Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System

[TECSHARE]

Account sale thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4309586.0

Trust system abuse over criticism in Politics & Society:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=15728

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48119.msg51721644#msg51721644

[1714812124]

1714812124

[1714812124]

1714812124

[1714812124]

1714812124

[1714812124]

1714812124

[1714812124]

1714812124

[1714812124]

1714812124

[suchmoon]

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system?

[Quickseller]

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system?

The rating that TECSHARE left says:

Sold account. Most likely an alt of a more well known member. Abusing trust system.

I see a number of people on your trust list who have left trust for very similar reasons, in masse.

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

[suchmoon]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

[TECSHARE]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

Normally I would just delete it because this is just another pathetic attempt at retribution for calling out you and your brown nose clan, but I think I am going to leave it up because it is a great example of your hypocritical double standards and desperate compulsion to punish anyone who is critical of you and yours. You keep flailing, it is a good look for you.

[xolxol]

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system?

do you mean your group's solution?pathetic douche twat.

[Quickseller]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

[suchmoon]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

[TECSHARE]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

So what is your argument, that you don't support tagging account sellers on a regular basis? "whataboutism" in this case can also be described as hypocrisy.

[suchmoon]

So what is your argument, that you don't support tagging account sellers on a regular basis? "whataboutism" in this case can also be described as hypocrisy.

Do you tag account sellers on a regular basis and with proper proof? Or do you just dig something up in retaliation when someone disagrees with out in P&S, like e.g. with nutildah and now koshgel?

To be fair, for all I know koshgel is a sold account (proof would be nice tho) but it's quite clear to me that your red tag is retaliatory and your judgement can't be trusted.

Normally I would just delete it because this is just another pathetic attempt at retribution for calling out you and your brown nose clan, but I think I am going to leave it up because it is a great example of your hypocritical double standards and desperate compulsion to punish anyone who is critical of you and yours. You keep flailing, it is a good look for you.

I'm totally not sorry that my pointing out of your petty retaliatory use of the trust system seems like punishment to you. If the shoe fits...

[Quickseller]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

So in other words, your argument boils down to:
"Rules for thee but not for me"

The proof Koshgel is sold is in the OP. The OP is unedited, so it was there when you first posted.

[TECSHARE]

I'm totally not sorry that my pointing out of your petty retaliatory use of the trust system seems like punishment to you. If the shoe fits...

I don't tag anyone on a regular basis, because I don't think this forum needs wanna be internet mall cops. I also don't tag people for disagreeing with me. He left me a negative rating because he was upset with my disagreement with him, at which point I discovered his thread openly advertising his account for sale, then I tagged him for it, including a reference from his own mouth. I never would have bothered looking if he had not abused the trust system to begin with, however that is not the same as tagging him for disagreeing with me. Your endless act of "accuse your opponents of the crimes you yourself are guilty of" never ceases to be entertaining Suchbaboon. Keep it up.

[suchmoon]

So in other words

Uhm... nope.

If you insist on whataboutism and hypocrisy then we shall also look at your (and TECSHARE's) opposition to tagging for account sales, except when it suits you (or him). I don't know many other users who would resort to doxing and trust system abuse due to disagreements in P&S so you two dipshits really stand out from the crowd here.

[TECSHARE]

So in other words

Uhm... nope.

If you insist on whataboutism and hypocrisy then we shall also look at your (and TECSHARE's) opposition to tagging for account sales, except when it suits you (or him). I don't know many other users who would resort to doxing and trust system abuse due to disagreements in P&S so you two dipshits really stand out from the crowd here.

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

Doxing now huh? The list of horse shit grows by the minute. Are you sure you aren't a horse instead of a baboon?

[suchmoon]

Doxing now huh?

That's Quicksy's MO. If you weren't busy making shit up you would have noticed that the post you're replying to was addressed to him.

[TECSHARE]

Doxing now huh?

That's Quicksy's MO. If you weren't busy making shit up you would have noticed that the post you're replying to was addressed to him.

Oh, I see, it was my fault you were off topic and conflating his actions with mine. My mistake.

[nutildah]

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

The point is you don't give a shit about account sales unless if you can use it as a weapon against somebody who you feel slighted you. You dredged up a 3 year old incident 15 minutes after I caused you some sort of grief on P&S, and then you expect people to believe the two events are unrelated. You obviously wouldn't give a shit about this person's account sales if they hadn't red trusted you.

I've received plenty of unjust red feedbacks but I don't feel the need to investigate each account and post about it in Reputation, nor do I feel the need to leave them a retaliatory feedback.

[TECSHARE]

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

The point is you don't give a shit about account sales unless if you can use it as a weapon against somebody who you feel slighted you. You dredged up a 3 year old incident 15 minutes after I caused you some sort of grief on P&S, and then you expect people to believe the two events are unrelated. You obviously wouldn't give a shit about this person's account sales if they hadn't red trusted you.

I've received plenty of unjust red feedbacks but I don't feel the need to investigate each account and post about it in Reputation, nor do I feel the need to leave them a retaliatory feedback.

I don't like account sales, but I also don't think it is my business to police the forum for things I don't like or are not against the rules. So because I don't run around acting like a wanna be mall cop I don't get to use the trust system to engage with people who directly engage with me? Nice logic nutilduhhh.

This person decided that the trust system is a tool to punish people for disagreeing with them. Why should I give them a courtesy they don't give me? I didn't go looking for him, he found me. You are the last person who should be commenting on this. Furthermore, if this was something I did exclusively for retaliation you would have been flagged a long time ago hypocrite. Thanks for proving my point salty boy.

[eddie13]

I thought the koshgel account was wrecked a long time ago 

[nutildah]

This person decided that the trust system is a tool to punish people for disagreeing with them. Why should I give them a courtesy they don't give me? I didn't go looking for him, he found me. You are the last person who should be commenting on this. Furthermore, if this was something I did exclusively for retaliation you would have been flagged a long time ago hypocrite. Thanks for proving my point salty boy.

Because you shouldn't let it bother you, but you let everything bother you. You missed my point entirely about retaliatory feedback. This is why you are unfit for DT.

You did try to get me tagged already and you failed spectacularly. What happened instead was you were kicked off DT1 again and racked up even more exclusions thereafter. Now its your turn to cry about this being a "politburo" system, and that's why nobody likes you. Historically speaking this is your next go-to trick that you pull out of your bag of about 2 or 3 tricks.