Nano is better than Bitcoin! Do you hold any?

[semobo]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

yes in future then I know currencies had the unique future value so that I am also trying to invest in it but the chances was not till there available for me but everyone needs to invest in nano also because it had the good future also like Bitcoin.

[makishart]

I do agree that nano has better tech and is good in many critical things that btc lacks but still as a fan of btc i will keep holding it because i know its worth and future potential. On the other hand i do not hold any nano yet but i will look if i found a good entry point i may buy some.

I don't agree with it. Nano is winning in the scalability but that's centralized blockchain when the validators are fully automated without need any help from the miners and that already replaced by the servers.
Nano doesn't seem good anymore because what we are looking for is utility usage.

[Iceblast]

comparison of nano and bitcoin I think it will be very far. now if you look at the percentage of price between bitcoin and nano it is very far. so I think this is not something that might not be suitable to be juxtaposed. and nano is not a competitor of bitcoin.

[aioc]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

I believe in Nano I used to be one of it's worker in it's very popular faucet, but right now everything is on Bitcoin the momentum is on Bitcoin, Nano is a good coin to use and to hold as their is no fee involved and one of the coin that has potential in the future, but it will not get there, if we are not going to help Bitcoin to get in it's best place in the market.

[jazmuzika217]

I did not holding any nano because I know it will not live in long term unlike bitcoin. Because they have too much promos and I think this is not good in this industry. And for me bitcoin is better unlike other coin like nano or other new coin that are famous. Because all we know that bitcoin is already prove itself even that there are so many trials of ups and down it can stay alive in a decade.

[arpon11]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

Nano may have best technology and other quality you have mentioned but last week one of the world leaders refer to altcoins as "shitcoins"! It means bitcoin is the only coins that can stand for cryptocurrency both now and in the future. We have many coins that are now living in the past and nobody or few people are buying them now but bitcoin is increasing its dominant on the cryptocurrency market and that dominant keep increasing daily and I think nano is one of those coins that bitcoin is dominating. The future is there for us to look into what is happening now.

[Marnihughes82]

haha, there are many good coins equal to or better than nano, but their prices are still not good. No one or anything can replace bitcoin. Bitcoin represents crypto and is a pioneer in blockchain technology

[TimeTeller]

All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC

It is not about people being crazy about bitcoin, if Nano really want to push their product, they need to do it and stop having this type of excuses, everyone already knows that bitcoin is the main dominance in the market and there is no point competing with bitcoin, but what of other coins that are taking the position of NANO, if NANO is as perfect as it seems to you, then by now, they should have been sitting on third place and not XRP, so bitcoin being the dominance is not an excuse for them not to at least be among the top 5 coins.

Nano is not the only coins that have this feature too or cheap, EOS is also a better technology and many more of them, rather than comparing with BTC, they should just continue to do their own great work and continue pushing it till they get what they want.

This is really true. Nano should not compare themselves to what bitcoin is enjoying right now regarding its popularity and usage.
Bitcoin should serve as inspiration for them to aspire big things in crypto.
The development team should continue to strive for the betterment of the crypto community.
Though many are saying that Nano outperforms btc in terms of technology, yet, they need to show it by the number of users who are benefiting such great technology.

[baigreen]

You are 10 years old in cryptocurrency and have not yet understood that there is nothing better than Bitcoin? This is the basis of all cryptocurrencies. And the whole investor vseravno that someone faster or slower. Trust is the engine that still holds this market. There will be no confidence and there will be no market.

[Drai]

Bitcoin is the first Cryptocurrency to ever exist and in my opinion it is basically an experiment so you don't expect it to have all the good features  considering how far blockchain technology has come.. but saying that Nano is better than bitcoin is like saying that a 2019 model Toyota is better than a 1995 Toyota, you are basically stating the obvious... But the fact remains that bitcoin is the first and is the most recognised even though there are better blockchains out there and most are even better than Nano.

[rdewilde]

That's really a good analysis on Nano, but however I can't believe there is any coin better than Bitcoin not even the number 2 which is ETH. Bitcoin has lasted years thereby growing from strength to strength while being valuable with each passing day or year. Bitcoin is already on the way to getting into every nook and cranny of this world; almost everyone in this space holds Bitcoin but how many holds Nano?.

[NathanJB]

Tell that to all the members here on BITCOINtalk. Please, if you really want to promote Nano, do it in a way that is worthy of your payment.  Do not attempt to promote it comparing to the very reason why Nano is here in the first place. Compare it to other altcoins within Nano's level. Do not compare an altcoin with Bitcoin as if Bitcoin needs to go. Because if that happens, Nano will also die.

[Bravext]

This is laughable, ethereum is the founder of smart contracts and so many other cool things like tokens within a blockchain, but you don't see Vitalik Buterin going around blowing trumpets about it, Bitcoin is quite old but it is the first and would remain the best in the eyes of most.

[wack slacker]

Bitcoin is a crypto dispersed and a worldwide network. Bitcoin's value has been validated over the years and the Bitcoin community is bigger than any other crypto. Bitcoin is unique, cannot be banned by any country. Bitcoin represents the will of the people of the whole world, a symbol of independence, freedom and happiness. All investors want to own multiple bitcoin.
And Nano is better in technology, but history and community are not comparable to Bitcoin.

[GREENch]

BestAltcoinHunter, tell us more in detail than you were so attracted by the Nano technology that you decided to advise us of this cryptocurrency.

[ducdr]

Even there are more altcoins or tokens that have much faster transaction speed, and more powerful capacity to solve and confirm transactions, bitcoin is a unique one. It is a founder (I think we can call bitcoin like this), the grandfather of crypto currencies. In brief, I don't think we should compare bitcoin with any other crypto currencies, not only NANO. Better than bitcoin, but what for? Because we don't need anything to replace bitcoin.

[Icologies]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

obviously different if you equate nano with bitcoin. Although bitcoin is expensive bitcoin is very popular with the largest volume and clear concept, it is only natural that the exchange is more than nano. you can't compare nano with bitcoin.

[Free1bitco.in]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

obviously different if you equate nano with bitcoin. Although bitcoin is expensive bitcoin is very popular with the largest volume and clear concept, it is only natural that the exchange is more than nano. you can't compare nano with bitcoin.

in fact, there are more users of bitcoin than nano, but the speed of bitcoin is still quite stable, and fast. when nano users have exceeded the limit, it will definitely come back slow and need to update the system. well, but of course nano is a pretty good coin, but I think bitcoin is still much better than that.

[martychubbs]

the argument is pretty vague. There would be no Nano is if there was no Bitcoin. It is the king of crypto. Transaction fee is higher because its price is very high. Nano does have a higher speed as compared to Bitcoin, but in value, investors trust Bitcoin more than any other coin, so I am happy with BTC.

[Novatech8]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

Nano project is not the only coin that has better tech than bitcoin,we have many good altcoins that are better than bitcoin tech but old is gold,bitcoin is just more favoured by investors and community than any altcoins so dont compare nano with bitcoin,nano cant withstand what bitcoin went through,i dont invest in nano but i have better altcoins in my portfolio thats better than nano,crypto space is big world full of good and bad altcoins