Ratings.

[sehoon]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

[1714925619]

1714925619

[1714925619]

1714925619

[1714925619]

1714925619

[BicycleMan]

👛 OWNR Wallet – is a secure and convenient non-custodial cryptocurrency wallet that allows you to manage your cryptocurrencies by storing them in encrypted storage on your device. Similar to Atomic Wallet, Exodus, Jaxx, Trust Wallet, but more convenient and better!

Visa cryptocard: Directly in your OWNR wallet or on the website, you can apply for a Visa crypto card. Credit your card instantly with cryptocurrency, pay your purchases at corner shops and in your favorite online services.

Buy crypto in a wallet: You can also buy and exchange cryptocurrency directly in your OWNR wallet at a favorable rate for you.

Withdraw cryptocurrencies with OWNR wallet: Sell cryptocurrencies and receive fiat funds to your Visa/Mastercard card in a few clicks.

Supports cryptocurrencies: BTC, BCH, BNB, TRX, LTC, ETH, SOL, ZEC, DASH, DOGE, MATIC, AVAX. Also supports USDT/USDC stablecoins in ETH, SOL, TRON, BNB

📲 Download OWNR Wallet on the Google Play
🍏 Download OWNR Wallet on the Apple Store
💻 Download OWNR Wallet for Desktop
💳 Order a Visa crypto card

[Script3d]

You shouldn't use ico rating websites to judge the quality of a project, they're unreliable, it's better to do your own research instead of looking into these websites, who knows if the project paid the website to give out high ratings.

[bittraffic]

Ratings are paid. The team will always find a way to market their project and getting it listed on ICO rating sites are part of it.  They paid for its listing that is why the people in the ICO rating sites will also give it a high rate. Some of those projects with high rates by the way didn't get much funds too. There were thread about these too, let me just find them.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4494842.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4825890.20

Can't find the particular one that I have read before but the above must be enough.

[redsun114]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

Well I can't vouch for any ICOrating site we have in existence since they are all being updated by humans, and most humans love money, besides they created the site so that they could make some cash for themselves. What they do is that they message this project telling them to pay some amount of money so that they could list them in a rating site and the amount of money they pay will determine the rating they get, though I might be very wrong about this, but I believe that's the way it's been done.

[rafi035]

ICO rating does not guarantee the project will succeed, what can be counted on is when investors believe in the project and the ranking will be top.

[MUG1WARA]

don't believe in ICO rating because most of them are just manipulations, they pay to get a high rating, maybe only a few ICOs really really get high rating

[dimonarka]

I believe that there are often no such services when listing a project from the beginning should be checked by experts, but you should understand that they are people too and can make mistakes and of course their mistake can deprive you of your investments, therefore I strongly recommend studying projects yourself and after that decide on investing.

[Nalbo]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

They also provides reasons for giving it that score and you can analyze their data to decide on your own about what works for you. A rating 3 can be good than a rating 5.
They do verify the identity of the team members which helps you to start with. The milestone tab lets you know how long they are been working and what have they already achieved. You can look and compare many project.

[Pom_bensin]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

I don't believe fully in the icobench, I only see a list of projects in the icobench, then I do my own analysis and observe whether the project is feasible to follow or not. so don't expect too much in the icobench ratings.

[therhslv]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

Oh better don't trust ICO rating sites , there is plenty of proof that IcoBench ratings was quite high as project turned out to be a scam . I think most of the ICO rating sites got paid for sponsoring and rating projects on top There is even so called ''experts'' failed quite alot of times . How do they even check if KYC documents are real ? I think before listing project on ICOBench they should make a video call and arrange some interview so ICOBench visitors atleast see faces behind the project

[sujonali1819]

Now a days most of the ico ratings is paid. Project owners pay the admin for high ratings. So we should not trust these site blindly. It is better to investigate a project by own self that makes more confidence I think.

[Awesomus Maximus]

I would not say they are reliable 5% of the time. 95% would be impossible. Knowing that you can pay ICObench for your project to get a good rating on their website tells you everything you want to know. How can you trust their rating if it can be rigged like that? So, no, you can't trust their rating at all. Fine projects can have smaller ratings and fake projects large ratings. Do your own research to increase the probability of choosing a good project to invest in.

[brilly17]

sometimes to sees as confronting supports of confirmation to sells token with the initials on difference with the ico price as the release on market. to work also on comparison with release from different portal of ico business with available choice on selection by the forum of bitcoin workers.

[didzi]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

sometimes a rating site is a paid services,
so, i don't believe with any rating website for a new project
for me doing my own research on any cryptocurrency project is the best idea mate

[sehoon]

Ratings are paid. The team will always find a way to market their project and getting it listed on ICO rating sites are part of it.  They paid for its listing that is why the people in the ICO rating sites will also give it a high rate. Some of those projects with high rates by the way didn't get much funds too. There were thread about these too, let me just find them.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4494842.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4825890.20

Can't find the particular one that I have read before but the above must be enough.

Thought so, I just asked this because I wanted to make sure. I've joined a lot of projects that are highly rated in websites like icobench and some of them didn't really perform well and until now they are making nothing. Though I'm not believing that all of them are actually paid because there is still a possibility that they went wrong on something.

[nutriagrigia]

A lot of projects are simply invited to their advisors the “experts” from ICOBENCH and they give them high raitings. I do not believe any ratings

[sri.bima]

Maybe you should not only see the quality of the project with the ICO bench, because that does not guarantee the project is successful. But doing further research on the background and also the team behind the project. Do not do research in a simple way, but must be thorough and detailed. Goodluck!

[cryptonx]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

simple, if you believe with ICObench, just follow the rating on ICObench buddy without doing your own research 
but always remember to invest with your own risk buddy

[Malam90]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

Maximum ratings shown by ICObench are fake and this ratings are given by paid members or by promoters. Sometimes we can see high ratings campaign but don't get too much funds. So ratings isn't fact rather team, roadmap, and real prospects are always vital for the success of a project.