This is not fair, LFC_Bitcoin

[ThatRandom8543]

Its surprising it took the creation of this thread for OP to realize that LFC was within his right to leave a negative feedback. Any user has the right to leave a feedback on any user as they deem it necessary, which can be a caution to other users, or give other users their feedback on how things went when dealing with the user. While not every person who ask for a loan gets a negative feedback (a few rare cases from what ive seen), a user who is new, has not posted in an extremely long time (eg 6+ months), recently changed email and/or password (and cant prove ownership), has no realistic trust, positive trading history, or no good and constructive post that ask for a loan will 99% of the time will take the money and not pay a sat back.

Its probably best for OP to go on and lock this thread since it looks like things are now figured out and it serve no further purpose other than for people to rant.

[1714838201]

1714838201

[1714838201]

1714838201

[1714838201]

1714838201

[El duderino_]

Imo nothing wrong and the warning is @ its place.... Just asking a loan without collateral = shady and will go wrong in many cases, so a warning is due and then the members can decide what they do, probably ignore....

T'ill today I have had two people asking me for a loan (BTC-loan), still not knowing I did good with not tagging them actually, also been a while, going through my PM's and see what I will do with those....

[creeps]

Being a hero account doesn't mean you can't scam, everyone can scam people despite of their rankings just like on the previous loan before with other lender.

Having a 2 declined loan application before is not a good history after all, he must know how to provide collateral if he can really pay the amount of the loan. I appreciate the effort of LFC_Bitcoin to warn the lender because he might got lose big money, I guess it can still be deleted if there's no transactions being made well its all up to LFC_Bitcoin. This is not unfair, this is just a fair warning.

[LoyceV]

I don’t really see how anybody can question it to be honest.

• He has 0 verified positive trust for previous trades
• He has no collateral

• He is wearing a sig & avatar for a campaign he isn’t even accepted in
• He has previous unfulfilled loan applications

If anybody has an issue with my feedback they’re welcome to prove me wrong & risk lending him thd 0.05BTC but I somehow think that won’t happen.

I noticed your negative feedback before this topic was opened. On the one hand, I too think it was a bit harsh. But on the other hand, the request for an "education loan" without saying how he's planning to pay it back, looks a lot like an exit scam. 0.05 BTC is a lot of money for that account.

T'ill today I have had two people asking me for a loan (BTC-loan), still not knowing I did good with not tagging them actually, also been a while, going through my PM's and see what I will do with those....

Unless it's someone you've done business with before, asking someone who's not in the lending business for a loan is even more shady. That just means they assume you're an easy source of money.

[xolxol]

Is there going to be an interrogation in Reputation every time some random 0 trust account gets red trust?
The OP has no place questioning this, the fucking idiot.

if it comes from abuser like you there will be,smegma,copy paste redtag abuser like you should be remove from your awful unrightful position.

[El duderino_]

Is there going to be an interrogation in Reputation every time some random 0 trust account gets red trust?
The OP has no place questioning this, the fucking idiot.

if it comes from abuser like you there will be,smegma,copy paste redtag abuser like you should be remove from your awful unrightful position.

Still I would instant loan LFC some in BTC, I wouldn't trust you

So why is he in a unrightfully position?? Seems like the only position where he as a to trust member should be ....

[xolxol]

Is there going to be an interrogation in Reputation every time some random 0 trust account gets red trust?
The OP has no place questioning this, the fucking idiot.

if it comes from abuser like you there will be,smegma,copy paste redtag abuser like you should be remove from your awful unrightful position.

Still I would instant loan LFC some in BTC, I wouldn't trust you

So why is he in a unrightfully position?? Seems like the only position where he as a to trust member should be ....

what the?i really dont understand what are you trying to say.Let me guess your an asslicker,trying to get some trust from abusers like them.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Is there going to be an interrogation in Reputation every time some random 0 trust account gets red trust?
The OP has no place questioning this, the fucking idiot.

if it comes from abuser like you there will be,smegma,copy paste redtag abuser like you should be remove from your awful unrightful position.

Still I would instant loan LFC some in BTC, I wouldn't trust you

So why is he in a unrightfully position?? Seems like the only position where he as a to trust member should be ....

Ignore him mic, he’s just another butt hurt Russian shit poster who has a worthless account due to red trust.

[Quickseller]

Based on LFC_Bitcoin’s response here, his trust rating, among other things, I have excluded him from my trust list. I would encourage others to do the same.

You can exclude him from your trust list by adding the following to your trust list:

Code:

~LFC_Bitcoin

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Sadly for you, Quickscammer, nobody that matters will do this. Have fun recruiting a load of red trusted shit posters with less than 250 Merits between them, therefore, unable to have a say on anything.

I would suggest people distrust you but you’re already so distrusted & shamed across the whole bitcointalk.org community that there doesn’t seem a point.

Have a great day!

Edit - Just for the LOLS - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=358020

[xolxol]

Russian shit poster who has a worthless account due to red trust.

i guess you arent stupid at all!  im sorry but you're a wanker,rubbish racist douche twat.
Im not a russian einstein.

[The-One-Above-All]

Sadly for you, Quickscammer, nobody that matters will do this. Have fun recruiting a load of red trusted shit posters with less than 250 Merits between them, therefore, unable to have a say on anything.

I would suggest people distrust you but you’re already so distrusted & shamed across the whole bitcointalk.org community that there doesn’t seem a point.

Have a great day!

Edit - Just for the LOLS - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=358020

LFC bitcoin should be excluded from trust lists

This message confirms he is merely a bitch for others that are confirmed scammers and liars like lauda

bill, I feel like a right ass hole but Lauda messaged me ... about you. She told me I should remove you from my trust list. I really didn’t want to do it because I do like you (a lot).

For my own comfort & to make my life easier I did it. I don’t want to get on the wrong side of them.

I am really sorry & I feel a dick for doing it. I had to tell you myself though before you see it yourself.

I hope you can forgive me.

LFC

Laudas Feltching Clown

How can such a pathetic dreg be on DT. A weasel and puppet.

In this instance it is gray, i don't like no collateral loans but if a senior member wishes to risk his account hero/legend for a very small loan then this could be viewed as leverage to get them to repay. I expect the account would be worth more if they sold it than this. Not that we support selling accounts either.

Really it should not be a red trust for hero to ask for such a tiny loan as non collateral - certainly NOT a flag now. It is the responsibility of the person loaning to do their own DD. We should not ask potentially innocent members to be paying for the greed and stupidity of others. You could view their rep and work to build the account as leverage to some degree.