Ratings.

[OptimusPrime_3]

I don't put my mind on the ico bench ratting although I do check and go through the comments of the so called professionals to get some insight about the projects. Many of this rating does not guarantee the success or failure of a project

[lobat999]

Not only in ICO bench but I guess almost all of these rating sites are not very reliable since most of them are paid services and maybe had secret deals with most projects trying to have a higher ICO rating in order to influence would be investors. I guess we must all be vigilant about this!

[ethereumhunter]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

I don't know because I don't use the ICO bench to know the rating for each project. But that could be true and reliable since we don't know how they determine the good project and I am curious with the number they add for each project. If you want to know by yourself, you need to search more information about the projects, talk with the developer and the team so you will get more details on the project which will useful for yourself, and you can decide to invest or not.

[bristlefront]

Those who rates ICOs are paid for a greater reputation please as possible do your own research on finding a good ICO to invest with. Some ICOs that are rated high years ago are somewhat abandoned or some have still no progress.

[AgentZero23]

Before I used to look at ratings when choosing on what projects I want to promote. And ICOBench was one of them and I stop when I found out that some projects pay the reviewers just to have a good ratings. And I saw some ICOBench members being an advisors in some projects and most of them become a failed projects or turned to be a scam.

[melomanskiy]

I didn’t really trust this analytical site before, and now all the more. All ratings are bought for money, all experts do not represent anything important. So this service has long been sent to ignore.

[Oilacris]

Do the ratings in ICObench reliable at least 95% of the time?

When you do make some investment,dont ever tend to rely 100% with these ICO rating sites yet most of them aren't really that
transparent at all, yet there have been issues about paying up for a review which means these reviews are bias and does only
for the money.Even how shit they are they would still get that shitty good review with these sites.

[aderidwan98]

Do not be too confident with rating, because the rating does not guarantee, the coin you mean is good, because there are also many coins that have a high rating but eventually scam

[akitha]

i think no.. some ICO sites are being paid just to rate new ICO's.. this should be check, as mostly investors are checking the ratings of every project and assure that  the project is good to invest..

[ginobitcoiner]

I only support ratings for the projects that I follow, I never refer to a website rating in determining which projects I follow.
sometimes they can be manipulated to get a good rating and get investor trust.

[jossiel]

Nope, don't ever trust ratings there because most of the ratings there now are sponsored or in short, they're all paid. Are you still investing in ICOs? if that is so you don't rely with such ICO ratings site because you will never hear an honest review anymore.

It's all about on how they market the project these days and expect that if there's ever be an honest one, it's hard to figure out.

[kawetsriyanto]

Actually, ICOBench is very popular rating sites for ICOs. So far, many ICOs uses the rating in ICObench to prove that they are legit enough. But in fact, not all of them are legit and proven. Some of them may be able to buy or pay for the good rating (who knows). And probably not 95% true, I think it is no more than 75%. Just never put your trust only based on rating, do your own search and analysis.

[akitha]

no not at all.. if you look carefully those ratings are only paid just to boost their ICO popularity.. those project mostly are scam or just want to attract investors and after that nothing will happen on their project.. they want only money