Bounty Campaign After Getting Listed

[Andrews193]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

in my opinion, it is not important for a project that has been completed. ICO / IEO has carried out a bounty campaign ... because in my opinion this is very wasteful of time and coins that will be given to bounty participants and also airdrop ... they better focus on certain products to be able developed in other ways and spent their money there ..

I don't think so, I think this is also a good method for the completed project to receive many new investors because this market is receiving trust over time, a lot of people from not knowing crypto have started to be aware of it, and this is a good opportunity for projects that have completed advertising their technologies and products. Especially when using the bounty campaign, it is also a strategy of the completed projects, they want to stimulate the interest of the old investors, helping their coins become more bustling

[capcaypro]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

marketing is a very important matter that is very important, it is done so that someone gives feedback to them and also so that there are new investors and trader who are interested in trading  and also that is a good thing.

you're right, bounty after the project is running is actually a way to keep their community stable. with such trade will continue to grow, and project can also get new investors who can pump for their coins.

If both run smoothly, in the future it will be good for the community by inviting investors to join, it is better for the project to run early. and for bounties it can be ended.

[mbluxs]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

marketing is a very important matter that is very important, it is done so that someone gives feedback to them and also so that there are new investors and trader who are interested in trading  and also that is a good thing.

I agree with you, indeed marketing is very important for a campaign. because marketing is one of the things that will support a progress on a project. so indeed, basically a project must do marketing so that the project can be known by many people from all walks of life.

[Raidal]

I think coins or tokens that are on the exchange still have to do a bounty campaign if they really want the sale of their coins to move rapidly and quickly. With the movement of their coins which is quite rapid, there are also more investors coming. This bounty campaign is also carried out to facilitate a coin or token to reach the hardcap so that all the programs are achieved properly. That's a bit of my opinion.

[spydee1522]

I think this is a good decision by project managers to run bounty campaigns even after being listed because it gives the coin the chance to increase in volume and also to create much awareness of the coin and this can truly help with the value of the coin leading to the progress of the coin.

[old fart]

I think it is just a way of building the project community and creating awareness. With bounty campaign, projects can reach out to people and create a positive sentiments.

[masterusd]

I think there is no any issue for that, bounty is a kind of advertising, and if bounty come after coins listing in exchange it will be clear for us to judge if the project behind it good or no.

[Saisher]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

Definitely, that's a good idea and all tokens should still continue to do promotion, there are a lot of investors looking for a new and old  token to promote, and they are going to get the awareness if they launch a new campaign for their token.

[Xalata]

Bounties at conducted to advertise about a project so it can attract more investors. I don't see the reason why a project already listed cannot organize bounties. Whether a project is listed or not, that shouldn't change the purpose of bounties.

[Torps1]

Yes, bounty campaign is not meant to create awareness about a project only at the initial/ICO stage but also after ICO or token sales has been been completed. I think campaign being carried out after tokensale is aimed at promoting the project' product to users and not necessarily investors. Such intention is aimed at more/mass adoption of project products

[ityandsyn]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

      Yes I really believed on on this because it's a sort advertising the project especially if it's not known yet to the public so maybe this a new style of processing until it will succeed since I also noticed in one of my signature campaign  .

[Cryptotissue]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

Bounty campaign is basically a form of advert or promotion of crypto projects, products or platforms.  There is nothing wrong if an already listed coin decides to run a bounty campaign.  This is just a means to promote their product or coin and also increase the number of users that patronize their product or platform.

[Dalmar]

Bounty campaign is great option for promoting the project and get something at the end due to completed online responsibilities. After getting listed the project expects dump on the prices due to the greediness of the bounty hunters and investors.

[Mahanton]

Bounty campaign is great option for promoting the project and get something at the end due to completed online responsibilities. After getting listed the project expects dump on the prices due to the greediness of the bounty hunters and investors.

Dont took always the blame into the hunters,havent you considered on how much % do bounty hunters do own or being distributed? Its usually 1-2% of the entire supply on a project.So i dont see for them as the primary reason of such dump, the main dumpers are the investors itself.Common thing that do happen on all projects when get listed into a new exchange its price tends to go down.

[BitTraderCute]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

I think that similar projects of the bounty campaign are no longer needed because they only cause laughter with their size of rewards. It would be better if they spent the money on regular advertising on specialized sites.

they should allocate their bounty campaign fund into advertizing to make their projects become popular.bounty campaign didn't help alot to do this, they need breakthrough and unusually way.maybe paying reputable media and write about them will make it popular.

[dark08]

I notice that some coins that are already in the market are doing bounty campaign again like Credits, Veil Eterbase and among others, do you think it's important for a coins/tokens that are already listed to run a bounty campaign from time to time even if they are already listed in exchanges.

Promotion plus exposure is one big factor that need on any project even if you are already listed in any exchange site look some project they conrinue to promote in the market to spread in the market their project concept.

[KofiAdepa]

Most projects come in phases and with time they have to carry bounties to serve as a reward system for it members it is a form for creating high level awareness unlike the new coins who just list their coins with no one going in for

[fosamede]

The goal of a bounty is to create more awareness and as such attract investors or users. In the case of ICO bounties, they are meant to collect funds for the start of the project. Subsequent investments to keep the project afloat. Veil never did an ICO for example, so funding the project was primarily through tokens sales and appreciation on exchange. Others basically need to keep the trade volume up so as to give value to the tokens. No investment survives without new investors or users.

[confreslamp]

A great way to keep marketing on a great level. There are tons of participants that wish to earn coins that are already listed and such bounties are giving such an opportunity. Moreover, such marketing helps to keep the trading volume on a good level.

[b1boy]

It will truly be pleasant if such change could be taken a gander at yet truly most projects require a large number of dollars to begin and this will go far to crush numerous projects. Lets trust something positive end up benefitting the two gatherings.