Do you think advisors help new projects?

[masterusd]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

[fapar]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

And what do you see in the relationship of advisors and the success of ICO (or fraud)? Advisor is a specialist in a particular area, which is accessed if necessary. It is needed to make the right decision and to succeed ICO. For example, you have decided to conduct an ICO for a project related to brewing or mining. For your part, you provide the idea (even just create a website and whitepapers and find people who will work for you), and the advisor already checks the implementation of your idea in a certain area in which he is an expert.

[Doranile432]

Good advisors has impact in a projects life ,sometimes most teams are good technically in software and hardware aspect but a project teams might lack marketing strategy, good advisors always have good experience about what moves to take in a bad market

[masterusd]

Good advisors has impact in a projects life ,sometimes most teams are good technically in software and hardware aspect but a project teams might lack marketing strategy, good advisors always have good experience about what moves to take in a bad market

So you think advisors good only in marketing.

[tycsols]

It depends on the role of the advisors, in serious companies they do take the advise or suggestion of the advisor in the subject where he is an expert but when it cones to icos i think most of them list the advisors just for the sake of marketing and to lure people to invest because i have never read or heard the role of advisor after an ico.

[Herbert2020]

the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?

no because first of all those that create an ICO aren't looking for success of their project. there is no project really. their only goal is to make a lot of money quickly by raising it from people who are buying a virtual number on their computers that has no other value other than on exchanges where they dump.
secondly because we don't have any advisors in this space. we only have newbies and experts. experts don't waste their time on ICO projects with that goal and newbies who do, are doing it to scam others.

[bluesnup]

Advisors are just a name to legitimize a project

[Delilonia1]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

Since every project has a team of advisors, it wont be bad if their attention is called to issues that requires better understanding from. It is true that there are so many experts on cryptocurrency but in my opinion, I think there is no end to learning.  We learn everyday unless we choose not to

[jrrsparkles]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

You even mentioned that lot of projects succeed without advisors and lot of them turned into scams with them so they are nit take place much on the success of the projects so you don't have to decide the quality of the project based on their availability.

[VanDeinsberg12]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

Advisor has no impact to the project itself and it's only give a small increase on its popularity but not for a platform which already created a partnership with the advisor to create a new protocol.
Casper lab has so many advisors and the team is also working with the advisor at the same team and that's the different case

[Tipstar]

Advisers are of two types.
One that advises about technical aspects of project, design, marketing, blockchain, smart contracts, economics etc. There types of advisers are useful for project especially when the team lacks expert of respective fields.
Another type of advisers are those who just gives advertisement and buzz on media. They do create some interest but are not worth the cost they come with.

[aioc]

It can help provided the advisor is a respected member of the community like Buterin, because no person of good standing will accept as an advisor if the project will not do well in the market, the advisor should have the technical knowledge and really is an expert in his field I have seen people employing advisors which we do not know or if the resume is real.

[Nadziratel]

The Advisor topic was something that guys like McAfee and R. Ver used to earn money and create hype for the project. But people realized early that this consultation wasn't that important. There is no importance anymore.

[kopijos]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

what is the policy of the advisory person. if indeed the advisor has the responsibility to be willing to help the project, maybe there won't be a scam coin and the coin will go according to the target.

[bettercrypto]

Yes f course! As a pro and sometimes, pioneer of this industry we can help new projects to succeed. A lot of investors are depending with advisors. What do I say? We invest sometimes because there are good advisors. So, probably in terms of exposure the new projects, advisors will help them to launch successfully. And if they help new projects they freely promote also your projects. In short, mutualism.

[kalstarzz]

yes. advisors will still have a role in finding or giving direction in advancing a particular project. because with the job advisor the project team will be well directed. besides that the advisor will also provide strategy advice. so for me the advisor is still needed in the success of the new project.

[MadeinCoin]

I followed a project trip since last year, and I think advisors cannot be a benchmark that projects that have the best advisers will be successful. Because I see for myself, there are still many projects without successful advisors. It all depends on how their team works, if their team is very good and experienced, I don't think advisor is needed here, but with the advisor there must be added value by the investors.

[spadormie]

New ICO projects rose because of advisors that already advised many projects from the past. Especially those advisors that are truly crypto enthusiasts. Just so you know, having a known personality in cryptocurrency could lead to the success of your project . Like hire Roger Ver as an example. And having a known personality advising the project will lead to many investors.

[restumaulana]

I think that is not enough to help, good projects must be audited and have permits that apply in every country, and adjust them to the regulations in force in the country, those conditions must be met

[Nalbo]

If a project is good enough. It would require no advisers. It's just the newbie projects or the fancy ones that requires advisers.
Most of the so called advisers shown on whitepaper of most ICOs are self proclaimed ICO experts. They just let their photo get published for a low fee.
While some are genuinely helping the project with their experience.