No knowledge is lost.

[didzi]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

i think its because a project who didn't run an ICO usually is a serious project mate
wich mean their team member always do the best for their project with their own money
but not all project with no ICO succed, sometimes the project failed too my friend
and learn all things about the project before decided to buy is the best idea 

[BitcoinPanther]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Ethereum was one of the most successful cryptos and it started with an ICO.  Many projects have succeeded by raising funds in the start but I guess people favor a more fair pow coin that everyone can freely mine at the start.

Not all POW are successful, even those  100% premined and distributed to the community fail miserably if you look at the Announcement board of altcoin, there are lots of POW that had been long dead. OP statement is not true  thus, making it incorrect. 

[whiteblue]

I think all project for the crypto in the world should need a huge money to start up for the development and operational for many sector. It cause the project held the ICO for find the investors that want to buy some their coin. But their project must be have an amazing or different something.

all projects really need huge funds and I think the project that is currently often successful is a project that has a platform to exchange, because I see a number of other platforms currently losing to the exchange platform.

[salty]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Since You are comparing,then You should give examples of those projects that did not conduct an ICO.I know few such projects. Basically, these are projects that have been successful in IEO.And if you look at the picture in General, now there are few working projects at all(regardless of whether they conducted an ICO or not).

[tabas]

Those projects that didn't conduct no ICO at all might be sincere with what they are trying to reach the people, whilst most of the ICO projects, they're all just for the collection of money. Scammers found a way to scam easily through ICO that's why that market is becoming dangerous these days. However, there's a reinvention through IEO.

And if I may add, some of those projects who didn't conduct ICO are those that has established platform already, and they have their own funds or private investors that are sustaining the project to operate. So they are bound to success because no matter what, they are not dependent from the funds of the public community. They can proceed with their developments on their own effort and money. Whereas, those who are conducting ICO are more than likely relying on the funds that they are getting from the people, and unluckily most of them fall in the scam category.

Exactly, ICO is for funding and getting more budget to keep their project alive and to do those plans that they have. But I disagree that they are bound to success, the company might be successful in other terms but just because there's already a working company their project/tokens will be getting that success that they are expecting. Not every company that launches their own tokens becomes like that.

[cryptoblazter]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

It's not always. There were successful projects today that were once ICO's. It's not about on how these projects were funded. It's about the developers and team behind the projects. Non-ICO projects usually have good teams of developers and supports. This is one main reason to be successful.

[martabaktelor]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Many successful projects do not use ICO and I think you are right. But for now, the project without ICO is also very difficult to get investors. Investors are interested in investing because the ICO is able to raise large funds. So they think that the project can make a profit. But you must be careful in determining the project and before you join must do research.

[Bitfling]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

For example Ravencoin, this coin no premine, no ICO or fundraising and drive by community. The growth of this coin very amazing and the price always increase. Its good coin and i think this coin could be a profitable investment in the future because developers team always improve the platform

[Menawi12]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Like bitcoin, there is no ICOs and created by satoshi nakamoto and its open source. There is no CEO behind bitcoin and no authority can control the supply but bitcoin gain investor trust. I think its about trust from investor because investor must be invest on good crypto with good security

[ahmed04]

Many projects do not use public token sale. For example Telegram from Pavel Durov. A huge amount of money was raised but all the coins were bought by planned investors.

[triangles]

the answer is actually simple because the ico project is only limited to fundraising but they use funds not 100% for projects that I'm sure of, but divided by personal needs and some of the funds are 100% for personal interests (scam) and it seems like if you want to keep following dwyor.

[islafilipina]

I think without ICO has more success because they have funds already to start and operate their project and and they have resources that they need

[princeyeboah]

Knowledge is power and this same principle works in crypto. For one to turn out to be a good crypto investor, the person needs to attain adequate information about the market trend and the particular project of interest. This can only be achieved through the performance of personal researches - the best way to grab the real information.

[Bessta]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

To be honest, I haven't heard any project that didn't go through ICO. And if there is any, what you're saying is surely not always the case. It would still depend on how the team will perform and also how their product will perform. I would recommend you try to join IEO projects.

[stigmacryptonight]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

To be honest, I haven't heard any project that didn't go through ICO. And if there is any, what you're saying is surely not always the case. It would still depend on how the team will perform and also how their product will perform. I would recommend you try to join IEO projects.

I often hear of projects without ICO. What I know is why they did not do the ICO because they already had funds to develop their projects. Therefore they did not conduct ICO. And you suggest for IEO, it's actually not that different from IEO and ICO. The goal is to collect funds from investors to develop their projects.

[ttcsalam]

It is a very important thing. If you do not have this knowledge then you have to lose it. Therefore, you need to study this topic deeply. For this purpose, ideas should be invested before it.

[Delilonia1]

Knowledge they say, is power. The more an individual knows about cryptocurrency,  the easier it is to make an headway into success. The easiest way to learn is by cultivating the habit of reading and asking questions. Infact, one is safe in the multitude of good counsellors. An individual who asks question should also be ready to accept answers. And whatever one learms, even if it I not instrumental at the moment, it will definitely be at some other time. No knowledge is lost!

[samcrypto]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

It depends on their products/services they are offering, yes some succeed even if they don't have any ICO program simply because they can fund the project and they believe that it will be good for the market. On the other hand many ICO also succeeds and was able to go to the top positions and even if they don't have much money, they are being supported by the community and that is why they succeed. Good projects, means good future for them.

[Deallove9]

Many project dont have idea of what to do but only after the money and once they hit the money the whole thing turn dark again and begin killing the project from onset .

ICO suppose be the most performing project and we still have some that are from ICO and doing great in the community cis they have plan and are goal driving one to those who really after the money.

More reason ICO dont make money any more as many has detect their way of defrauding investors .

[Batalo]

For me, no ICO projects are legit and are more serious than ICO's where they already have there own budget rather than beg for the public. They have genuine staff and goals. Unlike ICO's where everything must be given and they have to hire complete strangers to advertise there company.