sportbettor (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
 |
June 25, 2019, 04:06:54 PM
Last edit: April 20, 2023, 03:56:00 PM by sportbettor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
avikz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1500
|
|
June 25, 2019, 04:21:04 PM |
|
Please note down the parametera based kn which you have rated the websites. Otherwise it literally no sense for anyone to belive in your ratings.
Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 25, 2019, 05:31:10 PM |
|
Please note down the parametera based kn which you have rated the websites. Otherwise it literally no sense for anyone to belive in your ratings.
Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??
Unfortunately, it is impossible to make a rating that will suit all players, as each player considers their favorite bookmakers the best. Therefore, our rating is also not perfect. It is based on a combination of different parameters, which take into account both the opinions of betting business experts and the information about places of betting websites in the global Internet traffic by data Alexa.com. The last parameter is quite accurate and allows you to indirectly assess the popularity of bookmakers in the opinion of the players themselves. |
|
|
|
Rating Place
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3688
Merit: 1058
|
|
June 25, 2019, 06:37:39 PM |
|
Agree that Nitrogen is #1 and Betcoin #2. I'm not a big fan of 1xbit or Cloudbet but as you pointed out, all ratings guides will be somewhat different.
|
|
|
|
|
nakamura12
|
|
June 25, 2019, 06:54:13 PM |
|
Agree that Nitrogen is #1 and Betcoin #2. I'm not a big fan of 1xbit or Cloudbet but as you pointed out, all ratings guides will be somewhat different.
I guess you are not a big fan of 1xbit because of the accusation they got. My opinion is the same about the ratings of sportsbook as it all depends on every person if they decide that the sportsbook they choose is the best sportsbook while the other think that there is another sportsbook that they ever place bets. |
| | | | | | | ███▄▀██▄▄
░░▄████▄▀████ ▄▄▄
░░████▄▄▄▄░░█▀▀
███ ██████▄▄▀█▌
░▄░░███▀████
░▐█░░███░██▄▄
░░▄▀░████▄▄▄▀█
░█░▄███▀████ ▐█
▀▄▄███▀▄██▄
░░▄██▌░░██▀
░▐█▀████ ▀██
░░█▌██████ ▀▀██▄
░░▀███ | | ▄▄██▀▄███
▄▄▄████▀▄████▄░░
▀▀█░░▄▄▄▄████░░
▐█▀▄▄█████████
████▀███░░▄░
▄▄██░███░░█▌░
█▀▄▄▄████░▀▄░░
█▌████▀███▄░█░
▄██▄▀███▄▄▀
▀██░░▐██▄░░
██▀████▀█▌░
▄██▀▀██████▐█░░
███▀░░ | | | | |
|
|
|
|
carlfebz2
|
|
June 25, 2019, 07:49:45 PM |
|
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included? |
|
|
|
harizen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1398
For support ➡️ help.bc.game
|
|
June 25, 2019, 08:05:49 PM |
|
As far as the website stated:
"The TOP 100 Bookies comprehensive Ranking System is based on a combination of expert appraisal from the best in the betting business and in-depth web analytics from a number of reputable sources."
I just don't know what are these "REPUTABLE" sources since looks like they missed something or take everything in "general".
OP is clearly promoting the site. However, I see that their feature of providing advantages and disadvantages on a certain sportsbook might be a good reference to others.
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 25, 2019, 08:23:39 PM |
|
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included? BetKing will be soon removed from our rating, as they do not have a sportsbook on their site already. The problem is simply that it is not yet possible to replace it, as at the moment there are still not enough worthy bookmakers to complete the TOP 20 list. |
|
|
|
|
TimeTeller
|
|
June 25, 2019, 08:38:54 PM |
|
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included? BetKing will be soon removed from our rating, as they do not have a sportsbook on their site already. The problem is simply that it is not yet possible to replace it, as at the moment there are still not enough worthy bookmakers to complete the TOP 20 list. How did you finally come up with the rating A to C-? Is it based from the "reputable" sources that you mentioned on the site?
As far as the website stated:
"The TOP 100 Bookies comprehensive Ranking System is based on a combination of expert appraisal from the best in the betting business and in-depth web analytics from a number of reputable sources."
I just don't know what are these "REPUTABLE" sources since looks like they missed something or take everything in "general".
OP is clearly promoting the site. However, I see that their feature of providing advantages and disadvantages on a certain sportsbook might be a good reference to others.
Yes, I agree that the list of advantages as well as disadvantages is a good reference for some users here. Though NitrogenSports got the top spot from your list, yet, they are only accepting bitcoin at the moment. They should start accepting other popular altcoins though. |
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 25, 2019, 09:15:49 PM |
|
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included? BetKing will be soon removed from our rating, as they do not have a sportsbook on their site already. The problem is simply that it is not yet possible to replace it, as at the moment there are still not enough worthy bookmakers to complete the TOP 20 list. How did you finally come up with the rating A to C-? Is it based from the "reputable" sources that you mentioned on the site? First of all, we mean here the Alexa.com site, which gives accurate information about the places of the bookmaker websites in the global Internet traffic. Also, when compiling our rating, we took into account the data of other well-known sportsbook ratings, opinions of betting business experts and player reviews. In any case keep in mind that our rating is not ideal and not final, it will continue to evolve and improve. |
|
|
|
|
carlfebz2
|
|
June 25, 2019, 10:45:19 PM |
|
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included? BetKing will be soon removed from our rating, as they do not have a sportsbook on their site already. The problem is simply that it is not yet possible to replace it, as at the moment there are still not enough worthy bookmakers to complete the TOP 20 list. How did you finally come up with the rating A to C-? Is it based from the "reputable" sources that you mentioned on the site? First of all, we mean here the Alexa.com site, which gives accurate information about the places of the bookmaker websites in the global Internet traffic. Also, when compiling our rating, we took into account the data of other well-known sportsbook ratings, opinions of betting business experts and player reviews. In any case keep in mind that our rating is not ideal and not final, it will continue to evolve and improve. Good to know that you are clarifying anything is being asked out.People would normally react to things specially when they do saw the rankings isn't really suit out in their taste yet most people do have experience on using up any sportsbook and that's why rankings is much more better to be done with a Poll which community would able to choose up. Take a look into these threads: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5040737.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0 |
|
|
|
|
pakhitheboss
|
|
June 25, 2019, 11:26:33 PM |
|
Very good website you have. It is mobile friendly but, banner placement are looking awkward. I did read those detailed information about each website. I must say very nicely written. Good job.
What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.
It would be very easy for people like us to search on your website using the search bar, if you could actually put on the top of your sidebar. I found it a bit annoying at the end of the banner.
Also adding star rating based on user inputs will be a great idea. 🙂
|
|
|
|
|
FFrankie
|
|
June 26, 2019, 12:55:00 AM |
|
As the list goes down, I feel like you just threw sites on it because you didnt know any others. You should have a list of all the ones that did not make it on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haunebu
|
|
June 26, 2019, 07:17:14 AM |
|
What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.
He probably rated them based on their alexa ranking and individual reviews spread out here and there which seems legit since Nitrogen and Cloudbet are 2 of my favorite sportsbooks and they are on top of the rankings. As the list goes down, I feel like you just threw sites on it because you didnt know any others. You should have a list of all the ones that did not make it on.
I doubt it. He clearly seems to have done his research. I don't see any big players missing here. Which ones are you talking about? Nitrogen, Cloudbet, Onehash, Sportsbet etc are all there. |
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 26, 2019, 10:10:55 AM |
|
Very good website you have. It is mobile friendly but, banner placement are looking awkward. I did read those detailed information about each website. I must say very nicely written. Good job.
What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.
It would be very easy for people like us to search on your website using the search bar, if you could actually put on the top of your sidebar. I found it a bit annoying at the end of the banner.
Also adding star rating based on user inputs will be a great idea. 🙂
Thank you for your comments, we will try to take this into account to improve the site. However, we do not always have the opportunity to change all the marked elements at the request of users. Also on our site there is a rating by the voices of the players, but there are in general all known bookmakers (including Fiat), and not just cryptocurrency sportsbooks: http://100bookies.com/interactive-poll-where-do-you-bet/ |
|
|
|
webtricks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1728
|
|
June 26, 2019, 10:42:55 AM |
|
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!
|
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 26, 2019, 11:29:02 AM |
|
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!
Thanks for your comment! We will try to revise it in the future. The fact is that many of the reviews on our site have not been updated for several years, so most likely they are a bit outdated. On our site more than 400 sportsbooks are represented in general, so often we simply do not have time to follow the changes in the work of individual bookmakers. |
|
|
|
DarkDays
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1189
|
|
June 26, 2019, 10:15:31 PM |
|
Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.
Also, your website design is absolutely disgusting, how can we trust your reviews are credible when you can't even see that your website looks like it was made by an amateur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship11
|
|
June 26, 2019, 11:29:14 PM |
|
Thanks for your comment! We will try to revise it in the future. The fact is that many of the reviews on our site have not been updated for several years, so most likely they are a bit outdated. On our site more than 400 sportsbooks are represented in general, so often we simply do not have time to follow the changes in the work of individual bookmakers. You may want to consider updating your reviews before starting a thread with outdated ratings. Some of the sportsbooks you rate are not in business anymore. |
|
|
|
|
sportbettor (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
|
|
June 27, 2019, 05:01:58 AM |
|
Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.
We have a fairly simple and clear approach to the evaluation of new sportsbooks. So, for all new bookmakers, we initially assign a rating of "C-". However, if a well-known and trusted brand is behind the recently opened bookmaker, then in this case we can assign it a rating "C" immediately. This is what happened on our website as a result with FortuneJack. (!) I want to remind that we present the rating of bookmakers, and not a casinos. Therefore, in this case, an estimate was given only to the sportsbook section of FortuneJack, and not to the whole site as a whole. FortuneJack Sportsbook was opened just a few months ago, so it cannot yet have a rating higher than "C-". And just for the well-known name of its brand, it was immediately rated half a point higher. In any case, this assessment is not final and may be revised over time. Bitcoin Rush we know for a long time, so it is rated higher. |
|
|
|
|
