Changing the rules in the End of the Bounty Campaign is a form of Abuse

[creeps]

Trusted bounty manager helps there before promoting start. Once I didn't get my bounty reward because changed rules KYC is mandatory by proof of residency.

Managers are also following the rules of the developed, and they can change it as stated on the OP. Before you participate make sure that you know the rules and you are ready for some changes that may occur. Sometimes this is abuse because they change the rules against the hunters, meaning they ask too much and they changed too much, in this case you can’t do anything but to wait for the result of that.

[1715157729]

1715157729

[1715157729]

1715157729

[firmino10]

Changing the rules at the end of the bounty campaign is betrayal and shows that the bounty managers and the project do not have integrity. Because the rules are the agreement the hunters agreed to before performing the tasks so why change the rules when they have fulfilled their own part if the contract.

[Menawi12]

Changing the rules at the end of the bounty campaign is betrayal and shows that the bounty managers and the project do not have integrity. Because the rules are the agreement the hunters agreed to before performing the tasks so why change the rules when they have fulfilled their own part if the contract.

Sometimes this happens a lot in many campaigns. Usually the changes that often occur are the KYC requirements and many bounty hunters who are afraid that their data or documents will be misused. But the bounty manager should be able to communicate this to the developer team from the start of the campaign

[qomariah95]

Cut the allocation when the campaign ends. Is that can be called abuse. Because this happened to me when all the campaigns were finished and suddenly there was an announcement regarding the allocation which was cut without cause and effect for reasons that in my opinion did not make sense.

[asder250]

I do not think so.
They can change rules because they have written in the rules, that rules can be changed.  You will not see any red tagged bounty manager for this, maybe for not paying bounty hunters or promoting a scam. 

[iyah adrian]

Cut the allocation when the campaign ends. Is that can be called abuse. Because this happened to me when all the campaigns were finished and suddenly there was an announcement regarding the allocation which was cut without cause and effect for reasons that in my opinion did not make sense.

Something like this can be said of abuse. Because usually in regulations it is not said allocation can change. The project should have thought about this, why would something like this happen. Because being chosen by the first person is the initial allocation.

[zzortyx]

Of course changing the rules during the campaign or at its end is bad. Therefore, at the very beginning, the project can prescribe the possibility of changing the rules. Although in most cases this does not affect the end result. If they want to reduce payments, extend the campaign, etc., they will do so.

[ub27]

It's a form of sheer wickedness and way to frustrate the bounty hunters, they always use that phrase "that rules are liable to changed anytine" as an excuse.  But the most annoying of it all is when they change allocation also

[Redemption59]

I do understand the much concern about changing of rule at the end of bounty campaign by either project or bounty managers. This is real time form of abuse but one thing I have noticed is that, most bounty managers indicates that the bounty rules are subject to change so if you consider the change can affect you if you don't have certain documents, please ignore and look for a new one and thi because more abuse sake hunters don't like reading.

[Chomsy]

This has become the order of the day for most bounties yet they crucify hunters that do not adhere to rules. If these projects on bounty campaihms can stick to their own rules to the later, bounty will be a lot more fun.

[Redemption59]

Changing the rules at the end of a bounty campaign can really be frustrating and unfair as some even consider it to be a form of an abuse but what are we all missing here?, Most bounty managers always indicates at the end of their bounty rules that their bounty rules are subject to change and if it does happens, what is the course of alarm? Is high time bounty hunter read bounty rules and stop considering change of rules at the end of a bounty campaign as an abuse.

[fumblingperch]

Many bounty managers who were in 2017-2018 years is not working. Now there are a lot of newcomers. Of course, injustice is very common, but bounty managers write in terms of bounty that the rules can be changed at any time. Also, sometimes the project team itself can change the conditions of the bounty, and in this case the BM has nothing to do with it.

[Mulann2]

Absolutely a form of abuse on the part of the team as well as the bm, because some bm don't  fight on behalf of the bounty hunters, rather they only fight themselves only, allow the team to treat hunters like they don't matter, all this last minute change of rules is definitely an indirect abuse of bouty hunters effort to promote  that project.

[martina14]

There were so many bounties before in 2018 which is really scam!
We are looking forward for a better bounties this year.
Changing rules is legal as it is stated on the thread, though if KYC will be a mandatory it should be declare on the first day of the bounty campaign.

[Kwansimaa]

The truth is, changing rules at the end of bounty campaign is really a form of abuse of which I second to. Not even along the or within the period of the campaign but rather at the end is really a great form of abuse of which project and bounty managers should step away from. Even though bounty rules may be subject to change but doing so after hunters are done working is a form of abuse and cheat.

[danggoron]

Natural selection applies here: D bounty managers who are indicated to commit fraud, unfair, and other negative actions will surely get harsh warnings and negtrust punishment from moderators. Bounty hunter will also not want to join the bounty project he is handling. I also don't like to join bounty managers who are not professional in carrying out their duties.
For rules that change at the end of the campaign period, it is the rights and authority of the developer and the bounty manager team. Either the allocation is cut, the period is extended, doing KYC, etc. That's part of the risk, if you agree, then do it, if not, leave it.

[tondenga2122]

Yes, It sometimes happens to me. The manager instantly changes the allocation of bounty in the day of distribution.
The rules are already written that the allocation is fixed, but yeah... The lied in the end

[Argoo]

The change in the terms of payment of remuneration to bounty hunters is primarily to blame for the ICO team. Now it has come to the point that rarely a team does not deceive bounty hunters. A recent example of this is the Mirakle Tele project. The team has long paid passive income in its website. However, after some time they unilaterally announced that they were reducing payments and that the previously paid amounts on this site would be recounted downwards. This means a decrease of about five times. It turns out that who managed to withdraw this income, he won, and who believed this project, to a large extent lost their money. The team could reduce the amount of paid passive income, however, to select the amounts already calculated - this is a direct and undisguised fraud.

[Ezio_Auditore]

The most common deception is the introduction of the KYC procedure at the end of a company's bounty. I try to avoid the company where this procedure is required. I do not wish to give my personal data to anyone. Bounty and managers who lead these companies should definitely get negative trust on this forum.

[Viscore]

Bounty manager has nothing to do with it actually. Because they wrote in the thread that anytime team can change the rules or allocation so join with caution! Some projects are treating badly with the bounty hunters! So, bounty managers are not to blame in this case I think. And one thing you have to remind that we passed away those glory bounty days in 2016-2017! Just Forget them, bounty hunting won't be the same as those years! 

Bounties nowadays are so much different compared to those previous years. The budget allocated for it is so much small already and the fact that some bounty hunters are still changing the rules including the share allocations at the end of the campaign which resulted into uneven shares and some are not really rewarded. Although we cannot the blame the bounty manager itself but to be fair to the bounty hunters, they should be given fair shares to paid off all of their efforts.