realr0ach is a danger to newbies and guests.

[Last of the V8s]

So far only TECSHARE is only opposing the red flag you have made for realr0ach and I can say that I am leaning on his side as well. The posts you have provided only voice out his opinion towards BTC. He doesn't suggest any other cryptocurrency or shill any kind of investment program towards members, there isn't even the slightest of hint that he is promoting anything else. For me his just another nocoiner messing up the forum with his opinions and false accusation to others. But if you do provide a convincing evidence that he is scamming people then I'll be on your side.

That would be grounds for a different kind of flag and hopefully much more black and white. This type is much more subjective I agree, yet proactive.

[El duderino_]

Still its not a red flag? is it? Just to take special care for reading his stuff cause a lot of it is made of delusional minded BS.... its a soft flag for just to be careful with what you gonna read

[El duderino_]

Also V8's flag is based of years of interacting with the fool in the same thread, as V8 never did outrageous claims etc
Imo this is a careful well thought FLAG and should be supported.

[Last of the V8s]

Still its not a red flag? is it? Just to take special care for reading his stuff cause a lot of it is made of delusional minded BS.... its a soft flag for just to be careful with what you gonna read

His potential flag is showing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1115697
but yeah be careful with this guy, he's not to be trusted.

[El duderino_]

Still its not a red flag? is it? Just to take special care for reading his stuff cause a lot of it is made of delusional minded BS.... its a soft flag for just to be careful with what you gonna read

His potential flag is showing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1115697
but yeah be careful with this guy, he's not to be trusted.

Yeah thats what I mean its just to read and take care while reading

[Theb]

So far only TECSHARE is only opposing the red flag you have made for realr0ach and I can say that I am leaning on his side as well. The posts you have provided only voice out his opinion towards BTC. He doesn't suggest any other cryptocurrency or shill any kind of investment program towards members, there isn't even the slightest of hint that he is promoting anything else. For me his just another nocoiner messing up the forum with his opinions and false accusation to others. But if you do provide a convincing evidence that he is scamming people then I'll be on your side.

That would be grounds for a different kind of flag and hopefully much more black and white. This type is much more subjective I agree, yet proactive.

Still the bottom line here is you haven't proven anything that realr0ach have scammed someone nor have a potential to do so to other members. It's like you are just flagging him because you have varying opinions with Bitcoin because he is a nocoiner and your not. I don't remember the exact post I made but I might have replied to one of his post about his unrealistic views towards Bitcoin and during that time I didn't see him worthy of a red tag just because of us having different opinion with BTC nor he is worthy of being flagged now.

theymos has changed the trust system just because of this reason on tagging people with personal grudges on and with no relations to any kind of trade whatsoever. Just take a look at his post stating that flags are created for "contractual violations only".

[Last of the V8s]

Theb I've shown r0ach's dishonesty in the op (as well as the stupidity you mentioned, but that is by the by). You're not up to speed with the different types of flag discussed in the theymos link you gave, nor the one here in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153820.msg51455278#msg51455278

[TECSHARE]

Theb I've shown r0ach's dishonesty in the op (as well as the stupidity you mentioned, but that is by the by). You're not up to speed with the different types of flag discussed in the theymos link you gave, nor the one here in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153820.msg51455278#msg51455278

How many times do we have to tell you it is not appropriate to flag people for their opinions. Just because you call it lies doesn't make it so. This is a clear case of abuse of the trust system.

[El duderino_]

Theb I've shown r0ach's dishonesty in the op (as well as the stupidity you mentioned, but that is by the by). You're not up to speed with the different types of flag discussed in the theymos link you gave, nor the one here in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153820.msg51455278#msg51455278

How many times do we have to tell you it is not appropriate to flag people for their opinions. Just because you call it lies doesn't make it so. This is a clear case of abuse of the trust system.

Absolutely NO abuse, I have pointed some correct things in this thread why to be warned when a member reads of the r0ach, as its a soft flag just to warn people of his intentions towards the main topic of the forum what still is BTC....

[El duderino_]

So far only TECSHARE is only opposing the red flag you have made for realr0ach and I can say that I am leaning on his side as well. The posts you have provided only voice out his opinion towards BTC. He doesn't suggest any other cryptocurrency or shill any kind of investment program towards members, there isn't even the slightest of hint that he is promoting anything else. For me his just another nocoiner messing up the forum with his opinions and false accusation to others. But if you do provide a convincing evidence that he is scamming people then I'll be on your side.

That would be grounds for a different kind of flag and hopefully much more black and white. This type is much more subjective I agree, yet proactive.

Still the bottom line here is you haven't proven anything that realr0ach have scammed someone nor have a potential to do so to other members. It's like you are just flagging him because you have varying opinions with Bitcoin because he is a nocoiner and your not. I don't remember the exact post I made but I might have replied to one of his post about his unrealistic views towards Bitcoin and during that time I didn't see him worthy of a red tag just because of us having different opinion with BTC nor he is worthy of being flagged now.

theymos has changed the trust system just because of this reason on tagging people with personal grudges on and with no relations to any kind of trade whatsoever. Just take a look at his post stating that flags are created for "contractual violations only".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153820.msg51452954#msg51452954

I still think this post explains why the 'soft just warning flag' =appropriate

Also he assume stuff about members and spread real lies over them, thats also just d*mb sh*t if you don't know anything about the involving person..., lies that other people could believe and are not grounded by anything  (so total lies of fellow members)

[TECSHARE]

So far only TECSHARE is only opposing the red flag you have made for realr0ach and I can say that I am leaning on his side as well. The posts you have provided only voice out his opinion towards BTC. He doesn't suggest any other cryptocurrency or shill any kind of investment program towards members, there isn't even the slightest of hint that he is promoting anything else. For me his just another nocoiner messing up the forum with his opinions and false accusation to others. But if you do provide a convincing evidence that he is scamming people then I'll be on your side.

That would be grounds for a different kind of flag and hopefully much more black and white. This type is much more subjective I agree, yet proactive.

Still the bottom line here is you haven't proven anything that realr0ach have scammed someone nor have a potential to do so to other members. It's like you are just flagging him because you have varying opinions with Bitcoin because he is a nocoiner and your not. I don't remember the exact post I made but I might have replied to one of his post about his unrealistic views towards Bitcoin and during that time I didn't see him worthy of a red tag just because of us having different opinion with BTC nor he is worthy of being flagged now.

theymos has changed the trust system just because of this reason on tagging people with personal grudges on and with no relations to any kind of trade whatsoever. Just take a look at his post stating that flags are created for "contractual violations only".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153820.msg51452954#msg51452954

I still think this post explains why the 'soft just warning flag' =appropriate

Also he assume stuff about members and spread real lies over them, thats also just d*mb sh*t if you don't know anything about the involving person..., lies that other people could believe and are not grounded by anything  (so total lies of fellow members)

Yeah well, I say you are really secretly a Mr. Potato Head, and you claiming not to be is a lie. See how easy that is? Grow up people and use the system to protect people, not to fight your petty fucking interpersonal disputes.

[El duderino_]

^
One thing is very sure, I know whatever that been said or done or.... you will have the last post, that no lie and seems to be a fact that that will happen.

Then again if I hate or whatever the r0ach, what I clearly don't cause I can laugh and amuse myself with his idiocy! But if I would of hate him and mis-use the system, then I would of give him red trust in the previous trust system what I didn't, cause that was to much of what he deserved.... I was not willing to scare people if he would try to buy or sell something.

Now with this system whats still new for everybody are just 3 flags, which the first is a warning for new users.... and imo appropriate, but if you don't see it fit then yes just oppose and be done with it.

Here I saw V8 created a flag and in this one my choice was easy to rather support it then oppose it.

[realr0ach]

Nice, Last of the V8s from the Popescu cult who pretends to be the ruler and dictator of Bitcoin made a thread about me.  Yes, we are all aware virtually nobody on the entire planet speaks in such a delusional, self-felatiating manner as the Popescu cult and it's members, but the fact is you are nobodies with no power over anything, and virtually none of the text material put out by the Popescu cult is even based in objective reality.  It's grandiose jibberish from a textbook example of some type of narcissist insane asylum.

But while we're on the subject of objective vs subjective, here's a dose of objective reality for you that you're going to claim is subjective when it's not:

Only idiots support digital currency over physical metals.  Why?  Because governments can and have been forced to use metals as their unit of account, which acts as a governor on fiscal recklessness and tyranny.  Is it even possible to force governments to use Bitcoin at all?  No.  Since digital shitcoins have no Schelling point, government will simply 'print' up their own digital shitcoin instead to maximize seigniorage fee they extract from their citizens slaves.

Due to digital shitcoins being entirely artificial, Keynesian constructs with no Schelling point, there is no way possible to stop government from doing this.  Government cannot just 'print' up a new gold or silver, though.  In the end, shilling for completely artificial, Keynesian, digital Ponzi tokens will accomplish absolutely nothing besides giving credence to the cashless society, government tracking and slavery token the state wants to create and impose on you. Casting a vote for any artificial, digital token is simply empowering the state.

[mindrust]

I am not sure if being a master troll deserves a red scammer flag. I know the new trust system made it unnecessarily complex and sucks but it is how it is now.

The best punishment for roach is ignoring him completely.

[nutildah]

I am not sure if being a master troll deserves a red scammer flag.

Its actually the yellow-type flag, not red. Yellow is might scam, red is did scam.

I know the new trust system made it unnecessarily complex and sucks but it is how it is now.
The best punishment for roach is ignoring him completely.

These statements are both true.

[realr0ach]

The best punishment for roach is ignoring him completely.

Aren't dangerous individuals supposed to be banned to protect the children, though?

https://www.npr.org/2019/05/03/719897599/facebook-bans-alex-jones-louis-farrakhan-and-other-dangerous-individuals

[TECSHARE]

Nice, Last of the V8s from the Popescu cult who pretends to be the ruler and dictator of Bitcoin made a thread about me.  Yes, we are all aware virtually nobody on the entire planet speaks in such a delusional, self-felatiating manner as the Popescu cult and it's members, but the fact is you are nobodies with no power over anything, and virtually none of the text material put out by the Popescu cult is even based in objective reality.  It's grandiose jibberish from a textbook example of some type of narcissist insane asylum.

But while we're on the subject of objective vs subjective, here's a dose of objective reality for you that you're going to claim is subjective when it's not:

Only idiots support digital currency over physical metals.  Why?  Because governments can and have been forced to use metals as their unit of account, which acts as a governor on fiscal recklessness and tyranny.  Is it even possible to force governments to use Bitcoin at all?  No.  Since digital shitcoins have no Schelling point, government will simply 'print' up their own digital shitcoin instead to maximize seigniorage fee they extract from their citizens slaves.

Due to digital shitcoins being entirely artificial, Keynesian constructs with no Schelling point, there is no way possible to stop government from doing this.  Government cannot just 'print' up a new gold or silver, though.  In the end, shilling for completely artificial, Keynesian, digital Ponzi tokens will accomplish absolutely nothing besides giving credence to the cashless society, government tracking and slavery token the state wants to create and impose on you. Casting a vote for any artificial, digital token is simply empowering the state.

Well, shit... I didn't know V8 was part of "the Popescu cult", but now that is out in the open it makes a lot of sense. That retard and his friends have been coming after me for years. Back on exclusion you go V8...

[Last of the V8s]

lol
links?

[El duderino_]

lol
links?

Time to use your time for better purpose, this could go for XXX pages with still the same outcome, where r0ach will stay the delusional idiote he is and TEC will keep arguing till he dies for pointless and stupid sh*t .......


(if one doesn't agree that the r0ach is an idiote and the biggest troll on the forum, where people have to take care with not because he have done something! But still its a member where its appropriate to say take care with dealing with!  Then your the idiote to disagree imo)

[Last of the V8s]

altcoins? woodcollector? emotional outbursts and incomplete truth in the red trust department? gosh that guy really has made good progress since those heady days.

lol
links?

Time to use your time for better purpose, this could go for XXX pages with still the same outcome, where r0ach will stay the delusional idiote he is and TEC will keep arguing till he dies for pointless and stupid sh*t .......


(if one doesn't agree that the r0ach is an idiote and the biggest troll on the forum, where people have to take care with not because he have done something! But still its a member where its appropriate to say take care with dealing with!  Then your the idiote to disagree imo)

aww it was just getting interesting, but you're right of course.