Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer

[Quickseller]

37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d
Loan date: May 10, 2019
Amount 0.5 BTC
Date of theft: May 22, 2019

Where is the link to Hhampuz and this address?

I couldn't find anything for the address in question.

32KWpF9URwysaHmyvYJFN9RNJ9iBsCX6rE belongs to Hhampuz

This is the address where Hhampuz receives the payment for managing all of his signature campaigns.

For example, to 32kwpF...6rE is 44e85e0c987db8768d69cc0201d59a639483c0201424ebe215e6a5b1903eae1b which is from bc1qfsra7mfzu3e9kkx53kacfg25e65xu75lgllqrk -- he posted a link to the above txid here, indicating he paid the week three payments for the BitcoinCasino.com signature campaign. This address is part of [6df4a1879c] on walletexplorer. Also from this address is 8c3b182116928314fa0bcb4f4c6a99a967a786e7b505f400ca5ea8f3446faa56 which Hhampuz posted here, and 01ee6575c59e3664a5c012f607f9bfce18cffceba5329362a78a6e0bf603f2c4 which Hhampuz posted here, both for the same signature campaign. Each time, as part of the payments to participants for this campaign, he sends himself 0.0225 BTC.


Looking at other transactions received by 32kwpF...6rE, 5fb428c2a968df5ba884a19a77dd2bf894e1e9e0ce0697f1f0098c9ba3486fa6 was posted here, and 5f16ba490237a1cda6e4c1cef5cbb172ece4c48474568c7705ce8fe2f2c2d00a was posted here, both from bc1qqc69ylxx9d6vm3j35vqxd3t90fxulr7n22rsnt both in the amount of 0.02 BTC and both in the PlayBetr signature campaign threads.


Also to 32kwpF...6rE is a0365aa7d569d24b738e0acffd0a89f5b8f59be14ada229faf59164543f8ca6c which is from 1Nz6yBEKg8Wr8zGVZcxTrQUbGneRXbChij which also sent BTC to Hhampuz via f1de4e80724bb26352d6889aeff249bae2063dc95b7363f2a08943aa7d6732d3 9328e72667cb49a7c9b257dda145d219347efe97a7164f897f0cfcb52fc54780 e128901031405a773ce6f5ad41f8ddb5bd2f88b96b15e631b3561d1a0a0fc86c and abc337ab33cd691c5d2d8d7e91276157a23276be6b8030a349343a367fd8a78a .... none of these transactions were posted by Hhampuz, however they were all either immidiately before or after 24427e9d1e7df01f5e5552a1cc67196d9093e1fda49e7298c019f72e3eb38816 which Hhampuz posted here, 299ffbe32197672df2da3aca53e9c52580d0b248cf36534c1d700bf2b34a9427 posted here, 0d23a199251cee7f60ac539ee5e211e6a73192478f26950de9e0c94da1832a81 posted here, e16b5109391e1f7a38a80010dbef31a85ef6fc6ba0ac6c627fb198615b57714c posted here, 8bdbd1de5c240c793db410dc7b4860d828492bb9b8f8f17b3544507b054aa2d9 posted here, all of the transactions are from 1Nz6yBEKg8Wr8zGVZcxTrQUbGneRXbChij and are posted in the LiveCoin signature campaign. Some of the transactions (not mentioned) immidiately before/after the LiveCoin signature payments were sent to other addresses than 32kwpF...6rE and some of the LiveCoin signature payments have small amounts additionally sent to 32kwpF...6rE that is not accounted for on his spreadsheet.

To even further strengthen the connection to Hhampuz, 572f1c9db10f5a1841165bea13baaa7ba59c85404798eecca9c02ef3f9a5c597 sent BTC to 32kwpF...6rE which was from 3MFaRCvArRg5ELaoUotHpDcVCaHSpDgDGn   which Hhampuz posted here as the payment address for a raffle. As a side note, the BTC in 3MFaRCvArRg5ELaoUotHpDcVCaHSpDgDGn eventually made its way into a Poloniex account that does not belong to Hhampuz, which indicates he was selling a physical coin not belonging to him, but that is off topic here.

The tl;dr is Hhampuz consistently received transactions to 32kwpF...6rE either as part of, or immediately before/after transactions that paid participants of three signature campaigns he is/was running, and received a transaction directly from a raffle he was hosting.

Back to the transaction in which Hhampuz received his 0.5BTC loan, 37892d5fa2478958ef322e6261a9dd6695943affc175f40109b98381f9bee99d is from bc1qjw4n3mu5q2hlzjca3ufkhyn7pzmw6pshruzu9f which belongs to DarkStar_. The loan was received on May 10, and 32kwpF...6rE is part of [021ea21872] on WalletExplorer. This wallet, and other addresses I found that had known personal funds of Hhampuz had a zero or near zero balance immidiately after receiving 0.5BTC from DarkStar_.

I had discovered the loan some time ago, and as I told DarkStar_, I did not want to screw him over in exposing the loan before he was repaid, decreasing the chances he would be repaid. It was pointed out to me that DarkStar_ had recently sent trust to Hhampuz for repaying the 0.5BTC loan, and it looks like Hhampuz also gave DarkStar_ positive trust for this loan.

[1715595166]

1715595166

[1715595166]

1715595166

[1715595166]

1715595166

[1715595166]

1715595166

[1715595166]

1715595166

[The-One-Above-All]

Hhampuz has always managed signature campaigns very well.

This accusation is pure fucking bullshit.

OP needs to go deepthroat a shotgun and pull the trigger cause he's a fucking lying cunt.

 

This seems rather a violent and nasty reply.

Hhampuz seems rather shady lately.

1. refusing to be transparent in his campaign selection process
2. supporting the dox and placing at risk the forum treasurer and the boards funds.
3. Now he is engaging in trust flag abuse
4. it appears that he may be stealing btc

Please deal with the fact people that sometimes seemingly do the right thing for a time can go off the rails. Hhampuz is demonstrating he is clearly not fit to be a campaign manager lately for the sake of the reputation of the projects that use his "service"

what other projects is hhampuz "managing funds for" this should perhaps be brought to their attention to alert them of the distinct and real dangers here with this individual.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

You still haven't posted any hard evidence, just assumptions (circumstantial evidence at the very most).

[Quickseller]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind.

Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds.

[suchmoon]

No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind.

Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds.

No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.

[TheNewAnon135246]

No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind.

Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds.

No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.

I think you're onto something. Sounds super smart to wreck his credibility and reputation, risking a steady income of ~1.2 BTC per month, to embezzle 0.5 BTC. Especially since it's a well known fact that many people pay close attention to anything that happens during a closure (or exit scam).

[bones261]

No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.

No, Hhampuz is not clairvoyant. It's obvious that he is an agent working undercover for the Dutch government. Hhampuz knew the shit was about to go down by the 10th, so he asked Darkstar_ for the loan. After all, it was a Friday, and Hhmapuz wanted to have a wild weekend. Hookers and blow don't come cheap.

[yahoo62278]

Is Hhampuz able to flag QS for this thread? Potentially trying to harm him gaining new clients, so technically couldn't that be considered personal loss?

[bones261]

Is Hhampuz able to flag QS for this thread? Potentially trying to harm him gaining new clients, so technically couldn't that be considered personal loss?

I believe Hhampuz already has supported this flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79 I'm not certain that he can invoke a red flag, since I don't think the terms of the signature campaign specified implicitly or explicitly that anyone butthurt by getting the boot couldn't cook up some conspiracy theory.

[suchmoon]

Is Hhampuz able to flag QS for this thread? Potentially trying to harm him gaining new clients, so technically couldn't that be considered personal loss?

I believe Hhampuz already has supported this flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79 I'm not certain that he can invoke a red flag, since I don't think the terms of the signature campaign specified implicitly or explicitly that anyone butthurt by getting the boot couldn't cook up some conspiracy theory.

If he suffers a loss as a result of this frivolous accusation I'd say at least the 3-year red flag is warranted. The implied contract clause should cover premeditated attacks. For example, if someone hacks my account and steals money am I not allowed to red-flag them just because I didn't have a "no hack" contract with them?

[Quickseller]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind.

Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds.

Hhampuz has other bills to pay other than the loan. From the 10th until the 27th, he would spend all of the bitcoin he received to that wallet within a couple of days. He has previously publicly said he does not have a traditional 9 to 5 job. He went from having zero on the 27th to over 0.55 BTC to repay the loan on June 8th.

You choose to ignore the facts, and are acting in bad faith, as per usual.

No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.

He most likely took out the loan because he was in need of money at the time. He took advantage of BestMixer closing to use the money to repay the loan.

I think you're onto something. Sounds super smart to wreck his credibility and reputation, risking a steady income of ~1.2 BTC per month, to embezzle 0.5 BTC. Especially since it's a well known fact that many people pay close attention to anything that happens during a closure (or exit scam).

There is no evidence that he makes that much money. No, selling off his assets, or withdrawing BTC from an exchange is not income.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Even more assumptions.

Moving funds =/= spending. You can't conclude anything about his income or spending pattern by looking at 1 address. You're just pissing in the wind here (as usual).

[BitPotus]

Hhampuz has always managed signature campaigns very well.

This accusation is pure fucking bullshit.

OP needs to go deepthroat a shotgun and pull the trigger cause he's a fucking lying cunt.

 

This seems rather a violent and nasty reply.

Hhampuz seems rather shady lately.

1. refusing to be transparent in his campaign selection process
2. supporting the dox and placing at risk the forum treasurer and the boards funds.
3. Now he is engaging in trust flag abuse
4. it appears that he may be stealing btc

Please deal with the fact people that sometimes seemingly do the right thing for a time can go off the rails. Hhampuz is demonstrating he is clearly not fit to be a campaign manager lately for the sake of the reputation of the projects that use his "service"

what other projects is hhampuz "managing funds for" this should perhaps be brought to their attention to alert them of the distinct and real dangers here with this individual.

piss off you fucking snowflake.

you're trying to destroy someone's reputation with baseless accusations.

so you can stick your little vendetta far up your arse.

cunt.

 

[Stedsm]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

So, basically what you're trying to say is that, Hhampuz took a loan from DarkStar_ (I know about that as I can see his post history) at the time when Bestmixer was going to shut all their operations? And you think he knew that before and did everything intentionally?

Well, as you said you've got txid, why are you crossing your own words (by putting those IDs in suspense) and saying that he purchased Chips from Chipmixer which ended (specifically, landed) to DarkStar's address/es? You should really come up with great evidence to prove him guilty, else you're again trying to harm "just another guy's" reputation here.

Even more assumptions.

Moving funds =/= spending. You can't conclude anything about his income or spending pattern by looking at 1 address. You're just pissing in the wind here (as usual).

True, people here can easily use more than 10s of 100s of addresses every single day, so it's not really easy for anyone to "assume" about anybody's spends and earnings here.

How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh! 

[Quickseller]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

So, basically what you're trying to say is that, Hhampuz took a loan from DarkStar_ (I know about that as I can see his post history) at the time when Bestmixer was going to shut all their operations? And you think he knew that before and did everything intentionally?

I am saying that I have presented substantial evidence that Hhampuz has a loan outstanding as of immediately prior to when BestMixer shut down. I have no reason to believe he knew about this ahead of time. I am saying that he took advantage of the situation to repay his debt with money belonging to BestMixer. The repayment happened either directly or indirectly with BestMixer money— meaning that he may have run the specific inputs through one or more mixers before repaying the loan and he may have used BestMixers money to pay other bills/expenses and as a result was able to use other inputs to repay the loan that he would have otherwise used to pay those bills.

I don’t think he would have taken the loan if he knew about BestMixer closing in advance. Others bringing this up are trying to create a distraction.

Well, as you said you've got txid, why are you crossing your own words (by putting those IDs in suspense) and saying that he purchased Chips from Chipmixer which ended (specifically, landed) to DarkStar's address/es? You should really come up with great evidence to prove him guilty, else you're again trying to harm "just another guy's" reputation here.

I am not sure what you mean here. There is evidence that Hhampuz
*had a loan outstanding as of when BestMixer closed down.
*moved the money belonging to BestMixer to a mixer (chipmixer) immediately after BestMixer closed.

There is also evidence that Hhampuz earns his living from his business here and as such he cannot use all of his earnings to repay any loan he takes out. He must use some of his earnings to pay for things like rent, food, utilities and other bills he may have. 

Even more assumptions.

Moving funds =/= spending. You can't conclude anything about his income or spending pattern by looking at 1 address. You're just pissing in the wind here (as usual).

True, people here can easily use more than 10s of 100s of addresses every single day, so it's not really easy for anyone to "assume" about anybody's spends and earnings here.

How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh! 

See above. The specific fact set that can be proven will allow a reasonable person to conclude that Hhampuz stole money for his personal use.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?

Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

So, basically what you're trying to say is that, Hhampuz took a loan from DarkStar_ (I know about that as I can see his post history) at the time when Bestmixer was going to shut all their operations? And you think he knew that before and did everything intentionally?

I am saying that I have presented substantial evidence that Hhampuz has a loan outstanding as of immediately prior to when BestMixer shut down. I have no reason to believe he knew about this ahead of time. I am saying that he took advantage of the situation to repay his debt with money belonging to BestMixer. The repayment happened either directly or indirectly with BestMixer money— meaning that he may have run the specific inputs through one or more mixers before repaying the loan and he may have used BestMixers money to pay other bills/expenses and as a result was able to use other inputs to repay the loan that he would have otherwise used to pay those bills.

I don’t think he would have taken the loan if he knew about BestMixer closing in advance. Others bringing this up are trying to create a distraction.

Well, as you said you've got txid, why are you crossing your own words (by putting those IDs in suspense) and saying that he purchased Chips from Chipmixer which ended (specifically, landed) to DarkStar's address/es? You should really come up with great evidence to prove him guilty, else you're again trying to harm "just another guy's" reputation here.

I am not sure what you mean here. There is evidence that Hhampuz
*had a loan outstanding as of when BestMixer closed down.
*moved the money belonging to BestMixer to a mixer (chipmixer) immediately after BestMixer closed.

There is also evidence that Hhampuz earns his living from his business here and as such he cannot use all of his earnings to repay any loan he takes out. He must use some of his earnings to pay for things like rent, food, utilities and other bills he may have. 

Even more assumptions.

Moving funds =/= spending. You can't conclude anything about his income or spending pattern by looking at 1 address. You're just pissing in the wind here (as usual).

True, people here can easily use more than 10s of 100s of addresses every single day, so it's not really easy for anyone to "assume" about anybody's spends and earnings here.

How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh! 

See above. The specific fact set that can be proven will allow a reasonable person to conclude that Hhampuz stole money for his personal use.

I hope that you will self-reflect one day and realise how much you come across as a mouthbreather. I bet he has a lot of trouble paying a few bills with 1+ BTC a month.

[ChemicalSpillage]

As for the circumstantial evidence link... there is some substance to it but it is marginal, in my opinion.

I'm not quite sure why the funds moved but here's something of note:

Assuming a steady income of bitcoin, Hhampuz has the ability to repay the loan.
The loan terms are unknown therefore we cannot conclude anything of the date of repayment.
We can assume but we do not know how much bitcoin Hhampuz has in any alternative wallets.
We can assume but we do not know how much bitcoin Hhampuz makes in a given period of time.
We can assume but we cannot conclude.

[suchmoon]

I hope that you will self-reflect one day and realise how much you come across as a mouthbreather. I bet he has a lot of trouble paying a few bills with 1+ BTC a month.

What if he has a pill addiction, that can be costly. Just saying. I mean there is about as much evidence of that as anything else.

~

nullius, is that you bud?

Merit count exceeding post count combined with Merriam-Webster trips my sock alarm.

Edit: V8's post explaining that ChemicalSpillage is actmyname's official alt was deleted for some reason so... ChemicalSpillage is actmyname's official alt.

[bones261]

I hope that you will self-reflect one day and realise how much you come across as a mouthbreather. I bet he has a lot of trouble paying a few bills with 1+ BTC a month.

What if he has a pill addiction, that can be costly. Just saying. I mean there is about as much evidence of that as anything else.

     Oh my, it appears Hhampuz needs an intervention.    Rehab can be expensive. Perhaps we should put a fund together so community members can pitch in. We will have QS act as escrow. But will Hhampuz even go?