Re - "FAIR TREATMENT FOR ALL."

[marlboroza]

As my on topic reply has been removed from self moderated thread and I am not allowed to post there any more until I counter some Lauda's tags I have to ask here:

A UNION TO ENSURE THE FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD (and nothing more)
[...]
Do you have a trust flag raised or red trust (old system) against you that is unfair? have you never scammed or acted in a way it is clear that you are intending to scam someone?
[...]
Set up your flags or present flags where you have been abused. Let's review them together.

Can you review my case?

I have been wrongly tagged by 2 accounts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1099851
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2493489

Look:



These abusive idiots abused trust system and placed wrong feedback on my trust wall and no one cares about it.

Please review and when you are done with these 2 cases I have more of this abusive behavior. We don't want double standards here, equal treatment for all!

Those look to be incorrect feedbacks from the initial review.

Although you fall under the direct support of scammers (with direct regard to their scamming) category (we have added)  for your direct support of laudas proven scamming actions. Unless you want to prove us wrong right now.

We will quote your post before we delete it to demonstrate this is the action we will take against any persons seeking to use the union for their own ends but are not prepared AT ALL to support its true goals. When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing  are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation.

Anyone here that seeks to disrupt the union by any means will be deleted. Any not considering that FAIR may choose not to join this union. If you have used the trust system previously to create an initial attack that is not directly related to financial wrong doing you are a trust abuser.

This is not a one way street. You want the union to ensure YOUR OWN fair treatment then you must ENSURE the fair treatment of others.

We believe focusing on flags should be the primary initial concern. The old system is now correctly viewed as meaningless subjective junk.

This part:

When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing  are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation.

Does it apply to every DT who does not counter lauda's feedback or there will be no equal treatment for all members?

And as I don't know which lauda's feedback is wrongly placed (OP of that thread didn't say which one is abusive), how should I know which to counter?

I see bunch of words there and my post is removed from thread with edited topic. Perhaps OP should update that thread with wrongly placed -ve so we can discuss it?

Oh, yes, not self moderated. It is not cool to self moderate "fair treatment for all".

[The-One-Above-All]

As my on topic reply has been removed from self moderated thread and I am not allowed to post there any more until I counter some Lauda's tags I have to ask here:

A UNION TO ENSURE THE FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD (and nothing more)

Set up your flags or present flags where you have been abused. Let's review them together.

Can you review my case?

I have been wrongly tagged by 2 accounts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1099851
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2493489

Look:



These abusive idiots abused trust system and placed wrong feedback on my trust wall and no one cares about it.

Please review and when you are done with these 2 cases I have more of this abusive behavior. We don't want double standards here, equal treatment for all!

Those look to be incorrect feedbacks from the initial review.

Although you fall under the direct support of scammers (with direct regard to their scamming) category (we have added)  for your direct support of laudas proven scamming actions. Unless you want to prove us wrong right now.

We will quote your post before we delete it to demonstrate this is the action we will take against any persons seeking to use the union for their own ends but are not prepared AT ALL to support its true goals. When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing  are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation.

Anyone here that seeks to disrupt the union by any means will be deleted. Any not considering that FAIR may choose not to join this union. If you have used the trust system previously to create an initial attack that is not directly related to financial wrong doing you are a trust abuser.

This is not a one way street. You want the union to ensure YOUR OWN fair treatment then you must ENSURE the fair treatment of others.

We believe focusing on flags should be the primary initial concern. The old system is now correctly viewed as meaningless subjective junk.

This part:

When we take note that you have countered LAUDAS tags and flags where observable instances of financial wrongdoing  are not present you may apply via pm to be part of the union. Until then do not post again. Others that have supported lauda and trust abuse previously will be deleted without being given the SAME explanation.

Does it apply to every DT who does not counter lauda's feedback or there will be no equal treatment for all members?

And as I don't know which lauda's feedback is wrongly placed (OP of that thread didn't say which one is abusive), how should I know which to counter?

I see bunch of words there and my post is removed from thread with edited topic. Perhaps OP should update that thread with wrongly placed -ve so we can discuss it?

Oh, yes, not self moderated. It is not cool to self moderate "fair treatment for all".

your post is not removed it is there for all to read. If they do not agree with the removal they need not join the union. They are free to take action to assist you . You have benefitted from our generous page space we have allowed you to retain.
yes sorry SM is needed, or we will have scammers, supporters of scammers and trust abusers trying to derail and spoil our efforts and waste our time. The union is not a one way street.

Start with our own feeback since there are not as yet other member of the union?

Reverse or counter all feedback that you can not demonstrate direct clear connection to scamming. Then start a trust flag for the proven scamming of lauda relating to the lying and scamming over the xcoin instamine. 

Then we can talk further on THIS THREAD about your possible serious application to become a union member. If that is what you really want to become. YOU have to understand that previous trust abusers and scammer supports must be grilled thoroughly because we can not allow those with any relation to scams or scammers or trust abuse - to join.

Thanks for understanding.

[marlboroza]

your post is not removed it is there for all to read.

I am pretty sure my post is removed:

Start with our own feeback since there are not as yet other member of the union?

I might check feedback when you share your opinion about this case https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105750.0, give me your review and give your opinion on flagging account Rambotic in that thread.

And, after you give me answer to this question:

So you wouldn't know anything about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143794.0 ?[...]

Reverse or counter all feedback that you can not demonstrate direct clear connection to scamming.

Again, which feedback should I counter or remove?

Then start a trust flag for the proven scamming of lauda relating to the lying and scamming over the xcoin instamine. 

I believe you can create flag yourself. Go and create one, see how it will work.

[actmyname]

Reverse or counter all feedback that you can not demonstrate direct clear connection to scamming.

Again, which feedback should I counter or remove?

You can't exactly "counter" feedback anymore. It makes no sense to mark someone with positive reputation as there is no effect on the "trust score".

The -1 distinct negative feedback will still remain. Given that theymos wants users to now start relying more on reading feedback, a neutral feedback would be more viable.

[marlboroza]

Bumping this because I am not satisfied with answers posted by the-one-above-all. I believe you had enough time to go trough trust feedback, can you come here and clarify questions asked a month ago?

[xolxol]

Bumping this because I am not satisfied with answers posted by the-one-above-all. I believe you had enough time to go trough trust feedback, can you come here and clarify questions asked a month ago?

What you can do is to fix all the your wrongdoings from the past,you know it by yourself which system you abused and do not think countering lauda's feedbacks from the past will clean your hands.You have been part of his campaign to tag those who oppose them,we arent dumb enough to think that you are now opposing him its clearly just because he was outcast from the table  and now losing his power ....and here you are now!

[marlboroza]

What you can do is to fix all the your wrongdoings from the past,you know it by yourself which system you abused and do not think countering lauda's feedbacks from the past will clean your hands.You have been part of his campaign to tag those who oppose them,we arent dumb enough to think that you are now opposing him its clearly just because he was outcast from the table  and now losing his power ....and here you are now!

Hello Mr. sockpuppet, for someone who claim they are not dumb you are very dumb. "And I am here now" because...read topic. If you want to discuss unrelated things create new thread for them.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

we arent dumb enough to think that you are now opposing him its clearly just because he was outcast from the table  and now losing his power ....and here you are now!

Who is "we"?  And no, you're dumb enough to believe anything and spout incessantly about whatever hare-brained conspiracy theory comes into your tiny little noggin.  You're a troll, so somebody pass the troll spray.

Hello Mr. sockpuppet, for someone who claim they are not dumb you are very dumb.

Yeah, and I'm just wondering who's sock this dude is.  Could be any of a number of members with similar delusions.

[xolxol]

we arent dumb enough to think that you are now opposing him its clearly just because he was outcast from the table  and now losing his power ....and here you are now!

Who is "we"?  And no, you're dumb enough to believe anything and spout incessantly about whatever hare-brained conspiracy theory comes into your tiny little noggin.  You're a troll, so somebody pass the troll spray.

Hello Mr. sockpuppet, for someone who claim they are not dumb you are very dumb.

Yeah, and I'm just wondering who's sock this dude is.  Could be any of a number of members with similar delusions.

everyone who opposes your gang are trolls what a mindset i really like to mindfuck you guys.

[suchmoon]

your gang

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

[xolxol]

your gang

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

[bones261]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

     If you are going to put forth this theory, you need to get some facts straight.
1) Lauda excluded the Pharmacist from her trust list. If Lauda was truly a champion for him, this was an odd way to go about it.
2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

[Foxpup]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

If there are no objections, I'd like to apply for Lauda's former position. I have the requisite number of DT exclusions and accusations of sockpuppetry and merit/trust/gender-quota abuse, with additional examples of impropriety available on request.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Stop interacting with these idiots.

[xolxol]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

     If you are going to put forth this theory, you need to get some facts straight.
1) Lauda excluded the Pharmacist from her trust list. If Lauda was truly a champion for him, this was an odd way to go about it.
2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

dude it doesnt make sense,anyone can do that,excluding him doesnt justify that he wasnt part of the gang...thepharmacist is like leech,if you dont have blood he wont suck you 

[AdolfinWolf]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

First time i heard about this? Any link to what happend/why? just curious.

dude it doesnt make sense,anyone can do that,excluding him doesnt justify that he wasnt part of the gang...thepharmacist is like leech,if you dont have blood he wont suck you  

Quite the misplaced analogy, don't you think?

[Joel_Jantsen]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

First time i heard about this? Any link to what happend/why? just curious.

Follow the drama here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg51765169#msg51765169

[The-One-Above-All]

Bumping this because I am not satisfied with answers posted by the-one-above-all. I believe you had enough time to go trough trust feedback, can you come here and clarify questions asked a month ago?

1. you first examine the trust abuse against our own account. If you can find no direct instances of scamming people out of money or goods or trying to then you will do your best to encourage these trust abusers to remove their abuse or you will counter it.

2. If you are unable to ascertain which red tags they are (the clue is all of them) then you are obviously not cut out for the union. I mean there is no point people joining if they are unsure of what is scamming people out of money or goods or directly attempting to scam them out of money and goods IS?  I mean you can not help support a movement that wants to ensure people are not accused of things they are not guilty of if you are unable to understand the basic principles.

3. Actually most of our "feedback" is observable untrue since the very wording of their trust abuse describes actions that are false.I mean the difference between vods feedback and the others feedback is contradictory and laughable ...

We may check back here to appraise your progress from time to time. Although not that often since we are busy with more important matters. There is some grass that we like to watch grow and some paint that we like to watch dry ... all these exciting and far more involving challenges.

[AdolfinWolf]

Wait, is it The Pharmacist's gang now? I really need to know who I should report to, now that Lauda has disappeared in mysterious circumstances.

dont be an idiot,you know its lauda's gang which includes morons like whom defending abusive members like the pharmacist.

2) Lauda has recently been blacklisted from DT1. (She still is on DT2 though.) With this recent development, the "gang" needs to be reorganized.

First time i heard about this? Any link to what happend/why? just curious.

Follow the drama here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg51765169#msg51765169

I still don't understand the "why" behind blacklisting him though. ..But..  it seems like nobody does..?

[marlboroza]

2. If you are unable to ascertain which red tags they are (the clue is all of them)

You said lauda's tags and flags so lets stick to it:

Shill account used to spread defamatory bullshit and attack established forum members. Untrustworthy.

I have read thread in reference and feedback is factual. You attacked hh because someone rented signature space, and you call them liars, scammers etc. About flag, I have read thread linked in flag but I will have to wait for:

moronbozo

...to come from vacation and see what they think about it.