mydogedice is very likely scam

[marlboroza]

Site: mydogedice.com

Accounts: doge-games, mydogedice1

Mydogedice created thread https://archive.fo/UooJF for site which had not provably dice and some kind of money making scheme inside https://archive.fo/OJSOd (I couldn't archive page inside, however, there was no information about bankroll nor income), from thread:

-Cloud Miner: 0.9% day | 27% month
- You can invest in a company, we pay 0.9% per day in DogeCoin currency

There is no information about company.
No ToS.
Dice is not provably fair.

They have removed investment option but dice is still not provably fair:



And account doge-games starts new thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157148.0 archived http://archive.is/yDu47.

I can't create another flag for doge-games 

[1714894532]

1714894532

[1714894532]

1714894532

[1714894532]

1714894532

[Patatas]

Well, we can create a flag but that won't be enough since no one has directly got scammed by the service yet. The red-text -the label is important for the newbies to know to avoid the site. For now, you seemed to have already tagged them.

[marlboroza]

Someone suggested to create thread in scam accusation for flags but I didn't know that I can't create flag for the same user 2 times within 180 days (thread for first flag was deleted so yellow flag is not valid). I guess tag should be enough but to be honest I don't like new system at all. In old system it was enough to place tag and add link for reference, now we should create new thread or something for every flag. We can also move 99% of investor based games to scam accusation for flags, or am I missing something again?

[doge-games]

Hello my friend
We have already canceled investments on the site!
On the project you can only play dice!
You have not rightly called me a fraud!
You tell me how to do it right, we will create another project, we are new in this case

Write me:
support@mydogedice.com

I will add:
The other day I'll post a video game

[/b]

[suchmoon]

we should create new thread or something for every flag

Technically yes. But for identical issues you can create one thread along the lines of "Here's a bunch of ponzi scams: thread1, thread2, ...." and then use it as reference on multiple flags.

Can we use a community thread for flagging potential scammers? I ask because it says you can create 1 thread if you tag flag many users, or can this be a simple thread that states I flag people for these reasons and leave it at that.

Yes, but make sure that if someone goes there, it's clear what the flag is about.

Scammer flags should usually each have distinct topics.

[mosprognoz]

Hello my friend
You have not rightly called me a fraud!

Hello my scammy friend.

[magneto]

Hello my friend
We have already canceled investments on the site!
On the project you can only play dice!
You have not rightly called me a fraud!
You tell me how to do it right, we will create another project, we are new in this case

Write me:
support@mydogedice.com

I will add:
The other day I'll post a video game

[/b]

There is every evidence that your intention was to scam.

If you disagree, please justify how you were going to offer a "cloud miner" investment scheme, promising returns of 0.9% per day. You only removed this after the scam accusation was initiated, but that doesn't mean that you were intending on running a ponzi.

Also, please, tell us why you aren't able to make the dice provably fair.

The two facts combined is a strong case of not trusting you with any sum of money, because you have shown the willingness to lie about the returns that you can generate sustainably and running a ponzi scheme, as well as operating a potentially rigged casino.