Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 12:17:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Let me be the first to start a bitching thread about the flags  (Read 1184 times)
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
June 12, 2019, 08:28:50 PM
 #41


The PM leaked a minute after it was sent, that's how much they trust him...
they clearly trust him enough to use his forum.

IMO, the message leaked because of the power they stand to lose.
I have to ask... who the fuck are "they"?
He's making shit up again, i.e. lying and I've tagged theymos for selectively condoning this extremely untrustworthy behaviour. The reality/truth: People stand to retain full power by just fully flipping into excluding me.

Nevermind, seems that theymos is backtracking. The time that you managed to get the author of the system to backtrack. Outplayed he indeed is.  Cheesy

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
1715257048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715257048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715257048
Reply with quote  #2

1715257048
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715257048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715257048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715257048
Reply with quote  #2

1715257048
Report to moderator
1715257048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715257048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715257048
Reply with quote  #2

1715257048
Report to moderator
1715257048
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715257048

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715257048
Reply with quote  #2

1715257048
Report to moderator
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 56


View Profile
June 12, 2019, 11:18:54 PM
 #42


The PM leaked a minute after it was sent, that's how much they trust him...
they clearly trust him enough to use his forum.

IMO, the message leaked because of the power they stand to lose.
I have to ask... who the fuck are "they"?
He's making shit up again, i.e. lying and I've tagged theymos for selectively condoning this extremely untrustworthy behaviour. The reality/truth: People stand to retain full power by just fully flipping into excluding me.

Nevermind, seems that theymos is backtracking. The time that you managed to get the author of the system to backtrack. Outplayed he indeed is.  Cheesy

Lauda again believing he is more in charge here than theymos.  Get this proven scammer blacklisted before it can do more damage.

What back tracking?? I don't see any. Let's hope he just blacklists you straight out after likely trying to allow you some dignity to be naturally voted off.  Still will look better when you are bitchslapped completely out and blacklisted by the forum owner.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
June 12, 2019, 11:22:05 PM
 #43

Lauda again believing he is more in charge here than theymos.  Get this proven scammer blacklisted before it can do more damage.
Support-wise, I probably do because his policies are part of the clown world we live in today.  Cheesy

What back tracking?? I don't see any. Let's hope he just blacklists you straight out after likely trying to allow you some dignity to be naturally voted off.  Still will look better when you are bitchslapped completely out and blacklisted by the forum owner.
He backtracked because he overplayed his hand. How he handles it now is even less relevant than it was before.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2506
Merit: 12079


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
June 12, 2019, 11:37:27 PM
 #44

The-One-Above-All
^
Only he is always b*tching and never, ever, eeeeever been asked for in any thread, thats not been created by himself Roll Eyes



XhomerX10 designed my nice avatar HATs!!!!!  Thanks Bro
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 56


View Profile
June 12, 2019, 11:41:23 PM
 #45

Lauda again believing he is more in charge here than theymos.  Get this proven scammer blacklisted before it can do more damage.
Support-wise, I probably do because his policies are part of the clown world we live in today.  Cheesy

What back tracking?? I don't see any. Let's hope he just blacklists you straight out after likely trying to allow you some dignity to be naturally voted off.  Still will look better when you are bitchslapped completely out and blacklisted by the forum owner.
He backtracked because he overplayed his hand. How he handles it now is even less relevant than it was before.

Only in a clown world would the owner of this forum ALLOW proven scammers like you to use his trust system to facilitate and hide your own scamming actions by giving red trust to whistle blowers.

You and your gang are living in the clown world. You surround yourself with beta gimps like Laudas Feltching Clown  and smarmacist and the other bunch of corrupt weak gimps.

I hope he handles it by blacklisting you. There is no place on DT for a PROVEN LIAR AND SCAMMER. Even if you were not using red trust to silence people presenting observable instances of  your prior lying and scamming you just should not be there.

The best part is suchslob has revealed herself as a back stabbing piece of shit now too. Or is that your alt lauda? she seems to risk it all to keep your account with some power??

We see no back tracking on theymos's part we see someone simply realizing now that he really did let a gang of backstabbing ,scamming, lying, extorting scum nearly take over this board.

Let's hope he blacklists the lot of you dirt bags.  ONLY those willing to work with transparent and fair rules that treat each person equally are welcome here.

Meta board means NOTHING is a tiny tiny tiny subset of this board, most devs and true supporters of this movement never even visit this shit hole meta.  Of course meta board will cry when their gravy train just got shoved off the tracks. Keep crying bitch.

Remember this you scamming piece of shit??

Closure or loss of some earnings...hmmmm. No big exchanges will risk it if they try and ban it. It won't have this much volume after the pump is done.

Don't be such an obvious pumper, at least pretend to consider some possible negatives. The fact you believe there was no instamine is the best part.


I'd rather be closed than submit to the foul government. There is no pump going on. We have just started to get the attention of some media, wait for the full impact. There was no instamine, I was there.

once you try and scam people you do not go back, you said once you were new and that was a mistake. a true legend once said to you " that is fine lauda it's never too late to leave the dark for the light"   but you were just lying you never left you just moved on to darker things. no more chances you're done.

You nearly once contributed to getting btc knocked off top position. Lucky a real legend was there to stop you Smiley
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721



View Profile
June 13, 2019, 01:01:17 AM
Merited by theymos (1)
 #46

The PM leaked a minute after it was sent, that's how much they trust him.

Are you surprised it leaked after it was sent to ~110 users?  I don't think he cared it would leak anymore than sharing his thoughts in the same way any other user could.                                                                     

Signature space available for rent.
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 01:39:13 AM
 #47

Ok, can we please try to stay on the topic of... ah I think I see the problem here... well, let's just try to bitch more about the technical details set forth in the OP than personal attacks, for which there are plenty of other threads.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12977


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:39:27 AM
 #48

Quote
I wish the "#" would be more prominent though, and the less-than-3-supporters contract violation flags had some sort of indicator too. Not red and scary, just more visible.

There are three very separate scopes for trust which need to be kept separate. Newbie-warning flags are only for warning newbies, not for warning experienced members who should know better, or for harming the target. The "#" symbol is supposed to be inconspicuous, since it's not supposed to be a warning or a "mark of shame".

(I won't rule out adding a per-post warning for newbies if people evade the per-topic warnings, though.)

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
Veleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1653


Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 01:15:49 PM
 #49

<...>

Considering that trust ratings no longer has the same effect as before, could we expect that trusts will be visible in all sections of the forum in the future?

There is also a suggestion: removing flags which don't have a single support.
NeuroticFish
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382


Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 01:28:47 PM
 #50

There is also a suggestion: removing flags which don't have a single support.

I guess that they could "undo" themselves if they don't get support in 2 days? Or 7 days?
Because even without red colors and support they can still scare newbies and maybe sometimes it's not the case.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
Veleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1653


Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2019, 06:00:52 PM
 #51

Quote
I wish the "#" would be more prominent though, and the less-than-3-supporters contract violation flags had some sort of indicator too. Not red and scary, just more visible.

There are three very separate scopes for trust which need to be kept separate. Newbie-warning flags are only for warning newbies, not for warning experienced members who should know better, or for harming the target. The "#" symbol is supposed to be inconspicuous, since it's not supposed to be a warning or a "mark of shame".

(I won't rule out adding a per-post warning for newbies if people evade the per-topic warnings, though.)

Some longstanding members, which rarely visiting Meta or Reputation, may not notice "#" symbol and can lose money because of this.

If users got warning flags, based on objective criteria, that it is dangerous to do business with them, in such a case should be a more visible icon for them.

For example:

eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262


BTC or BUST


View Profile
June 14, 2019, 06:29:23 PM
Merited by malevolent (1)
 #52

Some longstanding members, which rarely visiting Meta or Reputation, may not notice "#" symbol and can lose money because of this.

Newbie-warning flags are only for warning newbies, not for warning experienced members who should know better
The "#" symbol is supposed to be inconspicuous


Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
Veleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1653


Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2019, 07:32:24 PM
 #53

^ I believe that if member has a warning flag, then all forum users should be aware of this, regardless of ranks.

There's a chance, in my opinion, that "#" symbol could be overlooked even by some long-term users.
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2019, 08:07:16 PM
 #54

^ I believe that if member has a warning flag, then all forum users should be aware of this, regardless of ranks.

There's a chance, in my opinion, that "#" symbol could be overlooked even by some long-term users.

I think what theymos is trying to say is that he wants that to happen. Unless the user knows about newbie/guest warnings and wants to see them (for which the "#" is sufficient), there is no need to alert them.

It still sounds a bit backwards to me too (I prefer more information to be available, not less) but I doubt he's gonna budge so we need to keep that in mind when we use those flags. If needed, combine them with red trust ratings for a bit of extra exposure.
JaredKaragen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1165


My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2019, 12:21:10 AM
 #55

The-One-Above-All
^
Only he is always b*tching and never, ever, eeeeever been asked for in any thread, thats not been created by himself Roll Eyes


*saying with sarcasm*  Why is he even still allowed to post?

This user is currently ignored.

Link to my batch and script resources here.  

DO NOT TRUST YOBIT  -JK

Donations: 1Q8HjG8wMa3hgmDFbFHC9cADPLpm1xKHQM
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!