Another Satoshi filed claim for Bitcoin Whitepaper

[IIV]

With Craig Wrights disputed copyright claim on Bitcoin Whitepaper made in the the United States Copyright Office, he got many abusive response and still been able to pump his private currency upto 90%.
Now comes another one to challenge Craigs Claim,



A person called Wei Liu has filed for the copyright of Bitcoin Whitepaper.

https://www.coindesk.com/another-satoshi-second-copyright-filing-appears-for-bitcoin-white-paper

[BQ]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

[drumamat]

Yes I've seen the news.This is another PR move by an unknown (at least to me) Chinese woman.The whole community is just having fun on who Satoshi is. Guys, I'm Satoshi!I'm thinking of applying tomorrow. .

[mk4]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

[Tipstar]

Anyone please link me to the registration website. If not the third, I want at least to be the top 10 claimers of Bitcoin Whitepaper, I guess my name too would be written somewhere. And lets see how much is Craig Wright willing to go to save his fake claim. How many lawsuits would he claim before he realizes he's just being fooled.

[o_e_l_e_o]

This isn't new. It's only become big in the media recently because famous liar, scammer and all round fraud CSW has done it. Here's the record of someone called Ronald Keala KuaMaria, who registered copyright for the bitcoin whitepaper and claimed the pseudonym "Satoshi" 3 years ago:



As mentioned, anyone who is willing to fill in a form and pay a $35 dollar fee can register a copyright claim exactly as CSW did. The US Copyright Office even issues a press release clearly stating that these claims are not investigated, validated or verified in any way, and it does not mean that the claim is truthful or accurate.

The whole thing is complete nonsense.

Anyone please link me to the registration website.

The website you are looking for is here: https://www.copyright.gov/registration/. The required form to complete is this one: https://www.copyright.gov/forms/formtx.pdf.

[Shova]

This isn't new. It's only become big in the media recently because famous liar, scammer and all round fraud CSW has done it. Here's the record of someone called Ronald Keala KuaMaria, who registered copyright for the bitcoin whitepaper and claimed the pseudonym "Satoshi" 3 years ago:

So, Craig was not the number 1.
So it proves it all was a strategy to pump the fake Bitcoin SV coin. Though Mr. Craig was successful to some extent. He has destroyed his name forever. People used to consider him a fool and now they'd know him better as a liar.

[LeGaulois]

It will become a meme and folks will file a claim just for fun or to piss off CW. I will do too if I know the link to do that. Spending some buck just for fun. What could cause several problem and fight is the brand Bitcoin, the WP author isn't so important
And yes everyone can file a claim and the funny thing is there is not really any background check. Everyone could say he did the WP.

[ðºÞæ]

Four have so far copyrighted Bitcoin

2011 MtGox, (Mark Karpelès).
2016 Ronald Keala Kua Maria
2019 Dr. Craig Wright
2019 Wei Liu

It is a criminal offense claiming copyright if not the original developer. Three or all four could possible have legal issues to deal with.

[kryptqnick]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

While it seems like something annoying that people try to obtain a copyright for Satoshi's work, now that Craig did it, it's actually good that someone else is objecting to that. Because if nobody does, then Craig officially has the rights for profits out of the inventions that are considered to be his. Moreover, if more people come by, there's a good chance it will piss off the authorities, and they will set very strict requirements like proving the ownership of Satoshi's bitcoins and will not let anyone sue others for copyright infringement until there's strong evidence supporting particular authorship.

[dothebeats]

I think I'm gonna have to file my copyrights too just so I won't miss the party these guys are having right now. But seriously this just shows how inefficent and incredible the US copyright office is. They can literally just handout the copyright to anything and earn that measly $35 for the paperworks. For sure, legal consultation + court proceedings in the event of a dispute is already anticipated by them, that's why they easily give the copyrights to literally anything without verifying the claims.

Kudos to Wei Liu anyway for making CSW look like a fool!

[Naida_BR]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

Indeed. And I wonder why people think that this is hot news. Anyone can claim it but we will never know who is the real.
And apart from that, is CSW claimed the copyrights why BSV is pumped and not BTC? He filed claims for BTC and not BSV. I truly believe that there are a lot of naive people in the market even after all this bear market.

[xvids]

Yes I've seen the news.This is another PR move by an unknown (at least to me) Chinese woman.The whole community is just having fun on who Satoshi is. Guys, I'm Satoshi!I'm thinking of applying tomorrow. .

LOL anyone could put up an act like that the only question is are they willing to degrade their own like Craig?
The crypto community would just laugh and have fun with this so self proclaimed Satoshi ,
If they really want to act please give us a more interesting act with a good acting tools or proofs.

[franky1]

the ronald registration has no mention or relevance to bitcoin.

"an equity based.." is nothing to do with it
so using ronald as an example is futile.

but the wei lin one is atleast relevant

what people need to know is in a court room. at a time of final judgement. CSW and wei lin would not win any case they got into if that case was defended.

BUT here is the issue

OUTSIDE a courtroom and before judgement or undefended. scammers like CSW can perform cease and desist scams on people with flimsy records with their name on.

these scams play out because scammers threaten large sums and make it so going to court is so expensive that the victims if naive pay a early settlement just to get the scammer to stop hassling them

much like them annoying malware that says pay up in 72 hours or have files deleted. you'd b surprised how many people pay up

[squatter]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

And yet there's still plenty of BSV shills coming out of the woodworks claiming it's proof of something. At least now we can turn around and say, "Craig Wright is no more legitimate than Wei Liu."

I was hoping this stunt would tempt lots of other people to file similar copyright registrations, proving how silly the whole thing is. Maybe this is just the start.

[pixie85]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.

[Genemind]

It's easy for them to fake Satoshi for their own private coin's benefit but people now are aware of this dramas.
One person has done it and it's enough for most investors to notice who's lying and who's not.
I guess it would be better if we will just ignore them.

[Ailmand]

Sounds like more people are following the footsteps of Craig and that's insane. They are thinking that they will succeed through that strategy. Why don't they promote their own coins in their own ways? People will only hate them for doing such thing and might affect their coins as well.

[TimeBits]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.

What do you mean probably?

Wei Liu: “I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”
Well you are wrong, only one person is Satoshi, everyone can pretend to be Satoshi. There was one Michael Jackson or Nikola Tesla, there was many impersonators or posers.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright

[Lanatsa]

But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.

What do you mean probably?

Wei Liu: “I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”
Well you are wrong, only one person is Satoshi, everyone can pretend to be Satoshi. There was one Michael Jackson or Nikola Tesla, there was many impersonators or posers.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright

I tried to find the reason of Wei Liu about such claim and thanks for sharing this link up.This do only proves out that anyone can be satoshi by paying up $35.
Only 4 people tried it so far and CW is the total bullshit of them all.