This is part of a month long experiment I'm running.
Basically, it will answer the following question: Can selecting sports bets with high odds (I'm talking 2.0+)
randomly possibly be more profitable in a month than following an online betting system?
In this experiment, I will tail an online tipster's "Free picks". This particular tipster sells "premium tips" at expensive rates of $30 per tip per day. Basically, I hypothesize that selecting bets by random chance will yield better rates. This is because on reddit, there are many people who have made the claim that because this guy advertises sportsbooks on his site, it means that the books he advertises offer him a percentage of your losses if you bet there. On the contrary, I could have also faded this tipster.
I will also include a group that tails bets from reddit, mimicking
this experiment . I will use this as a control group. It will tail the most popular tips, that have the least disagreements.
What do you guys think, can I beat online tipsters by selecting random tips?