Awww...he actually apologized. Dude must have learnt his lesson...though the hard way. Can we try give him another opportunity to prove himself and his intentions for the project? We all deserve second chances 🙏
but why -3 Trust, all 3 for the same issue? Should not be punished 3 times in a row by 3 different people. Anyone who look into his current trust will say project is likely dead, because developer cheated many times...
The trust factor may mean something, but it is up to the user how to assess the reasons why he got those negative trusts. And in his case, it is plagiarizing white paper, where most projects are already doing such kind of activity. They are not alone in this kind of issue. So it is up to him how he will revive the project and make its presence worthwhile in crypto. If he is not strong enough, this project would be a failure soon but if he believes he has something to offer to community, he will continue working on his project...
