Game Protect flag

[Foxpup]

Which word are you finding difficult to understand, Big Brain?

"is at high risk of losing money"

word noun
one of the units of speech or writing that native speakers of a language usually regard as the smallest isolable meaningful element of the language, although linguists would analyse these further into morphemes

(emphasis added)

[1715244749]

1715244749

[1715244749]

1715244749

[1715244749]

1715244749

[actmyname]

To publicly judge someone based on beliefs is a serious violation of human rights!

Therefore, you're violating our rights because you're calling all of these users mentally-ill based on their beliefs? Their support of a flag against you?

Dig more holes, Columbus. Maybe you'll discover the spices you're hoping to find.

[game-protect]

To publicly judge someone based on beliefs is a serious violation of human rights!

Therefore, you're violating our rights because you're calling all of these users mentally-ill based on their beliefs? Their support of a flag against you?

Now a brain should be able to understand the difference between beliefs and facts!

Some bitcointalk accounts believe something that has nothing to do with the reality! If someone believe things that has nothing to do with the reality, that highly indicates that he is extremely mentally ill!

Whereas I call some bitcointalk accounts extremely mentally ill based on the fact that they believe something that has nothing to do with the reality!

[bob123]

If someone believe things that has nothing to do with the reality, that highly indicates that he is extremely mentally ill!

So that also applies to anyone believing in god or whatever religion ?

Such an ingenious statement of you. I see, you are a person full of professionalism and brainpower 

[game-protect]

If someone believe things that has nothing to do with the reality, that highly indicates that he is extremely mentally ill!

So that also applies to anyone believing in god or whatever religion ?

Is Game Protect a religion?

[bob123]

Is Game Protect a religion?

No, it's a scam.

[game-protect]

Is Game Protect a religion?

No, it's a scam.

If it is a scam, why do not you put the proof on the table and get 5 BTC instead of spamming your signature for cents?

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much?

[bob123]

If it is a scam, why do not you put the proof on the table and get 5 BTC instead of spamming your signature for cents?

At least 5 people have proven that already.

And the fact that you didn't pay them just shows that you are a lying scammer²

I could gather another proof, but you wouldn't pay me either. Scammer gonna scam.

[game-protect]

If it is a scam, why do not you put the proof on the table and get 5 BTC instead of spamming your signature for cents?

At least 5 people have proven that already.

Where is proof of who I scammed and for how much?

So far I only have seen extremely mentally ill brain wash nonsense shit!

[yogg]

Now a brain should be able to understand the difference between beliefs and facts!

Yes. Thus bringing the question : maybe you lack one ?   (a brain, in case you don't understand)

Fact :



Belief :




If you mistake something like this, how possibly can you win a case in court ?

[game-protect]

If you mistake something like this, how possibly can you win a case in court ?

Because court cases run based on real world laws and rules and not based on separate fantasy dream world nonsense!

You surely missed it, but bitcointalk.org mistake here!

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution

Explain me one thing?

Believe means not knowing and therefore many bitcointalk accounts do not know that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money.

Now comes the part I do not understand:

If many bitcointalk accounts confirm that anyone dealing with Game Protect is not at a high risk of losing money, why does bitcointalk state a warning?

[bob123]

Because court cases run based on real world laws and rules and not based on separate fantasy dream world nonsense!

Is this really the reason ?
Or is it more like because you never got that far ?

Let me guess.. you received a few requests and were able to scam 2 or 3 of them. And the rest didn't fall for your scam.

Now comes the part I do not understand

There are so many things you do not understand..

If many bitcointalk accounts confirm that anyone dealing with Game Protect is not at a high risk of losing money, why does bitcointalk state a warning?

No one did that.
I think you might be blind. Your flag has 30 DT's supporting it and 0 opposing it.

30 to 0.

30 to 0.

If there were a flag which would say "this idiot is a mentally ill scammer", you would be the first to receive this flag. And again with 0 DT oppositions. Believe me.

[suchmoon]

What does "is at a high risk of losing money" mean?

Which word are you finding difficult to understand, Big Brain?

"is at high risk of losing money"

Ok, I think we found the root of all your issues. You don't understand English.

[game-protect]

If many bitcointalk accounts confirm that anyone dealing with Game Protect is not at a high risk of losing money, why does bitcointalk state a warning?

No one did that.

Again for mentally handicapped:

1) Believing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money means not knowing!

2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case. Because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!

3) Therefore, (at least based on real world rules and logic) everyone who believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case!

[nutildah]

1) Believing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money means not knowing!

2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case, because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!

No, I'm sorry, but this is not how those words work. Just because somebody doesn't know something for sure doesn't make that thing untrue.

As has been pointed out to you, you are the least trusted member on this forum, and by a lot. You defamed yourself pretty hard since you've been here and you have no one to blame but yourself. Find a different forum to infest with your constant threats and bullying.

Why don't you go peddle your "services" elsewhere?

[actmyname]

Again for mentally handicapped:

1) Believing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money means not knowing!

2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case. Because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!

3) Therefore, (at least based on real world rules and logic) everyone who believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case!

You believe several users are mentally handicapped.
What other beliefs do you not know?

Let's see...

You do not know if the sun will rise tomorrow.
You do not know if any user has proof.
You do not know if any individual other than yourself is a figment of your imagination.
You do not know if you are arguing against yourself.
You do not know if you are schizophrenic.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯Arguments of semantics lead to mentally-ill retarded arguments.

[bob123]

As has been pointed out to you, you are the least trusted member on this forum, and by a lot.

Thats not all he has achieved on this forum.

Some further achievements are:


1) Flag open against him with 30 DT supporting and 0 DT opposing. This might be a record.

2) He totally lost his mind:

I have a question to the below listed extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts:
[...]
- Astargath
[...]

*Astargath answers*

@ Astargath

Your name is not on the list above [...]

 


3) He lacks understanding regarding the difference between a person and an account:

Thank you for confirming that bitcointalk accounts are extremely mentally ill [...]

4) He is the most unfunny clown in the history of bitcointalk:

I can easily get a psycological report that if someone believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases and never scammed anyone, he must be extremely mentally ill!

[game-protect]

1) Believing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money means not knowing!

2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case, because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!

No, I'm sorry, but this is not how those words work. Just because somebody doesn't know something for sure doesn't make that thing untrue.

In the real world you can not sentence someone to lifetime in prison only because not knowing that he killed someone does not exclude it!!!

In the real world it is also an offense to publicly warn about something you do not know and a public forum is always part of the real world!

Silkroad thought that he is unbeatable with his criminal offenses, until he was convinced of the opposite!

As has been pointed out to you, you are the least trusted member on this forum, and by a lot.

The trust of who did I breach and how?

Only because I create a website claiming that you killed 5 children does not confirm it is true!

In the real world you need proof of claims, otherwise you commit offenses.

[actmyname]

In the real world you can not sentence someone to lifetime in prison only because not knowing that he killed someone does not exclude it!!!

What is your definition of "know"? If we consider it from your analogue of a trial, then that is subjective based on the jurisdiction. Let's assume that it's one that requires evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Then let's take a look at your second remark:

In the real world it is also an offense to warn about something you do not know and a public forum is always part of the real world!

Do we "know" that you are high-risk, beyond a reasonable doubt?

Considering the fact that you are disparaging others from playing at unlicensed casinos and various Curacao license-based casinos, but refuse to identify your own website's license... that seems quite high-risk to me.

As has been pointed out to you, you are the least trusted member on this forum, and by a lot.

The trust of who did I breach and how?

Only because I create a website claiming that you killed 5 children does not confirm it is true!

In the real world you need proof of claims, otherwise you commit offenses.

Prove that we are mentally ill.

[game-protect]

Prove that we are mentally ill.

To believe something that is disproven since 3,5 years and never happened indicates the extreme mental illness!

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: Foxpup, alexrossi, suchmoon, babo, yahoo62278, LFC_Bitcoin, RHavar, SyGambler, bones261, yogg, nutildah, actmyname, Lutpin, DeathAngel, marlboroza, Lafu, subSTRATA, AdolfinWolf, Hhampuz, crwth, bob123, xtraelv, micgoossens, ryzaadit, o_e_l_e_o, iasenko, pandukelana2712, mu_enrico, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, NeuroticFish, Quickseller, Stedsm, eternalgloom, Joel_Jantsen, legendster, Astargath, arwin100, Initscri, asu, TwitchySeal, Royse777, CASlO, Captain Corporate, Csmiami, dragonvslinux, JSRAW, rhomelmabini, CryptoCheckk, BitMastery, WinRateCasino, IMadeYouReadThis, jimmyhate

I can easily get a psycological report that if someone believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases and never scammed anyone, he must be extremely mentally ill!

I would be inclined to agree: if you did not scam anyone...