No knowledge is lost.

[HellDiverUK]

All steps in the business must be accompanied by knowledge, small things in making decisions must be based, such as when we are trading in deciding to buy or sell based on knowledge of the market, charts and so on, without it just getting lost and just relying on luck

[mardaed]

Do u mean non ICO is a self funded project?  I think no project can survive when there is no exact funding. Thats why a project going for ICO because they want to be well funded and well known to the crypto world. It's also an advantage of project in ICO to be known but we can't deny the fact of many abusive project lurking that ended as scam.

[beeelzebub]

Maybe in the beginning days of crypto a self funded project maybe has a chance to succeed. But nowadays i think without proper funding for developing and marketing, success rate is below %1.

[DeepChipolino]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Your question contains a hypothesis. But is this hypothesis true? Or do you have the results of a research on this issue?

The best project without an ICO is bitcoin.
The best project with ICO is ethereum.
I do not think that one of them is better than the other. In addition, the future will change market conditions. Who knows what will be better?

[john alex young]

I do not really understand your point. In my opinion there is no project without ICO. Because ICO-funded projects are better and clearer than projects that have no ICO.

[sri.bima]

It would be better and perfect if you first learned about the ICO project, and then gave clear questions. Maybe you interpret the number of ICO projects that have failed, but that does not mean that all ICO projects are like SCAM. Please differentiate fundamentally first.
Thank you so much.

[MMA Rats]

I do not really understand your point. In my opinion there is no project without ICO. Because ICO-funded projects are better and clearer than projects that have no ICO.

I also think that there are no projects without ICO, it is better to invest in projects with investments than to engage in such nonsense

[rhomelmabini]

Okay, I already get what you really meant.

You could probably mean it is Bitcoin as it hasn't conduct any offerings but I guess you are wrong if you think that if someone conduct an ICO will at the end be failed, dead or left abandoned. The great start of ICO is when Ethereum did it, and look how better they are, though most from the past that those who conduct ICOs hasn't do any better or shall I say most fail.

I guess those who doesn't conduct an ICO are sure successful just imagine no set price has been given but value continues to increase an example of that is Bitcoin. But this days, I couldn't think if that will be possible again with no proper funding.

[kenelmark]

At first glance I understand that if the project without ico they are really ready in terms of funds so that it is easy to carry out developments, while those who hold ico they are only ready in terms of concept while the funding aspect is still very much needed.

[ethereumhunter]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

I don't think so. Every ICO has the same opportunity to become a scam in the future, and we don't know which project will do that. We only know when the project was running for a while, but there is no update news from the developer or the teams, and we don't know how the progress of the project.

[abake]

Most projects with no ICO always have private investors. Take for instance IOST, they did very well after listing on Binance. Project with no ICO doesn't mean nobody buys into their coin, private sale is even better off, especially when the vesting period for private investors is reasonable.

[sngwinner]

If one person or a group decide to develop a project from their on pocket, then it means they have a big plan for the project and are committed to seeing it progress so they can reap from it. On ther side, if a project is funded through ICO, the team contributed less and still jave huge sums of money and so in most cases, the commitment will less. My suggestion though

[abake]

Yes sure, no knowledge is a waste. I also think people dump ICO coins on exchange because of this same notion that the price normally dumps when listed. And now IEO coins pump because of the notion that the do well upon listing. But that's not the case in all situations. Take for instance IEO listed on Bittrex, which dumped below the IEO price. Also some ICOs still do well upon listing. I think some teams set strong buy wall (buy back strategy) to avoid massive dump.

[Kaneki11]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Project with no ico doesn't mean there isn't any funds to raise the project.. there must have been some sort of private investment.. anything would be a shit death trap coin

[Kaneki11]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

I think hes talking about projects that give a way free tokens on bounty and airdrops.. but the truth is.. they must have made some forth of private investments .. else the project is definitely a scam

[BigBrother]

If the projects do not conduct ICO now, it does not mean that they are better. Just ordinary investors do not trust the ICO and project developers understand this. Now they are just looking for a sponsor who will be interested in their product and therefore they do not need to raise funds through an ICO.

[Gi01]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

What you don't really understand is not about ICO project contributing or not contributing to the progress of a crypto project. The progress of every crypto project solely depends on the actual purpose of the project and what the project is actually solving in the crypto ecosystem and the world in general. Majority of the  crypto projects who do not have ICO's basically have well define purposes and addresses realistic problems seen in the entire world.

[BryanK]

Many projects are aimed at institutional investors. And such investors Finance the project with very large sums. Beginning projects are very difficult to develop and most often they turn into scams.

[Davian144]

I often see the ico project, some are successful and some are not successful, but if the project without ico I have never seen it because every project definitely needs funds in carrying out the concept they are compiling, so I have never seen a project without ico.

[BeManga]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

its not really all non ICO project do better.. it depend of the purpose there a lot of non ico coin that not do well.. if you will look in altcoin ann there a lot of non ico coin that dont even hit exchange some of them was abandon by team because of insufficient funds for development.. some of them was use to pump and dump result is lose of funds of many investor.. before the ICO problem there are non ICO or mineable coin problem where developer release coin a lot daily to use to scam people..