Gamblingtec Signature Campaign | Get BTC or your own casino brand [CLOSED]

[julerz12]

It is always good to use a trusted escrow if the campaign is posting by a newbie user but if they do not escrow then no one can force them either. The participants will join the signature campaign with their own risk.

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

Just so we know you are on the same page as everyone else here, you're talking about this user: game-protect?
It seems you missed a few reasons why most people here find it hard to trust that guy.
See this for reference

I would suggest hiring a trusted escrow for this signature campaign or else you'll have a hard time earning trust within this forum.
You can pick anyone on this list here.

[1714815455]

1714815455

[1714815455]

1714815455

[1714815455]

1714815455

[BlackFor3st]

Btctalk name : BlackFor3st
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841;sa=summary
Rank : Hero Member
Current post count : 961
Wear appropriate signature : Yes

[LUCKMCFLY]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name: LUCKMCFLY
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153977
Rank: Full Member
Current post count:3219
Wear appropriate signature: Yes

[Darker45]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name: Darker45
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=901661
Rank: Hero Member
Current post count: 910
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
BTC Address: 1LSA37v6FMRRphN3cA2RAKYagGZPzpTxyK

[babysweetTiger0401]

PAYMENT OPTION 1)
Btctalk name : babysweetTiger0401
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=992987;sa=summary
Rank : Sr.member
Current post count : 647
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar : Yes
BTC address : bc1qs6w9qcm2nq9umxdanxyl3hcnvl2yadmru55l47

[spadormie]

2. Escrow service - Game Protect will do the Escrow, username "game-protect".

WAIT? REALLY? Game-protect is the escrow in this campaign? Well, I bid you good luck.

[smyslov]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name                               smyslov                                     
Link to profile                              https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=924304           
Rank                                             smyslov             
Current post count                       1485
Wear appropriate signature           Ready to wear once accepted

[angel55]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name                angel55                                  
Link to profile               https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1192695;sa=summary          
Rank                            full member      
Current post count         1151
Wear appropriate signature            once accepted

[Scheede]

Nice one, unfortunatelly ran out of Merits

It is always good to use a trusted escrow if the campaign is posting by a newbie user but if they do not escrow then no one can force them either. The participants will join the signature campaign with their own risk.

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

Just so we know you are on the same page as everyone else here, you're talking about this user: game-protect?
It seems you missed a few reasons why most people here find it hard to trust that guy.
See this for reference

I would suggest hiring a trusted escrow for this signature campaign or else you'll have a hard time earning trust within this forum.
You can pick anyone on this list here.

For that reason I am staying away from applying as of now.
Will follow the thread though to see if things change in future.

[Quickseller]

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

Is this an out of season April fools joke?

(reference)

I suspect that participants are not going to get paid. The OP could be closely associated with game-protect or is making the claim that he is acting as escrow without his knowledge, but in either case, I do not have confidence that anyone will receive payment.

From the looks of it, this is not going to stop many people for advertising this business.

[chateaux]

Nice one, unfortunatelly ran out of Merits

It is always good to use a trusted escrow if the campaign is posting by a newbie user but if they do not escrow then no one can force them either. The participants will join the signature campaign with their own risk.

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

Just so we know you are on the same page as everyone else here, you're talking about this user: game-protect?
It seems you missed a few reasons why most people here find it hard to trust that guy.
See this for reference

I would suggest hiring a trusted escrow for this signature campaign or else you'll have a hard time earning trust within this forum.
You can pick anyone on this list here.

For that reason I am staying away from applying as of now.
Will follow the thread though to see if things change in future.

Love it - what software did you use to create the meme?

[jake zyrus]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name : jake zyrus
Link to profile:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1053839
Rank: Full Member
Current post count : 738 + 1
Wear appropriate signature: To be follow once I get accepted

[pieppiep]

Payment option 1)
Btctalk name : pieppiep
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366
Rank : Hero Member
Current post count : 1215
Wear appropriate signature : Yes

[BitcoinTurk]

Payment Option: 1
Btctalk Name: BitcoinTurk
Link to Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=511692
Rank: Sr. Member
Current Post Count: 3.125 (Including this.)
Wear Appropriate Signature: YES

[aioc]

I notice manager did not put the number of participants that he wants to enroll here, I don't want to connect it to other campaign but the only two campaigns that does not limit their participants are Yobit and Stake.com, I bet they will soon have a lot of applicants here when the early birds successfully cash out.

[bitcoinisbest]

Payment option : 1
Btctalk name : bitcoinisbest
Link to profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893749
Rank : Hero Member
Current post count : 3075
Wear appropriate signature : Yes

[spadormie]

Love it - what software did you use to create the meme?

Don't love that meme. It was an indirect assault to you.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

It is always good to use a trusted escrow if the campaign is posting by a newbie user but if they do not escrow then no one can force them either. The participants will join the signature campaign with their own risk.

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

The whole idea to have an escrow is that you do not want the community to ask question about the fund for the campaign. You want the community feel safe that whoever will participate in your campaign, they will get paid. But you have picked someone as your escrow who has tons of negative feedback (trusted) from users which will create a lot of drama in the community (from the posts above I see the drama has already in play).

I never had a chat or never used any service from game protect so I personally have no stance for him/them but having a lot of negative feedback does not look good under a profile.

Here is a fee suggestion for you: You do not need to use an escrow if you really want to go with game protect. It will be a waste for the fees you will pay him/them.

If you are really serious about escrow then use someone who has existing escrow service in the forum and well trusted with the money. For example: Use DarkStar_. He has the lowest fees (I think) and he is one of the multiSig wallet key holder of the 500BTC the forum has.

[chateaux]

It is always good to use a trusted escrow if the campaign is posting by a newbie user but if they do not escrow then no one can force them either. The participants will join the signature campaign with their own risk.

An escrow is def good, thats why we have chosen game-protect, the name says its all "game" and "protect", everyone wins.

The whole idea to have an escrow is that you do not want the community to ask a question about the fund for the campaign. You want the community feel safe that whoever will participate in your campaign, they will get paid. But you have picked someone as your escrow who has tons of negative feedback (trusted) from users which will create a lot of drama in the community (from the posts above I see the drama has already in play).

I never had a chat or never used any service from game protect so I personally have no stance for him/them but having a lot of negative feedback does not look good under a profile.

Here is a fee suggestion for you: You do not need to use an escrow if you really want to go with game protect. It will be a waste for the fees you will pay him/them.

If you are really serious about escrow then use someone who has existing escrow service in the forum and well trusted with the money. For example: Use DarkStar_. He has the lowest fees (I think) and he is one of the multiSig wallet key holder of the 500BTC the forum has.

I do not disagree with the use of escrow as it installs trust. Unfortunately, this is not as cut and dry as one may think.

If DarkStar (or any other) is willing to sign a contract, and hand over KYC i.e. two forms of ID, proof of address (utility bill no older than 3 months or equivalent [and for each director of the comapny]) and have on hand a valid tax return for the past financial year (personally or for their company), we can work with them. Otherwise, we can not risk working with individuals who wish to remain anonymous and at the same time handle our funds. If for any reason the individual or company we use is in any way linked to drug money, fraud, money laundering, etc. we stand to lose more than a few bucks thrown at a marketing campaign.

I trust this is clear. If you do not agree, then we will simply not work with you.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I do not disagree with the use of escrow as it installs trust. Unfortunately, this is not as cut and dry as one may think.

If DarkStar (or any other) is willing to sign a contract, and hand over KYC i.e. two forms of ID, proof of address (utility bill no older than 3 months or equivalent [and for each director of the comapny]) and have on hand a valid tax return for the past financial year (personally or for their company), we can work with them. Otherwise, we can not risk working with individuals who wish to remain anonymous and at the same time handle our funds. If for any reason the individual or company we use is in any way linked to drug money, fraud, money laundering, etc. we stand to lose more than a few bucks thrown at a marketing campaign.

You are the ultimate decision maker for your business but the things you are asking from an escrow here, it does not work like this in this community. This is a crypto currency community. We are very sensitive with our privacy. Our trust is in cryptographic proofs and blockchain which is publicly accessible, nothing hidden there.

I surely can not speak for DarkStar_ or any other escrow in this forum but I believe the following will be true for all of them:

If you ask them to handover their ID and stuffs to you then you will hear a "no" however if you ask them to sign a Bitcoin address which they have staked here which proves it's really them and their history in this community then I am sure they will be more than happy to offer you their service. You need to accept the culture of a community if you want to business with them.

Talking about drags and money laundering and all these stuffs, I am not sure how it's relevant with your service. You need someone who will hold your fund for you and will use the fund as per your given terms.

I trust this is clear. If you do not agree, then we will simply not work with you.

Of course your message is clear but your expectation is unrealistic. You are trying to step-in in a community without respecting their culture.