Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 05:44:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Should there be an option of adding 2fa for forum accounts?  (Read 235 times)
iamsheikhadil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 133


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 06:14:28 AM
Merited by dragonvslinux (1)
 #1

What I have seen is if someone gets to know your password, they literally have your whole account. Specially if there is no bitcoin addresses signed by you to prove your account ownership. Even if you later recover your account by any means, much harm for your account be already done much of which are irreversible like fake dms and trash posts to make your reputation trash. Should there be an additional requirement for logging in beside password, be it 2factor or email authentication for new IPs, the chances for such attempts would be less.
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715017488
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715017488

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715017488
Reply with quote  #2

1715017488
Report to moderator
1715017488
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715017488

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715017488
Reply with quote  #2

1715017488
Report to moderator
Findingnemo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 758


Bitcoin = Financial freedom


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 06:15:58 AM
 #2

Suggested million times already. Roll Eyes

███████████████████████████
███████▄████████████▄██████
████████▄████████▄████████
███▀█████▀▄███▄▀█████▀███
█████▀█▀▄██▀▀▀██▄▀█▀█████
███████▄███████████▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████▀███████████▀███████
████▄██▄▀██▄▄▄██▀▄██▄████
████▄████▄▀███▀▄████▄████
██▄███▀▀█▀██████▀█▀███▄███
██▀█▀████████████████▀█▀███
███████████████████████████
.
.Duelbits.
..........UNLEASH..........
THE ULTIMATE
GAMING EXPERIENCE
DUELBITS
FANTASY
SPORTS
████▄▄█████▄▄
░▄████
███████████▄
▐███
███████████████▄
███
████████████████
███
████████████████▌
███
██████████████████
████████████████▀▀▀
███████████████▌
███████████████▌
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████▀▀███████▀▀
.
▬▬
VS
▬▬
████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
░▄████████████████▄
▐██████████████████▄
████████████████████
████████████████████▌
█████████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████▌
███████████████▌
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████▀▀███████▀▀
/// PLAY FOR  FREE  ///
WIN FOR REAL
..PLAY NOW..
View ArchiveReport to moderator
TheBeardedBaby
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 3134


₿uy / $ell


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 06:37:38 AM
 #3

This :
~
@theymos, couldn't a lot of this be avoided if we had a 2FA system in place?  I know you don't want to use the google system, and I don't blame you, but what about a decentralized system like using a PGP public key to generate single-use passwords, and send PGP encrypted password recovery links to the registered email?

I know we've discussed this numerous times, and it's always been shutdown.  Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse, but I think I would rather live the downsides of a 2FA system opposed to the downsides of farming out account recovery.

That wouldn't eliminate the need for manual recoveries; it might even increase it as people lose their second factor. 2FA would be nice, but IMO the email notifications provide many of the same benefits, so it's not high on my to-do list.

thd26bct
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 300
Merit: 93


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 06:55:42 AM
Merited by TheBeardedBaby (1)
 #4

Beside almost zero probability to see 2FA in the forum, I have a good news for OP, that is the new forum software, Epochtalk, will have 2FA. You can see 2-Factor Authentication in Planned Features
The Epochtalk has been in its current Version 0.4.0
Epochtalk is ready, theymos wants us to test it. C'mon...
One user start a trial forum to test the software, here: https://www.cryptos-currencies.com/boards. That trial forum has its ANN topic here: Cryptos-Currencies.Com : First forum using Epochtalk
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 2204


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 11:57:01 AM
 #5

Suggested million times already. Roll Eyes

Probably because it's actually a very good suggestion that still hasn't been implemented. Truth is if it's not PGP-based 2FA, it's not secure. Even TOTP would be a move forward. Until then, I won't consider my account secure, even if it's insured by PGP. But security and insurance are two completely different things. Security is more important than insurance.

Example: Everyone's accounts that have been hacked due to a SPOF (in this case the password).
Problem: Server-side security that also depends on customer-side security is an unnecessary security hierarchy.
Solution: Let the users become responsible to decentralize security, implement the option of 2fa.

I don't think it should be a requirement though no, let the users decide if they want their account to be secure or not.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
TheBeardedBaby
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 3134


₿uy / $ell


View Profile
May 30, 2019, 10:24:12 PM
 #6

Beside almost zero probability to see 2FA in the forum, I have a good news for OP, that is the new forum software, Epochtalk, will have 2FA. You can see 2-Factor Authentication in Planned Features
The Epochtalk has been in its current Version 0.4.0
Epochtalk is ready, theymos wants us to test it. C'mon...
One user start a trial forum to test the software, here: https://www.cryptos-currencies.com/boards. That trial forum has its ANN topic here: Cryptos-Currencies.Com : First forum using Epochtalk


That's true but again, nobody knows when this new forum software will be introduced to the forum. It can take a few more years as theymos wants epochtalk to be a bit more widely spreaded before we can see it here.

shield132
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 853



View Profile
May 30, 2019, 11:58:45 PM
 #7

You guys think a lot around it, don't know why but still think. Everyone who is careful with his/her account, keeps it safe and there are such zillion members including known members too.
What about this option too (don't blame me, somehow just immediately came to my mind).
Every member will choose at any point one or two bitcoin adress and put it in their profile. For additional security, on every login attempt, forum will generate any random text and will require from you to sign message from your adress where you'll only sign that text which is generated from forum. Once you add key and text, forum will confirm if message is signed and after positive result, you'll login.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
thd26bct
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 300
Merit: 93


View Profile
May 31, 2019, 12:18:49 AM
 #8

That's true but again, nobody knows when this new forum software will be introduced to the forum. It can take a few more years as theymos wants epochtalk to be a bit more widely spreaded before we can see it here.
The Epochtalk need more testers, more clone forums from its source codes to find any kind of bugs and reports from such forums back to theymos, in order to fix them all. Such a migration from a huge site (with huge user data) like bitcointalk.org to a new one requires as carefully preparation as possible. In the forum, there are drama pops up, so we don't need any types of drama wave due to the migration to new forum (Epochtalk). Even years later, it's not a problem, because sign a message with bitcoin address, and newly account recovery procedure are enough to secure accounts.
Honestly, at the first days I joined the forum, I felt it is boring due to its interface, but by now, I am familiar with such classic forum, and don't really want to move to other colorful forums. Maybe I get older a little bit.
richminded
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 268


View Profile
May 31, 2019, 01:30:56 AM
 #9

Suggested million times already. Roll Eyes
Answered many times by many users, and the statement of Theymos should be enough not to push this one out.

This :
~
@theymos, couldn't a lot of this be avoided if we had a 2FA system in place?  I know you don't want to use the google system, and I don't blame you, but what about a decentralized system like using a PGP public key to generate single-use passwords, and send PGP encrypted password recovery links to the registered email?

I know we've discussed this numerous times, and it's always been shutdown.  Forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse, but I think I would rather live the downsides of a 2FA system opposed to the downsides of farming out account recovery.

That wouldn't eliminate the need for manual recoveries; it might even increase it as people lose their second factor. 2FA would be nice, but IMO the email notifications provide many of the same benefits, so it's not high on my to-do list.
Now we have an answer again.  Smiley
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!