..

The two parties have to come to agreement, whether they want someone from the forum to be a third party in the agreement or they want a lawyers. But you should understand that they may be in different locations since it is a remote job. I dont think the platform has a physical office yet. After checking their website the only way you can contact them and go into an agreement with them is in three ways, their email - keychainx@protonmail.com, social media account and in the forum.

I read somewhere that when they have to recover wallets from broken device, such device have to be shipped to their offices in some selected locations in Europe and other places. This shows that they have physical office which I actually do not know their addresses yet. Although there is a level of integrity they will build and it wouldn't matter if they have known physical office or not.

[CryptSafe]

.......if third party recovery are not strictly defined and scrutinized, there are possibilities that people might just submit random wallets and I understand that they would need to prove ownership before recovery and trust me, there are several possible ways a person especially a potential scammer could claim ownership of a wallet and that why the team needs a legal backings for situations like this.
But regardless of all what I’ve said, the team needs to be careful while caring out their activities if they’re truly genuine.

You are making a point here the organisation needs to get a legal backing which I believe it would be a safe guard for them while rendering services so that they don't fall into trouble of being apprehended by security agency for what they have no knowledge of. But I believe they would have to let whoever is patronising their services to sign an undertaken that such wallet they are presenting to them belongs to them and if anything otherwise happens while in the process of recovering the keys, they the organisation wouldn't be held responsible but the person who brought the wallet to them claiming ownership would be made to face the law as the case may be and according to their agreement as signed by both parties. I think this is for both to understand.

[Obari]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

I think you're making some sense, because I don't think getting a legal consent for wallet recovery it's necessary, although everybody can decide to do what will suit them, if anyone decides to get a legal consent for wallet recovery there is not wrong with that, beside each an everyone of us must not think same way, as we are different, both in compilation and so on that's how will also think differently. So in this case I will say that everyone should do what will suit them, if getting a legal consent is what will suit you then fine go on nobody is stopping you.

Personally I think getting a legal backing is necessary especially now that government are welcoming cryptocurrency and in as much we want to stay decentralized, we should also try consider the other way round of situations that would prompt legal backing’s and such is in situations where they unintentionally recover a wallet of a third party without their consent and maybe the right owner decides to sue them legally, I’m sure with legal backup and prove of term of service, they will be able to scale through in such a case.

[Gentle_Soul]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

I think you're making some sense, because I don't think getting a legal consent for wallet recovery it's necessary, although everybody can decide to do what will suit them, if anyone decides to get a legal consent for wallet recovery there is not wrong with that, beside each an everyone of us must not think same way, as we are different, both in compilation and so on that's how will also think differently. So in this case I will say that everyone should do what will suit them, if getting a legal consent is what will suit you then fine go on nobody is stopping you.

Legal consent to me is just a way one wants to be assured of his or her safety releasing sensitive informations I don't think there is anything wrong with it , that's where a third party comes in because one can not give it a 100% trust without some level of guarantee where one will be rest assured that if any thing goes wrong there is nothing to worry about as the company would always turn up.

For me I just wish there are different measures to guarantee safety and transparency.

[keychainX]

~Snip~

I read in their medium article about the wallets they can recover, the list is long and I think you can check it. In that article they also explained some wallets they cannot recover such as stolen funds or so because they funds would have been moved from one wallet to the other.

So how will KeychainX knows that the wallet is compromised or not? Maybe they could have a tool to confirm this which I don't know but I doubt if it's possible to access another person's wallet info if the person is not related to the owner or closed.
Recovery a wallet that that is owned by another different person might not be as easy as we think.

Its not possible to know if the wallet is compromised but many wallets are sold online and fake, so we usually check if its on that list.

There are several occations where we did find a wallet password but there was no privat key inside, as the wallet was forged.

So many different cases, and different solutions. Not one way solve them all.

/KX

[Promocodeudo]

You are making a point here the organisation needs to get a legal backing which I believe it would be a safe guard for them while rendering services so that they don't fall into trouble of being apprehended by security agency for what they have no knowledge of. But I believe they would have to let whoever is patronising their services to sign an undertaken that such wallet they are presenting to them belongs to them and if anything otherwise happens while in the process of recovering the keys, they the organisation wouldn't be held responsible but the person who brought the wallet to them claiming ownership would be made to face the law as the case may be and according to their agreement as signed by both parties. I think this is for both to understand.

Yea getting a legal backup is nice especially when it comes do with something as Delicate as the service they are rendering, wallet recovery service is not a joke in the cryptocurrency space because anyone can decide to act funny and I think thats why it is very much necessary for them to get a legal backup, the advice yiu gave in terms them presenting a paper to their clients tthugh their attorney to signed in case of any funny move by their clients, the signed terms will put them on safe side, even though their client decide to play smart by presenting a wallet that's not there own for recovery, the terms the consented to will rope them in if there should be any issue at the end, so it is a welcome idea for them to get a legal backing to this effect.

[Joy- maker]

I also want to know if the team has any legal backings for their services incase there are cases that requires legal actions like maybe they recover a third party wallet unintentionally?

This is getting more interesting by the day but do you think there is need for legal consent for wallet recovery?
If there should be a legal consent, any person that has a wallet recovery services must have gotten a legal consent and must have been registered so in case any thing goes wrong. Majority of these services have particular percentage they do request after they might have recovered the fund. This percentage can be from 5% upward depending on the legal agreement.

I think you're making some sense, because I don't think getting a legal consent for wallet recovery it's necessary, although everybody can decide to do what will suit them, if anyone decides to get a legal consent for wallet recovery there is not wrong with that, beside each an everyone of us must not think same way, as we are different, both in compilation and so on that's how will also think differently. So in this case I will say that everyone should do what will suit them, if getting a legal consent is what will suit you then fine go on nobody is stopping you.

This is not about being sentimental or over reacting, it's more of security and guarantee that your asset is safe, yea it's true that people are entitle to do what they want but that doesn't mean that you should kill yourself with stupid decision making, that's why I believe that for safety and for security reasons, a legal team has to be in the midst of each transaction so as to avoid any fishy actions that may arise, and they will definitely stands as the much needed escrow service that service like this needs.

am not being sentimental or over reacting in this case I know this is more of security and guarantee that your asset is safe no doubt about that, but if you read my comment down below you will see where I made this statement that everyone is entitled to do what will please them, If getting a legal consent is what will please you it's fine you can go head, beside everybody must think in the same direction I just gave my own opinion that I don't think it's necessary to get legal consent in wallet recovery you and the team incharge can handle it amicably just my thought please.