general suspicion on all forum members being scammers and spammers

[BharatDEX]

A group of DT members installed on bitcointalk general suspicion on all forum members being scammers and spammers who don't fit their moronic standards being able to earn commissions on signature campaigns.


Theymos you claim you want bitcointalk to be as much as a possible decentralized forum where people won't be able to get abused.


How does it come you allow these DT members to enforce their own rule putting all forum members who don't fit their moronic standards being put automatically equal to spammers and scammers?




Local rule only theymos is being allowed to reply to this thread which I doubt he has the balls to do so when reading old threads on Meta.

[1714923083]

1714923083

[1714923083]

1714923083

[LoyceV]

Local rule only theymos is being allowed to reply to this thread

Send a PM!

[franckuestein]

2019 and I still don't understand why there are so many drama queens on Bitcointalk.

Local rule only theymos is being allowed to reply to this thread which I doubt he has the balls to do so when reading old threads on Meta.

Create a self-moderated topic. If not...

[BharatDEX]

Quote from: theymos on January 10, 2015, 10:10:58 PM

Those were mostly replaced by self-moderated topics, but local rules can be enforced at the moderator's discretion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.[e]

@to the inexperienced staff which I basically should ignore. On Meta, you can't create self-moderated topic Mr. Brain

[suchmoon]

@to the inexperienced staff which I basically should ignore. On Meta, you can't create self-moderated topic Mr. Brain

Who forced you to create the thread in Meta, or to create a thread at all?

[BharatDEX]

@theymos I put clearly local rules on my thread.


These DT members are clearly breaking forum rules demanding at the same time to uphold the forum rules from anybody else and even Staff ignoring it.
The report button useless.



Is that the equal enforcing of rules on bitcointalk ?

These people are breaking forum rule 26 and nobody gives a shit.

[Csmiami]

Quote from: theymos on January 10, 2015, 10:10:58 PM

Those were mostly replaced by self-moderated topics, but local rules can be enforced at the moderator's discretion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.[e]

@to the inexperienced staff which I basically should ignore. On Meta, you can't create self-moderated topic Mr. Brain

Believing you are basically breaking the first rule of the forum

1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.

Why should any staff member waste their valuable time to give you the privilege of a self-moderated topic in meta?

[franckuestein]

-snip-

@to the inexperienced staff which I basically should ignore. On Meta, you can't create self-moderated topic Mr. Brain

AFAIK I didn't mention any specific section of the forum.

-snip-
Who forced you to create the thread in Meta, or to create a thread at all?

Thanks. While I was typing you replied what I was going to say.


OP: for communication between two users it's better to send a direct message instead of opening a new thread and restrict the whole community.

[mprep]

The fact that you are making a thread directed to a single member (which is what PMs are for) in a board that disallows self-moderated threads, I'm gonna go with "local rules do not apply" here. If you want theymos to reply, message him directly. If he doesn't reply, tough luck but I guess he wasn't interested in responding.