[BOUNTY] GOLD Stablecoin – $200,000 - payouts in BTC, ETH, GOLD

[Jancuki]

Week 3 (30/09 - 06/10)
Twitter Profile Link: https://twitter.com/robiawwal

Retweet
1. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1176781927887622144
2. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1177568881373863937
3. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178532501746323456
4. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178665956014469120
5. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178665956014469120

Tweet:
1. https://twitter.com/robiawwal/status/1179577753659559936

[molder555]

#Authentication Post
Twitter Campaign: https://twitter.com/jerjerdogs/
Bitcointalk Username: molder555
Country: Philippines

[molder555]

Week 3 (30/09 - 06/10)
Twitter Profile Link: https://twitter.com/jerjerdogs/

Retweets:
1.) https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1179994825862602755
2.) https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1179306637808607236
3.) https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178532501746323456
4.) https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178665956014469120
5.) https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1177568881373863937

Tweet:
1.) https://twitter.com/jerjerdogs/status/1180339293597732865

[SabrinaBianka]

Authentication Post

• Type of campaign: Ambassador

• Type of campaign: Telegram
• Bitcointalk Username: SabrinaBianka
• Country: Philippines
• Linkedin page address: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sabrina-bianka-072836174/

[BrookPotter67]

#JOIN & #Proof of authentication

Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2678976
Bitcointalk Username: BrookPotter67
Telegram Username @BrookPotter67
Campaign Joined:: Content Creation
Video:
languages: English
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI5uKf_PSvY

ETH 0x8999198b1B129F868F6F0cB1Ca7f9C0188Ed4B7B

[terizla]

When start distribution of September ?

[OlegK41]

Twitter Campaign Week 3 (30.09-06.10)
Bitcointalk Username - OlegK41

List of retweets   

1.30-09 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1178600795459203072
2.01-10 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1178942838454837248
3.02-10 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1179295825522040832
4.03-10 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1179659056887291904
5.04-10 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1180083474616782848

List of own tweets

1.05-10 https://twitter.com/vladisllav_v/status/1180477148949356544

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

Twitter week 3
Bitcointalk username: Dacosta Osei-Tutu
Links to retweets:

1. https://mobile.twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1175820592609710081
2. https://mobile.twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1176378111799242753
3 https://mobile.twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1176781927887622144
4 https://mobile.twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1177155696690962433
5 https://mobile.twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1177568881373863937

Link to Tweet:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Christinebeaut4/status/1180507130748526592

[classick1967]

Bitcointalk Username : Classick1967

Bitcointalk URL : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2329779

Telegram : @Classick1966

ERC-20 Wallet : 0x5F1A6E58E31db797f341672245b15C68a4a7507A

Campaign Joined : Blog/Article

Link To Article : https://medium.com/@classick1966/digital-gold-a-safe-way-to-store-and-make-transaction-in-gold-7a7b0d013556

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

The quality not always about the content, most of the content campaigns have some a few different aspects to determine the quality. It could be :

• The unique content
• The relevant topic between the project
• The viewer reaction ( View, Comment, etc)

If you make good content but nobody watch/reading the content, then the content not really can't bring a benefit for the project. Let's see about your video, your video was a screen recording its just a reading website from the website information. Also if you see from the view/comment its was pretty low. Got a low quality was really enough, at least you got some payment for your own work.

I don't know what wrong with these people. I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content, that's how are you doing business? To rate your article it's based on other people review not from you, Of course, if you rate your own you will rete the content as good quality.

How about this....will u say this is also low quality

https://steemit.com/digital/@chucho40/digital-gold

Pls review...pls

Some part of your content was copy-paste from other sources, here the original : https://bebusinessed.com/history/the-history-of-gold/

Your entry should be rejected.

The funny things, they said the team was cant afford to pay the participant. In the past 2 months where are you?, they make a payment was really smooth also you can directly exchange the token to major crypto. Another campaign was paying by a shit token and need to wait a few months to get listed at the exchange, nobody force you to join the bounty if you feels the reward was pretty small then leave it.

[Chris Barth]

Week 3
Twitter campaign
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/Epic4chris
Followers count: 2565

Retweets and Likes

1. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1178185447337533442?s=19
2. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1178543325470744576?s=19
3. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1178909904955990016?s=19
4. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1179268821103906816?s=19
5. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1179660413740306432?s=19

Tweet

1. https://twitter.com/Epic4chris/status/1179807372220522496?s=19

[Chris Barth]

-snip-

The quality not always about the content, most of the content campaigns have some a few different aspects to determine the quality. It could be :

• The unique content
• The relevant topic between the project
• The viewer reaction ( View, Comment, etc)

If you make good content but nobody watch/reading the content, then the content not really can't bring a benefit for the project. Let's see about your video, your video was a screen recording its just a reading website from the website information. Also if you see from the view/comment its was pretty low. Got a low quality was really enough, at least you got some payment for your own work.

I don't know what wrong with these people. I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content, that's how are you doing business? To rate your article it's based on other people review not from you, Of course, if you rate your own you will rete the content as good quality.

How about this....will u say this is also low quality

https://steemit.com/digital/@chucho40/digital-gold

Pls review...pls

Some part of your content was copy-paste from other sources, here the original : https://bebusinessed.com/history/the-history-of-gold/

Your entry should be rejected.

The funny things, they said the team was cant afford to pay the participant. In the past 2 months where are you?, they make a payment was really smooth also you can directly exchange the token to major crypto. Another campaign was paying by a shit token and need to wait a few months to get listed at the exchange, nobody force you to join the bounty if you feels the reward was pretty small then leave it.

"I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content"

LMAO! With all due respect, why didn't they complain last month? Why this month? 🤔. BTW, don't blame them if they delete their content 🤷‍♂. If the company can't pay them then the company shouldn't bother about the content. Ba no be quality? Them delete am na 🤷‍♂ lol.

Peace ✌

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

The company paid them with their own quality content, If the content was marked as "Low Quality" then they will pay for that rate. The shit thing i see, the participant was not really satisfying about the review content from the team they marked the content as "Low Quality" after getting a payment they deleted the content. It means they just like scammed the team.

Checked the spreadsheet, not everyone got "Low Quality" . Marked them as "Low Quality" and they still get the payment, it's mean the team still respect about the user. Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020. The budget divided to a few campaigns, they also don't want the budget out of the fund for the content campaign until the bounty was finished.

Do you want a big payment? Then join the signature campaign if you also care about the "Quality", As far i know the selection for the signature campaign was really strict. They only accepted a quality user.

Just like i was said "If you don't really satisfy from the team decisioun" you can leave/skip the bounty.

The exact amount will depend on the originality of the content, the number of views and comments, and the size of the website's audience.

Don't forget about this, don't just talk about the content cause the review not always based on the content.

[Chris Barth]

-snip-

The company paid them with their own quality content, If the content was marked as "Low Quality" then they will pay for that rate. The shit thing i see, the participant was not really satisfying about the review content from the team they marked the content as "Low Quality" after getting a payment they deleted the content. It means they just like scammed the team.

Checked the spreadsheet, not everyone got "Low Quality" . Marked them as "Low Quality" and they still get the payment, it's mean the team still respect about the user. Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020. The budget divided to a few campaigns, they also don't want the budget out of the fund for the content campaign until the bounty was finished.

Do you want a big payment? Then join the signature campaign if you also care about the "Quality", As far i know the selection for the signature campaign was really strict. They only accepted a quality user.

Just like i was said "If you don't really satisfy from the team decisioun" you can leave/skip the bounty.

The exact amount will depend on the originality of the content, the number of views and comments, and the size of the website's audience.

Don't forget about this, don't just talk about the content cause the review not always based on the content.

Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.

"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue. Thanks for politely telling everyone. That's all the bounty hunters wanted to hear 🤷‍♂.

[sayaya17]

#Proof of authentication
Campaign: Twitter
Bitcointalk Username: sayaya17
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=924739;sa=summary
Twitter profile URL: https://twitter.com/ayanishop1

[karepmuwes]

Week 3

Twitter campaign
Twitter link: https://twitter.com/tonihermawan019
Retweet
1. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178665956014469120
2. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1179306637808607236
3. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1179994825862602755
4. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1178532501746323456
5. https://twitter.com/gold_erc20/status/1177568881373863937
Tweet
1. https://twitter.com/tonihermawan019/status/1180653129559240704

[ryzaadit]

Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.

Cause, still on the calculation phase you already got the payment in august but still don't know whent they will sent the token  -_-. Oh god please read the rules, The most shit thing about bounty hunter always not reading the information bounty but they read/see about the reward.

"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue.

Now they try to solve it.

Honestly, since this bounty using stable token, most of the bounty hunter tries to cheating with copy-paste or using multiple accounts. You can check at these thread most newbie with 1-5 activity join the bounty. The team made a good decision to limited a newbie to join the campaign, i hope the team also make other rules "Maximum content you can create or limited the participant"

The problem only your statement, you accusing them can't afford to pay just because your result content got "Low Quality". I will understand your statement if your article was accepted but they not paid for your content. That's called can't afford to pay.

Chaw, Ended the conversation. I bit lazy to continue argue with someone who can't read the rules.

[cyberdg]

#Authentication Post
Type of campaign: Content
Bitcointalk Username: cyberdg
Article link : https://steemit.com/gold/@cyberjz/digital-gold-stablecoin-fully-backed-by-gold-2
Telegram username: @cyberdg
ERC20 wallet address: 0x225478Ce2388caCD4DB039c0DC6c61AB2E066F89

Excuse me sir, please recheck again for my submission. Because that post doesn't appear on the spreadsheet

[GOLD_official]

How do I contact the telegram promotion campaign? And there is no reward spread sheet on telegram promotion

Dear sieunhan321pro,

Please contact directly to the PM and we will discuss everything.

Regards,
Support Team @ Digital Gold
https://gold.storage (https://gold.storage)

[Manlog]

Week-3(30/9-06/10)
Twitter Campaign:
twitter Profile Url: https://mobile.twitter.com/fakhrul824
Twitter Profile Name: @fakhrul824
Followers: 6500

Retweet+Likes:
1. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180458359373230080
2. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180458284240605184
3. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180050499967434757
4. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180050405574598656
5. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180716393618006018

Tweet:
1. https://twitter.com/fakhrul824/status/1180716618474672129