2 shitpost and 10 merit. For new acc from Legendary member.

[PolinaCryptoN]

cryptogendrop

This user is new. Date registered - today.

Have 2 shitpost. And legendary member send 10 merit.

Post 1

Security wallet
Provides an easy-to-use wallet function (more than 90% of assets are stored in cold wallet, safe and secure), and also provides a personal cold wallet for large-value customers (signing device through an offline Android phone), from new users to large customers can find their own easy-to-use cryptocurrency wallets.

Official accounts and paid readings
You can create your own COINCHAT official account, post articles, and get your readers' cryptocurrency rewards, supporting BTC, ETH, USDT, etc.

You can also set the official accounts as a paid one to earn cryptocurrency income.

Support hundreds of currencies, BTC, ETH and ERC20. And we will continue to support more mainstream currencies.


COINCHAT, the safest digital wallet, has now been officially published. The first 10,000 new users can win a candy lucky bag(which has BTC&ETH in it). Send invitations to a friend for more candy bags. Click here to receive:

https://www.coinchat.im/candy/utFrqzty8q3Ql7Cga8RRdxyNK8Rvcp6Tp

Come and join the fun.

If you are on telegram come and join our group for more free drops tokens and plenty of giveaways provided by our team and group.

https://t.me/joinchat/Jux9LUh3aeQpqXV_Fj7vOA

Post 2  ( with 10 merit)

# Proof of Participation

Email Address used for creating your Bitwings Account: cryptogendrop@gmail.com
Completed Required Tasks?: Yes
Completed Additional Tasks?: Yes
Joined @bitwingsairdrop on Telegram?: Yes
Telegram Username: @cryptogendrop
Ethereum (ERC-20) Wallet Address: 0x121201889375462Ec7a3a9cFd38C72E59596D732

Merits send by
crazyearner


I think they are connected, because no1 sending merits for this shitposting

[yahoo62278]

I have tagged the merit sender and will possibly remove the tag once they respond here.

I have not tagged the receiver as they may or may not be connected, you need to show proof for that.

The sender however is possibly selling merits, possibly an alt of the receiver, or just a total idiot for meriting a proof of authentification post.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

crazyearner seems to be likely hacked/sold (1year gap). Also those posts aren't merit worthy. Very likely case of merit abuse or merit trading.

Yep, all of what you wrote is spot-on.  This is the second thread I've posted in today in which there's been obvious merit abuse (or at least misuse).  I don't usually even bother replying, but it looks like crazyearner and the member from the other thread don't even care that it's obvious what they're doing.  Hopefully this isn't going to become more of a problem than it already is.

The sender however is possibly selling merits, possibly an alt of the receiver, or just a total idiot for meriting a proof of authentification post.

If the sending account is hacked or sold, then there's a very high probability that the new owner is selling the sMerits on it or sending them to an alt account.  Either way, both accounts are definitely connected IMO.  Nobody gives merit to a bounty post just to be generous.

[suchmoon]

Without proof that they're alts it's a nothingburger. User even has "crazy" in his name and does crazy things... hardly a red-tag offense.

[yahoo62278]

Without proof that they're alts it's a nothingburger. User even has "crazy" in his name and does crazy things... hardly a red-tag offense.

Hence why I added the option just possibly an idiot for what they merited.

I'd still like to see a response before I remove the tag, could be something or could be nothing at all. A simple response could fix it all

[Mpamaegbu]

The sender however is possibly selling merits, possibly an alt of the receiver, or just a total idiot for meriting a proof of authentification post.

If the sending account is hacked or sold, then there's a very high probability that the new owner is selling the sMerits on it or sending them to an alt account.  Either way, both accounts are definitely connected IMO.  Nobody gives merit to a bounty post just to be generous.

...Or possibly misquoted and merited a wrong post. I guess we shouldn't rule out that angle too. These things happen, especially when people are tipsy or drunk and decide to post.

[nakamura12]

It's either merit abuse (selling, giving to alts trading merits and other ways to abuse the merit system) or the merit sender did it intentionally. I think the merit sender didn't know the changes made by theymos about the rank changes also I think the merit sender is not active for 10 months because this person's last post is from june 12, 2018 until april 4, 2019 which the merit sender posted again. Let's wait for this forum user to respond in this thread to know his/her reason why giving 10 merits to a useless post that is posted the newbie.

[YOSHIE]

If I have a thousand sMerit, surely, I will fly it to those who are entitled to receive it, obviously.

There is nothing wrong with the actions of anyone who gives sMerit. But I feel this is one of the most ridiculous things, for people who like it. This is annoying, for today's achievements, many people abuse it.

I think this Merit is based on, Emotional someone in spilling anger.

I am not claiming that this is wrong or true that happened.
But there are exceptions.
As it is now also happening to:
> Jimmy Crypto

Summary:
> Merit summary for Jimmy Crypto

S deposit proof:
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149540.msg51313000#msg51313000
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149709.msg51323018#msg51323018

Post, 2, 25 Merit.

This is Satoshi Nakamoto: https://gizmodo.com/the-strange-life-and-death-of-dave-kleiman-a-computer-1747092460

3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149536.msg51313517#msg51313517

I thought and saw many members in this Forum who gave decent posts to get Merit, but precisely what happened was only seen begging, for one s Merit for those who deserved it, it was ironic, and boring.

[Joel_Jantsen]

I have tagged the merit sender and will possibly remove the tag once they respond here.  

Hasn't theymos mentioned leaving a negative trust for merit related cases like this are not a good use of the trust system? I mean there are no proofs of accounts being connected or anything.. I'd probably hear their side of the story before leaving a negative trust.

[yahoo62278]

I have tagged the merit sender and will possibly remove the tag once they respond here.  

Hasn't theymos mentioned leaving a negative trust for merit related cases like this are not a good use of the trust system? I mean there are no proofs of accounts being connected or anything.. I'd probably hear their side of the story before leaving a negative trust.

you have quoted my response where I specifically say I will likely remove the tag once they respond.

Just looking for a little responsibility from the user and normally if you message them, they normally ignore the PM.

Theymos also doesn't want users tagged for spamming but that hasn't stopped some people has it.


*EDIT* tagged removed, don't wanna give 20 more users a reason to spam a worthless thread.

It's very likely the account is hacked like TP said earlier so tagging it is really doing the forum good but whatever. Getting to be where having your own opinion is worthless around here unless the consensus agrees.

[bones261]

If I have a thousand sMerit, surely, I will fly it to those who are entitled to receive it, obviously.

There is nothing wrong with the actions of anyone who gives sMerit. But I feel this is one of the most ridiculous things, for people who like it. This is annoying, for today's achievements, many people abuse it.

I think this Merit is based on, Emotional someone in spilling anger.

I am not claiming that this is wrong or true that happened.
But there are exceptions.
As it is now also happening to:
1. Jimmy Crypto

Summary:
Merit summary for Jimmy Crypto

S deposit proof:
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149540.msg51313000#msg51313000
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149709.msg51323018#msg51323018
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149536.msg51313517#msg51313517

I thought and saw many members in this Forum who gave decent posts to get Merit, but precisely what happened was only seen begging, for one s Merit for those who deserved it, it was ironic, and boring.

   All three of these merited posts are deleted as spam. 

[nakamura12]

   All three of these merited posts are deleted as spam. 

It should be deleted if the merited post is not merit worthy at all. Actually, I don't know if the deleted post are still accessible or can be accessed by admin. This is what I know, even if I deleted my post but the data is not deleted from the forum itself so I think the deleted post can be seen by the staffs but the forum users won't be able to see it.

[FFrankie]

So you realize when you click merit it opens up a new tab and 0 is already in the box, if you are quick and not paying attention where you click, you can put the 1 before the 0 and it makes 10.

[logfiles]

So you realize when you click merit it opens up a new tab and 0 is already in the box, if you are quick and not paying attention where you click, you can put the 1 before the 0 and it makes 10.

This is understandable  but when it happens on a proof of authentication post, then there is something more than just a mistake. It's abuse, given that the account being merited is newly registered and made only 2 posts.

[r1s2g3]

Those who have all airdropped sMerits (rarely earned ), are very prone to fumble in sending merits.
Reason can be anything like ranking up their own alt  or not able to understand the use case of Merits.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Sometimes the way we handle some situation make the genuine users trying their very best to earn merit with quality contributions look stupid. How on earth, this act isn't a clear abuse of the merit system, the sender of the merit haven't encountered the receiver (no record found in post history) for we to classified his act as an emotional one (like i see some users via reply above trying to justify) view the merited post, below are several other accounts with zero merit and just few post that means most of those accounts are either alts just cheating the Airdrop or new users that joined forum for the airdrop so none of those posts deserve merits.

This is a clear abuse so as merit abuses don't deserve red tagging, the clear cases like this one should have been reversed also this is another situation that calls for the decaying of all airdropped smerits, must merit abuses are linked to these airdropped smerits (just view sender's merit record).

[DireWolfM14]

This is a very suspicious set of circumstances.  Just a couple days ago Jimmy Crypto had only three merit, and created this thread in Meta, asking about avatars.  Now, just a few days later he's half way to his goal, with 50 merit from another Bitcoin FS shill? 

[Oyarebu]

This is a very suspicious set of circumstances.  Just a couple days ago Jimmy Crypto had only three merit, and created this thread in Meta, asking about avatars.  Now, just a few days later he's half way to his goal, with 50 merit from another Bitcoin FS shill?  

Not just 50 Merits but 53 for just one liner shit-replies, in case you aren't aware of this thread, you can view this for the full communication. This case was a case of Merit Abuse, but many of the high rank members withdrew from tagging the sender but tagged the receiver, as at yesterday before i laid down. Merit Abuse for spreading Bitcoin FS

[Jet Cash]

It's becoming quite a problem to find posts to merit. I keep meriting Heroes and Legendaries.

I've made a few posts on Fit to Talk, and I'd like to revive the concept of translating posts for non-English speakers so that they can earn merits on the English boards. I think this will help to build an integrated international community here as well. Any suggestions as to how to improve on this will be accepted with gratitude.

[Oyarebu]

It's becoming quite a problem to find posts to merit. I keep meriting Heroes and Legendaries.
<....>

With due respect sir, there are good posters around the forum especially those who aren't interested in the politics. Candidly, you are a distinguished member of this forum and have learnt lessons from most of your threads here on this forum. We may not be perfect like ou guys, but we are striving unto perfection, personally; am improving on my self daily and the evidence is crystal clear.