Game Protect flag

[Stedsm]

I still think Game Protect should be banned. He is spamming the forum with bullshit which should be considered trolling (against the rules). He is also abusing the trust system (Against the rules in extreme cases) and I certainly believe this is an extreme case, not that I give a shit about his trust ratings but he is clearly just a troll or fully delusional person.

Well, don't get me wrong but we're all loving him for all the shit he's spreading here, else if he was to be barred from using the forum he would have been banned already by theymos. He's such a true entertainer that we can't stop ourselves from bumping and buzzing his thread around while talking to the ill-mannered guy who thinks that everyone of us are mentally ill, watch the comment below:

The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts like marlboroza!

Thanks for bumping this thread for more visibility! Any information about fullflush case? 

To my belief, he's just trying to add some extra spice but that's the same old one which now fades away the taste of the dish he's been presenting to our brains.

[1714907516]

1714907516

[Astargath]

I still think Game Protect should be banned. He is spamming the forum with bullshit which should be considered trolling (against the rules). He is also abusing the trust system (Against the rules in extreme cases) and I certainly believe this is an extreme case, not that I give a shit about his trust ratings but he is clearly just a troll or fully delusional person.

Well, don't get me wrong but we're all loving him for all the shit he's spreading here, else if he was to be barred from using the forum he would have been banned already by theymos. He's such a true entertainer that we can't stop ourselves from bumping and buzzing his thread around while talking to the ill-mannered guy who thinks that everyone of us are mentally ill, watch the comment below:

The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts like marlboroza!

Thanks for bumping this thread for more visibility! Any information about fullflush case? 

To my belief, he's just trying to add some extra spice but that's the same old one which now fades away the taste of the dish he's been presenting to our brains.

Sure, it's really fun to read his retarded comments, I'm a big fan of Notbatman, for example. He is the flat earth troll, however, I still think they both deserve a ban, notbatman probably less, he isn't trying to actively scam people like GP.

[game-protect]

marlboroza's honey pot already exposed 75 extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts believing that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 online casino scam reports and no one ever lost money while dealing with game-protect!

Who is next?

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: o48o, actmyname, AdolfinWolf, alexrossi, arwin100, asche, Astargath, asu, babo, BayAreaCoins, BitMastery, bob123, bones261, cabalism13, Captain Corporate, casinobru, CASIO, Cloudbet, crwth, CryptoCheckk, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Csmiami, dantee1, DaveF, DeathAngel, DireWolfM14, dragonvslinux, eaLiTy, erikalui, eternalgloom, Foxpup, goinmerry, Hhampuz, iasenko, IMadeYouReadThis, Initscri, jimmyhate, Joel_Jantsen, JSRAW, Quickseller, Kevinn22, Lafu, legendster, leowonderful, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07_alt, Lutpin, marlboroza, Mauser 98, micgoossens, mindrust, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, pandukelana2712, RHavar, rhomelmabini, Royse777, ryzaadit, Slow death, Stedsm, subSTRATA, suchmoon, suzanne5223, SyGambler, TwitchySeal, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yogg, Zwei

[marlboroza]

~

How is full flush case going?

[NeuroticFish]

I guess it worth adding it here, at least for the record.
I've just read a scam accusation against gp: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189 (and a copy http://archive.is/H1Q4h )

[yogg]

I guess it worth adding it here, at least for the record.
I've just read a scam accusation against gp: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189 (and a copy http://archive.is/H1Q4h )

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

GP is a trickster. But yeah, scams are not moderated.  

[game-protect]

GP is able/allowed to report bitcointalk.org to the FBI!

[TwitchySeal]

GP is able/allowed to report bitcointalk.org to the FBI!

https://archive.is/FYJhj

[Initscri]

GP is able/allowed to report bitcointalk.org to the FBI!

Have you honestly gone mad?

[NeuroticFish]

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

Yep, that's what I thought. If that claim is genuine, that OP has to be helped in this direction (flag).

GP is a trickster. But yeah, scams are not moderated.  

I know; that's why we have to make sure we use the tools provided.

[hacker1001101001]

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

You are wrong, as type 1 flag would not give GP this tag "!!!" you are talking about. GP already has 2 active type 1 flags on his profile.

You would have to go with starting a contract violation flag, which would give the user a " Trade with extreme caution" and "!!!" sign on his profile.

But there is a thing to be followed , to start such type of flag against anyone.

Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?

Correct.

So, if the victim in the mentioned thread would do so, it would be better.

[yogg]

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

You are wrong, as type 1 flag would not give GP this tag "!!!" you are talking about. GP already has 2 active type 1 flags on his profile.

Hah.
Thanks for rectifying my post.
I thought type 1 flags were the ones for the breach of agreement, and the type 3 the ones based off forum users opinions.
Mistaken both, but anyway, OP of that other thread can give him the type 3 flag. Based off elements I'll support that as well.

[Rooftop Sniper Rifle]

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

[suchmoon]

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

I was wondering who was behind this recent onslaught of weirdly-named noob accounts. Thank you for letting us know. You're still a piddly scammer with a net worth of about 200 euro.

[Foxpup]

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

Good for you. I'm sure you won't mind telling us the name of the casino in question, or the exact means by which you got your BTC back, or any other little details that might back up your story.

[actmyname]

Good for you. I'm sure you won't mind telling us the name of the casino in question, or the exact means by which you got your BTC back, or any other little details that might back up your story.

Shame on you, Foxpup!

Of course the victim can't give out any personal details... that would be obviously compromising their information, and we can't have that. (there's always an excuse)

[game-protect]

The claimant needed to sign a NDA

[actmyname]

The claimant needed to sign a NDA

And there it is. The ever-expected excuse.

It is pretty easy to come up with a couple dozen reasons as to why you can't provide some information: you want to imply, "the onus is on the accuser," but of course when we look at the bigger picture, what we see is that someone is claiming you helped them... without any evidence.

This means that pragmatically, we know not whether the user in question is you, me, or anyone that actually was helped by you.You might say that this is similar to the scam accusation, but the issue is that by ignoring a scam accusation rather than positive feedback you are merely showing a selective bias against any dissent. This leads me to assume that despite any scam accusations that have come out, are coming out, or will come out, you will refuse to answer them regardless of validity.

That, in my opinion, is not behavior indicative of a professional service.

[game-protect]

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Real world court, police, lawyers or private detectives do not spam its signature for cents.  

Therefore your opinion is not worth 5 cents!

[actmyname]

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Well, you certainly haven't shown any evidence of you being an "online casino claims enforcement expert" yet.

Pragmatically, you are as much of an "online casino claims enforcement expert" as I am.

Real world court, police, lawyers or private detectives do not spam its signature for cents. 

You do not know this and are stating an opinion.

Therefore your opinion is not worth 5 cents!

It is your opinion that my opinion is not worth 5 cents.

This may or may not be true, but the answer to the question "is my opinion worth 5 cents" depends more on what my opinion is, what the topic is about, and what the value of 5 cents is.