Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com propaganda against bitcoin

[chek2fire]

Here is the last attempt of negative propaganda against Bitcoin from Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com



is obvious that their bcash shitcoin is dying with a small group of community, a shitcoin with zero usage(even Dogecoin have x10 more usage than this), with empty blocks(most blocks not have even 100kb) and with small group of devs that no one want to donate them.
This propaganda are desperate actions from Roger Ver and have a zero impact to Bitcoin.

[1715452554]

1715452554

[1715452554]

1715452554

[1715452554]

1715452554

[AB de Royse777]

It's fascinating how they kept the same color for 1 and 3, and the gray color (trying to mean that it's outdated) for Bitcoin :-P

This Roger shit's BCH and Craig shit's BSV are misdirections like XRP shit.

[partysaurus]

Here is the last attempt of negative propaganda against Bitcoin from Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com



is obvious that their bcash shitcoin is dying with a small group of community, a shitcoin with zero usage(even Dogecoin have x10 more usage than this), with empty blocks(most blocks not have even 100kb) and with small group of devs that no one want to donate them.
This propaganda are desperate actions from Roger Ver and have a zero impact to Bitcoin.

this has been a problem for awhile and still is a ongoing problem that a imposter is running bitcoin.com and ALOT of people visit it when they are new to btc and want to find out what it is. we have to keep on informing people that its a scammer running it and to stay away.

[NeuroticFish]

From what I see everybody is quoting the original post, with image. That helps Ver, not Bitoin; some will not read the posts and will just see the highlights, you know that, right?
I'm glad the OP didn't include also link to the article, then Ver wold have got some free backlinks too.

Ver does this bad propaganda for almost 2 years now. I'm unpleasantly surprised that there was no good solution found yet against him.
At least I've reported it to WOT for misleading content...

[1Referee]

It's better to refer to his site as bitcoin dot com or roger dot com instead of typing the domain as it is, which only boosts his scam site.

In the end, let Roger do as he wants. It's clear that he's only shooting himself in the foot with all this weak minded propaganda. It also shows how desperate he is because his BCash scam coin needs artificial transaction inflation to make it appear popular, while in reality only his minions are using it.

People are turning against him, just read through the Twitter comments under his posts.

[chek2fire]

It's better to refer to his site as bitcoin dot com or roger dot com instead of typing the domain as it is, which only boosts his scam site.

In the end, let Roger do as he wants. It's clear that he's only shooting himself in the foot with all this weak minded propaganda. It also shows how desperate he is because his BCash scam coin needs artificial transaction inflation to make it appear popular, while in reality only his minions are using it.

People are turning against him, just read through the Twitter comments under his posts.

i cant, i am blocked from day one and banned from r/btc months before. And he says about censorship

[gentlemand]

It is literally only him and his wee friends that use that phrase. No one else is going to have much of a clue what he's on about. It makes him look stupid and irrelevant, not authoritative. The longer you attempt to hold back the tide the faster it claims you when it gets some momentum.

[Johnzky]

Here is the last attempt of negative propaganda against Bitcoin from Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com



is obvious that their bcash shitcoin is dying with a small group of community, a shitcoin with zero usage(even Dogecoin have x10 more usage than this), with empty blocks(most blocks not have even 100kb) and with small group of devs that no one want to donate them.
This propaganda are desperate actions from Roger Ver and have a zero impact to Bitcoin.

What do we expect from this guys?aside from being desperate and will do anything just to pump his BitcoinshitCash?but don’t worry because in the end of the day what will happen to BCh will die together with his desire to be known as creator of original Bitcoin

[CryptoBry]

I just realized that there are two famous personalities -- Roger Ver and Craig Wright -- which the real bitcoin community don't like as these two are full of lies and "shits" just so they promote their own self-vested agenda. Yes, they are still laughing to the bank and they may even continue sowing their menace but people in the community are sure that these self-professing cryptocurrency leaders are not representing the voice and the support of the greater number of people in this industry. In fact, we should be considering as just clowns and good for entertainment, at least they have more value on this aspect.

[Kakmakr]

The thing with Roger Ver is this, he was part of the early adopters of Bitcoin and he made a shitload of money from buying BTC coins cheap and selling them for a huge profit. He wants to repeat this "event" with a new coin <A coin that he got for free, from the forked coins that he got from BTC> and the only way for him to do this is to hype up BCash for others to buy more Bitcoin Cash coins.

He is using all the dirty tricks in the books to fool people into buying BCash, because this will increase the demand and his FREE coins will increase in value. When it reach a high peak, he will dump his coins for another massive profit and the other people will be the bag holders.  

[jerry0]

Does anyone find roger ver annoying with his tweets?  He keeps talking about bitcoin cash... fine.  But he is so against btc.  What is his purpose?  It's like a stupid discussion and argument... what's the point?

[o_e_l_e_o]

a shitcoin with zero usage(even Dogecoin have x10 more usage than this), with empty blocks(most blocks not have even 100kb) and with small group of devs that no one want to donate them.

Pretty much this. We just saw the other day that bitcoin now has over 1 million daily active addresses. BCH has around 3% of this number (source: https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin%20cash/). Transaction times are fast and fees are low only because there are barely any transactions taking place. Their blocks are sitting almost empty, at around 1-2% of max capacity. A mining pool decided to use a 51% attack on BCH last month to "correct" some transactions they didn't like. This was easily done because their hashrate is so low. The fact that this is even possible means that BCH is no longer decentralized or censorship resistance. One mining pool has complete power over BCH, if they want it.

It is a failed coin kept alive by bag holders trying to lure in newbies.

[rdluffy]

This person with a few others are frustrated because the community did not choose Bitcoin Cash, but they gained tons of money with this fork, I don´t know what else they want...

[gentlemand]

A mining pool decided to use a 51% attack on BCH last month to "correct" some transactions they didn't like. This was easily done because their hashrate is so low. The fact that this is even possible means that BCH is no longer decentralized or censorship resistance. One mining pool has complete power over BCH, if they want it.

It's remarkable how little mention this got considering it's the 'real Bitcoin'. If the 'fake Bitcoin' did this everyone would pulls their pants over their head and run around screaming. It pretty much says it all.

[o_e_l_e_o]

It's remarkable how little mention this got considering it's the 'real Bitcoin'. If the 'fake Bitcoin' did this everyone would pulls their pants over their head and run around screaming. It pretty much says it all.

People don't understand just how terrible this is for a coin. Take EOS as another example. It is completely controlled by 21 "Block Producers". The very design of EOS (their "constitution", as they call it) gives these block producers the power to reverse transactions, freeze accounts, and seize your coins, and there is nothing you can do about it. This isn't even a bug, it's a feature. EOS remains the most successful ICO of all time, and currently has a marketcap of over $6 billion.

A majority of users don't understand the tech behind various coins. This is especially true of BCH, where the majority of users are newbies who have been tricked in to buying BCH by Ver and his shills thinking it is BTC. If you understand just how bad a single pool being able to 51% attack a coin is, then you understand the difference between BTC and BCH, and you are already staying well away from that trash.

[shield132]

I don't think that it's correct how he blames bitcoin now, it's not a right action from man but it's a business too at the same time and he tries to promote his product which is normal, wouldn't you do the same? Will you promote someone's shop when you own your one? Of course no. He tries to show good sides of his coin and can't blame for it. Bitcoin cash isn't shitcoin too, that's not correct to name that coin this way.
I don't say he is right but that's a business and that's all. Hope you guys won't blame me for making Roger somehow right but what I said is truth, just his propaganda isn't right because he says some wrong things on bitcoin.

[serjent05]

It's remarkable how little mention this got considering it's the 'real Bitcoin'. If the 'fake Bitcoin' did this everyone would pulls their pants over their head and run around screaming. It pretty much says it all.

People don't understand just how terrible this is for a coin.

Or probably people just ignore this coin since it just a shitcoin for them

Take EOS as another example. It is completely controlled by 21 "Block Producers". The very design of EOS (their "constitution", as they call it) gives these block producers the power to reverse transactions, freeze accounts, and seize your coins, and there is nothing you can do about it. This isn't even a bug, it's a feature. EOS remains the most successful ICO of all time, and currently has a marketcap of over $6 billion.

Furthermore EOS staking favors the developer, they got 4% of the 5% annual stake.  A good way for developers to enrich themselves.

A majority of users don't understand the tech behind various coins.

I believe if people are into tech, I guess Bitcoin had been dethroned already so I guess it work bothways .  

This is especially true of BCH, where the majority of users are newbies who have been tricked in to buying BCH by Ver and his shills thinking it is BTC.

Just being fair Bitcoin have shills too  .  Though we don't have to lie like those of BCH shills just to attract new investors.

If you understand just how bad a single pool being able to 51% attack a coin is, then you understand the difference between BTC and BCH, and you are already staying well away from that trash.

That is really bad, and this action only means one thing,  we must not trust this BCH because they not only manipulate the market, they also manipulate the blockchain flow, even reverse it if it is beneficial to them.

[Harlot]

He has been making people believe that Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin is the same thing for a long time now but I'm pretty sure that this kinds of tactics of misleading people that Bitcoin and Bitcoin cash is the same is illegal, I just wonder why there are no groups of people taking action against his direty tactics. They are deceiving people or making them believe that Bitcoin cash is a cheaper version of BTC which they have the opportunity to buy more since it's just a fraction of the value of BTC.

[carlfebz2]

From what I see everybody is quoting the original post, with image. That helps Ver, not Bitoin; some will not read the posts and will just see the highlights, you know that, right?
I'm glad the OP didn't include also link to the article, then Ver wold have got some free backlinks too.

Ver does this bad propaganda for almost 2 years now. I'm unpleasantly surprised that there was no good solution found yet against him.
At least I've reported it to WOT for misleading content...

I'm actually saying the same thing where instead on reading up someones post or replies but those images is always been quoted which is painful in the eyes.
I'm aint surprised for this shit propaganda not only to Ver but also into others as well who do still continue to attack BTC.This is indeed a very misleading content that should really be
reported but even though if there were no actions taken,people/community does know on whats the truth the only sad thing that pure newbies would really be misleaded.

[dothebeats]

I view Roger Ver as a somewhat passable man sans the shots he had been firing bitcoin ever since he had this miscommunication with the core devs. All of what he does is basically just him trying to prop his failed iteration of bitcoin, just like a telemarketer trying to do outbound calls on uninterested prospects. Anyway, he could go on and rant all he wants, but we all know the story: BCH is a failure and only those pump and dump traders together with his die-hard fanatics and close friends would ever be interested in BCH.

A mining pool decided to use a 51% attack on BCH last month to "correct" some transactions they didn't like. This was easily done because their hashrate is so low. The fact that this is even possible means that BCH is no longer decentralized or censorship resistance. One mining pool has complete power over BCH, if they want it.

It is a failed coin kept alive by bag holders trying to lure in newbies.

This. Knowing that a single entity could cause a major problem in the network, why would anyone even use your creation?