Beware - Resurgence of previously inactive projects

[Ucy]

They are probably fake if truly they ignored your inquiries during that period. The last bear market was really an interesting way of identifying the fake and real projects. Guess everyone has learned their lessons with all the ignores from the projects.

[fullhdpixel]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

I don’t think that would be the right choice for the crypto community. Especially those who already have their investment stock in it, if they get the hype now and their value picks up, those investors would be able to quickly pull out their fund before it gets dump finally and become a shitcoins.

This is not so much surprising to me, I can see that altcoins season is very much approaching, during the altcoins season is when you see developers of deadcoin also rising to quickly push their products to the public through several means of promotion, and I think they even use more off airdrop then, which is why we sometimes see some dead coins suddenly rise to its peak during alt season. There are so many altcoins that I have in my portfolio now that looks dead , and I will support them in anyway if it will make me get my money back.

[bitsurfer2014]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

I also noticed that these projects have started to actively work after crypto winter. But alas, only those participants who know about these projects will bypass them. You can make a blacklist, but only a few will see it.

I guess you have a point but its a little bit tricky if I will include them in a blacklist without much evidence and just a hint alone. First I want the crypto-community to have a sense of awareness on this occurrences and subsequently maybe those who have in invested directly on those a projects would stand and could make a scam accusations based on their evidences so that we can hear their sides more clearly about this matter.

[meleonk]

I also began to notice that many projects began their activity again. And the most interesting thing they started to do slyly. Many simply changed the names of their projects under the guise of what they did rebranding. They kept their telegram chats, accounts in social networks, etc.

[Delilonia1]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

I totally agree with you. Why will they be quiet for so long only to resurrect now that the crypto market is looking green? Let's be guided. In my opinion, I think these people dont really care about their investors, leaving them clueless about what exactly is going on. That's totally unfair. If they are active again, it's not a good sign

[rdewilde]

Funny as it is, but that's totally true and their intention is clear they are out to scam more people, but they will fail. Imagine a project going cold and all of a sudden rising? No one will take it serious as they have learnt their lessons.
Nevertheless, we should be careful because they will come with good Incentives to draw people, let's always endeavour to research and safeguard your funds.

[bitsurfer2014]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

I doubt that this is a red flag. Actually most of the projects conducting ICOs have been inactive for a year now just because of the market situation. Look for other criteria to evaluate project correctly.

I beg to disagree, any project that leaves its community alone without any update or news is very unethical and unusual. I suppose most of these projects don't give importance to their community especially since most of them don't have any product development or roadmap updates and nothing to show off to the community other than their broken promises. Conversely, the crypto winter is a shallow alibi for them not to get in touch with their own communities since some projects also managed to give updates and constant interactions with its people and continued its product development regardless of it.

[b3llsf1l3s]

most projects are doing their very last pump before their complete exit where the token dies for good and never seen again. that is natural course of this market specially when it is filled with thousands of useless projects that were created only to get pumped and dumped for a shirt time.

Usually, but however in a market that is truly unstable like this for now it is very rare. Last year I also often took part in a really good project, the Russian Project if I was not mistaken, and entered into the Yobit exchange, unfortunately their coins could not be listed in Coinmarketcap, where is it now unknown. I also did not see any news of the last Pump for the coin.

[Rengga Jati]

I'm ever in this place and situation where the inactive projects are coming.
Well, actually, as an investor, we must always update the chance of the new projects whether they are developing or progressing or not.
But with the resurgence, what will happen actually? I'm still confused about this kind of situation.

[kawetsriyanto]

I ever find out several projects that are considered as a dead project, but then, its resurgence is rising and surprised most investor or token holders. Actually, this may happen, but so rare. However, in fact, a legit project will always offer long-term investment worth. It means that sometimes, we need more than 2 years in order to allow the projects to grow on the market. We cannot force the projects to grow in a quick time.
When the resurgence of the inactive projects are coming, it really signs that the project may be legit enough, with certain real products and we must watch out and analyze more about the projects.

[nanaimogold]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

I noticed this scenario some weeks back. Old and failed cryptocurrency projects juggling up in the wake of bitcoin moon to see if the can cash out on unsuspecting members of the cryptocurrency community. Everyone should beware

[moonblocks]

If a project has acquired a new development team who's active and have a good reputation then it can be worthwhile investing in, but if it's just being pumped and dumped without anyone contributing to its development and community then it's unlikely to be a viable long term investment

[maldini]

I ever find out several projects that are considered as a dead project, but then, its resurgence is rising and surprised most investor or token holders. Actually, this may happen, but so rare. However, in fact, a legit project will always offer long-term investment worth. It means that sometimes, we need more than 2 years in order to allow the projects to grow on the market. We cannot force the projects to grow in a quick time.
When the resurgence of the inactive projects are coming, it really signs that the project may be legit enough, with certain real products and we must watch out and analyze more about the projects.

yup right, I also experienced this, the project that I thought died then gave me an epic comeback, at that time I was sorry. But I also realized that my decision was also right because not all projects had the same fate, maybe there were only 1: 100 projects like that.

Now I'm monitoring a new MB8Coin project, where this project is the top choice project according to coinschedule last year. And now it looks like a dead project, but I'm sure this will surprise you later.

[Argoo]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

Yes, I have already seen several resumed fundraising projects of ICO, which have already conducted their own ICOs. If they simply did not raise enough funds for their project or suspend it, then I don’t see anything wrong here. Even good projects during the bear market could not collect even the minimum amount.
However, I was recently surprised when I saw that the Taklimakan campaign, which last year conducted the ICO and issued its TKLN tokens, and which I received for signing up for the campaign, signed the ICO, again began to raise funds. It is really necessary to beware.

[Neovitadi]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

Yes, I have already seen several resumed fundraising projects of ICO, which have already conducted their own ICOs. If they simply did not raise enough funds for their project or suspend it, then I don’t see anything wrong here. Even good projects during the bear market could not collect even the minimum amount.
However, I was recently surprised when I saw that the Taklimakan campaign, which last year conducted the ICO and issued its TKLN tokens, and which I received for signing up for the campaign, signed the ICO, again began to raise funds. It is really necessary to beware.

Well, with every investment that you do online you should use caution before investing in it. The idea of the project resuming shows that the developers could be interested in building their project.

[yongonepangl1]

There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.

IEO trend is in vogue, they will return and IEO on a good exchange

[michellee]

If a project has acquired a new development team who's active and have a good reputation then it can be worthwhile investing in, but if it's just being pumped and dumped without anyone contributing to its development and community then it's unlikely to be a viable long term investment

I guess that will not be easy to convince the previous investor or community to join in the project because I think they are getting a bad experience from the previous team or developer. And maybe that will be a hard job for the new development teams to convince the new people to join in their project. They need to promote in many places as they need to build a new community to help them to reach the new goals.

[jacafbiz]

When one sees events like this repeating itself again then the bull market is confirmed, just wait for some months and we will start reading about projects scamming people and disappear, this is a good news for those bag-holding the coins because it would give them hope of the price going up

[fudster]

Seen some projects doing ICO last year which were assumed scam by its bounty hunters but now are slowing getting alive in their telegram channel.  The Swipecrypto project for instance, didn't pay their bounty hunters but stopped their presence in their channel but this time there appears a new admin and then seem they are going to continue the project.

[bitsurfer2014]

Seen some projects doing ICO last year which were assumed scam by its bounty hunters but now are slowing getting alive in their telegram channel.  The Swipecrypto project for instance, didn't pay their bounty hunters but stopped their presence in their channel but this time there appears a new admin and then seem they are going to continue the project.

I smell something fishy with those projects but in fairness with them yet though I'm a little bit skeptical, I was thinking that unless they can show product updates or better yet release a final product then my resolve is to take caution on this projects consequently.