Nano is better than Bitcoin! Do you hold any?

[IVEXO]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

In nano do you mean Xem blockchain/token ?
The blockchain is an embarrassment to the blockchain world; it is not easy to use
Neither does it’s app work functionally

Nem is overrated; and is not anything closer to xlm

[tranduong123]

All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC

[Neovitadi]

All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC

Bitcoin is much older than Nano so I would think that Bitcoin has more people interested in helping with the development of BTC.
Nano may not be able to out perform Bitcoin in the long-run.

[MonsterV]

I never hold Nano coins because I have no proper information of the whole platform, and I think this is also a regular altcoin next to bitcoin and ethereum. When they said it's bettee with bitcoin, well it's their impression and commendable comments. Bitcoin holding still the one I prefer to, and I won't think any other options unless btc price stabilized at very high value.

same bro, I always follow what is being traded in the market, most people will override the features and reliability of coins. Even if I compare, monero is better than nano, but finally what I hold is bitcoin, eth, bnb, xrp, etc. Now people are more concerned with profits, they don't care about the technology that exists in every coin.

[coin-investor]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

I should have not sold all Mrai if I knew they are to evolve to something as great as their current position they are now on the 46th position in the market and with price at $1.13 cents this is a huge jump from only a pennies per mrai, but I don't like the comparison, I think Bitcoin is the superior coin because it started the revolution, maybe Nano will soon have it's own time.

[Herbert2020]

LOL another delusional newbie who has read some altcoin advertisement online and now thinks he has found some "superior" and "new" technology compared to bitcoin while not knowing that majority of altcoins are exact copies of bitcoin and the things they change always lead to less security and serious flaws in them.

investment-wise, since that is what OP is interested in, NANO is a terrible investment because of its huge supply that has no control and is on the boarder of being unlimited and that gives it such a huge inflation.
not to mention that in all these years that it has existed, it doesn't even have a single real adoption case. how can it be so much better as OP claims and still be useless?

[pinoy.bolanon]

I dont think NANO is better than bitcoin, and i dont think it would happen, yes i know that NANO has a lot of improvements compared to bitcoin, but i would still stick to bitcoin,because it is easy to liquidate compared to NANO, we have our own local exchanger here in the Philippines but they dont accept NANO that is the reason why i dont buy this coin, but maybe in the long run i could, we never know.

[globalking]

maybe nano is good but it can beat or replace bitcoin because bitcoin is the father of all no matter what the new technologies come but bitcoin remains on the top.

[Findingnemo]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

So you can live with your Nano no need to to buy any more Bitcoins.

If you think you are still need to buy Bitcoin to ensure the security of your funds in future then this can be the answer for your own question no need to convince anyone here anymore.

[rdluffy]

Nano is a good coin, no doubt, but I already lost some money because nano
I lost coins with Bitgrail and then I buy a few coins in ATH 

So I prefer to invest in BTC and ETH
At the moment I'm not holding any nano in my portfolio

[irixo10]

You are right though and I agree with you to an extent. Nano is good, no argument on that  but what makes you think it will last long term just like Bitcoin has done? There have been many projects who said they will beat Bitcoin but they are no where to be found. There are also some which offered high TPS but yet Bitcoin is still king. People believes in Bitcoin because it has stand the test of time amidst all challenges.

[novusordo]

Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
 
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
 
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
 
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
 
Why aren't you holding any nano?

I can mention over ten blockchain coins that claims or atleast is faster than bitcoin in scalability and cheaper but It seems most of you fans boys don't really get it a times. Bitcoin is king, all altcoins are built on it. It's value is omniscience and no altcoin can usurp its position in the cryptocurrency market

[jerry0]

Did anyone buy nano when it came out and it was 0.01?  How would anyone even know about new coins that just came out?


I took a look and at the highest point, it hit 37 dollars.  So let someone spent $1000 and bought 100000 nano.  By the time nano hit 1 dollar, which is 100x... that $1000 is now $1,000,000.  Then it hit 20 dollars and was around those prices for a short while.  So basically when it was 20 dollars, 100000 nano is worth over 2 million dollars.


Has there been any coins recently that ever went this high?  I mean even right now nano is over 1 dollar.  Anyone that bought it at 1 cent and never sold it... its still over 100x when it came out.  That mean 1000 dollars worth of 100000 nano is still worth 100,000 usd.  That is amazing.

[42K]

No way. Nano can never ever be better than bitcoin. Bitcoin is and will  still be the king of cryptocurrency business because its backed by large community. Bitcoin will always be the father of cryptocurrency

[Youghoor]

Well, we are all entitle to your own opinions and assumptions. If you think Nano is better than Bitcoin, thus your view.  All cryptocurrencies including Nano were inspired by Bitcoin and its blockchain network protocol. Majority of these coins uses bitcoin algorithm as their foundation protocol to build their blockchain network on. This simply shows that, Bitcoin is the king and no other coin can take that away ..

[Flezy]

You have done well by comparing them but let me ask, if you subject Nano to the same challenges Bitcoin passed through over the years do you think it will scale through? Bitcoin is still valuable because it has won the trust of the users in this space. Nevertheless, I love good projects, I will check out Nano later on.

[Ziskinberg]

No way. Nano can never ever be better than bitcoin. Bitcoin is and will  still be the king of cryptocurrency business because its backed by large community. Bitcoin will always be the father of cryptocurrency

It would take a lot of time if Nano want's to replace Bitcoin but the community won't allow that, none of the altcoins can compete with bitcoin at the moment as even combining all of them, bitcoin is still very dominant with 65% dominant rate and that was an increase, probably the highest this year.

[jerry0]

Any thoughts on nano as of now?

[redsun114]

All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC

It is not about people being crazy about bitcoin, if Nano really want to push their product, they need to do it and stop having this type of excuses, everyone already knows that bitcoin is the main dominance in the market and there is no point competing with bitcoin, but what of other coins that are taking the position of NANO, if NANO is as perfect as it seems to you, then by now, they should have been sitting on third place and not XRP, so bitcoin being the dominance is not an excuse for them not to at least be among the top 5 coins.

Nano is not the only coins that have this feature too or cheap, EOS is also a better technology and many more of them, rather than comparing with BTC, they should just continue to do their own great work and continue pushing it till they get what they want.

[bigcash2011]

I do agree that nano has better tech and is good in many critical things that btc lacks but still as a fan of btc i will keep holding it because i know its worth and future potential. On the other hand i do not hold any nano yet but i will look if i found a good entry point i may buy some.