[SCAM] AskBrains - An AI-driven professional social network

[Phat Buzz Tart]

For me, linkedin is generally a separate social network and our project cannot compete with it, since it is completely fresh in the market.

I have already said that it will take time (maybe several years).

It is foolish to discuss now whether we can compete or not. It depends on so many factors. Time will tell. And we will try.

[1714937620]

1714937620

[1714937620]

1714937620

[Valeriiko]

For me, linkedin is generally a separate social network and our project cannot compete with it, since it is completely fresh in the market.

This is even good, because without competition there would be no progress. Now there is a demand for new social networks on the blockchain.

[holydarkness]

A little confusion on your example, it basically shows a case where an investor-potential whom a developer can't get in touch with, to convince him to invest, are now within reach as the developer ask something to the said investor-potential using your platform, thus gain his interest? And what would the question be, then? "Hi, can you review my proposal?"

You are right. The developer gets the opportunity to contact the investor, but no more.

The developer should carefully approach the choice of the investor (read the description on his account, use the filter with AI). Smart developers usually know in advance who they need from investors (so they can do just a search by name).

"Hi, can you review my proposal?"
Yes, the question may be like this. But I would add it.

We don't guarantee that the investor will be interested in the project. But he will write his opinion and this will help the developer to improve his project/idea.

We just give the opportunity to contact. And what users will talk about and what results they will get is their business. We only control the quality of the answer (it can be negative).

So they will have to pay to get an investor? Sounds a little counterproductive to me, especially as you also claimed yourself that the price won't be cheap. Plus, there's no guarantee that it will be the investor himself that read and give advise. I would imagine some of those expert investors run a lot of business and would probably have no time to read three to five emails asking them to read their proposal because of the payment (that's probably seems small for the investor, but big for a startup project). Afterall, that's why CEO and other businessman have PA.

We give the opportunity to contact. And this is incredibly important for new startups. We personally faced this when we started our work. And yes! We were ready to pay, if only the right person read our letter! Because we were sure that our project could be really interesting! But we received only the standard answer.

The price will determine what expart want to receive from his services. Smart people are able to estimate their time. If the expert realizes that 3-5 emails a day is too much, he can put a cosmic price and will receive one email per year. Moreover, the expert has a few days to reply.

Only account owner (not their helpers) can reply to messages.

I can assume that you are not a founder of a startup ... so you cannot fully understand the importance of our idea. But each day we receiving proposals from investors, which ready to buy our tokens. It suggests that we are doing right things.

There will be no denying that having an investor interest is an important thing for startup, the question lies on whether those startups think it's a good idea to spend some of their limited fund to pay highly for something that's still uncertain. Uncertain not only in the sense if the investor will invest ot not, but also on who actually reads the proposal-disguised-in-question. Thus, my question on how could you be certain that the one read and reply will be the investor themselves instead of their PA. Sure, you can set a rule where only the account owner can reply to messages, but it's not necessarily means the original owner (the investor) give their PA access to their device where the account to your platform are logged into. Thus, ultimately, the PA are the ones replying

[Phat Buzz Tart]

A little confusion on your example, it basically shows a case where an investor-potential whom a developer can't get in touch with, to convince him to invest, are now within reach as the developer ask something to the said investor-potential using your platform, thus gain his interest? And what would the question be, then? "Hi, can you review my proposal?"

You are right. The developer gets the opportunity to contact the investor, but no more.

The developer should carefully approach the choice of the investor (read the description on his account, use the filter with AI). Smart developers usually know in advance who they need from investors (so they can do just a search by name).

"Hi, can you review my proposal?"
Yes, the question may be like this. But I would add it.

We don't guarantee that the investor will be interested in the project. But he will write his opinion and this will help the developer to improve his project/idea.

We just give the opportunity to contact. And what users will talk about and what results they will get is their business. We only control the quality of the answer (it can be negative).

So they will have to pay to get an investor? Sounds a little counterproductive to me, especially as you also claimed yourself that the price won't be cheap. Plus, there's no guarantee that it will be the investor himself that read and give advise. I would imagine some of those expert investors run a lot of business and would probably have no time to read three to five emails asking them to read their proposal because of the payment (that's probably seems small for the investor, but big for a startup project). Afterall, that's why CEO and other businessman have PA.

We give the opportunity to contact. And this is incredibly important for new startups. We personally faced this when we started our work. And yes! We were ready to pay, if only the right person read our letter! Because we were sure that our project could be really interesting! But we received only the standard answer.

The price will determine what expart want to receive from his services. Smart people are able to estimate their time. If the expert realizes that 3-5 emails a day is too much, he can put a cosmic price and will receive one email per year. Moreover, the expert has a few days to reply.

Only account owner (not their helpers) can reply to messages.

I can assume that you are not a founder of a startup ... so you cannot fully understand the importance of our idea. But each day we receiving proposals from investors, which ready to buy our tokens. It suggests that we are doing right things.

There will be no denying that having an investor interest is an important thing for startup, the question lies on whether those startups think it's a good idea to spend some of their limited fund to pay highly for something that's still uncertain. Uncertain not only in the sense if the investor will invest ot not, but also on who actually reads the proposal-disguised-in-question. Thus, my question on how could you be certain that the one read and reply will be the investor themselves instead of their PA. Sure, you can set a rule where only the account owner can reply to messages, but it's not necessarily means the original owner (the investor) give their PA access to their device where the account to your platform are logged into. Thus, ultimately, the PA are the ones replying

First, everywhere there are people who work unfairly. We reduce it as much as possible.

Secondly, we specially create such conditions so that the experts would like to take part on our platform personally. That makes sense.

Thirdly, if you are so worried about this, order a VIDEO CALL!

I hope your issue is resolved. This is nothing to talk about. A large number of people believe that our project has the right to life and invest large sums of money in us. We can't please everyone. I told you everything that could be said about our project. If you do not understand the essence and importance of our idea, then this project is not for you.

[ViktoriiaVel]

First, everywhere there are people who work unfairly. We reduce it as much as possible.

Secondly, we specially create such conditions so that the experts would like to take part on our platform personally. That makes sense.

Thirdly, if you are so worried about this, order a VIDEO CALL!

I hope your issue is resolved. This is nothing to talk about. A large number of people believe that our project has the right to life and invest large sums of money in us. We can't please everyone. I told you everything that could be said about our project. If you do not understand the essence and importance of our idea, then this project is not for you.

Personally, you convinced me! I think that many people, having familiarized themselves with your platform in more detail, will also be passionate about your idea.

[Irina1999]

First, everywhere there are people who work unfairly. We reduce it as much as possible.

Secondly, we specially create such conditions so that the experts would like to take part on our platform personally. That makes sense.

Thirdly, if you are so worried about this, order a VIDEO CALL!

I hope your issue is resolved. This is nothing to talk about. A large number of people believe that our project has the right to life and invest large sums of money in us. We can't please everyone. I told you everything that could be said about our project. If you do not understand the essence and importance of our idea, then this project is not for you.

Personally, you convinced me! I think that many people, having familiarized themselves with your platform in more detail, will also be passionate about your idea.

The very idea of the platform is worth the attention of people, but then everyone will decide for himself whether he should invest or follow the project.

[ZloiRediska]

The dictatorship of the owners of social networks is already fed up with everything. Everyone wants something new and more open and free. Now is a good time to bring a new product to the market.

Decentralized solutions using blockchain technology are what today's social networking markets need. They are open and free. No censorship and dictatorship.

[Tom786Ivanova]

Personally, you convinced me! I think that many people, having familiarized themselves with your platform in more detail, will also be passionate about your idea.

The very idea of the platform is worth the attention of people, but then everyone will decide for himself whether he should invest or follow the project.
[/quote]
I personally liked the idea of these guys. I think that such decisions aimed at integrating blockchain technology into the real economy are great!

[Phat Buzz Tart]

This is even good, because without competition there would be no progress. Now there is a demand for new social networks on the blockchain.

The dictatorship of the owners of social networks is already fed up with everything. Everyone wants something new and more open and free. Now is a good time to bring a new product to the market.

Open and free???

Have you ever read the project description?

I advise you to read at least some information before writing comments.

[bryan_cryptomania]

Open and free???

Have you ever read the project description?

I advise you to read at least some information before writing comments.

I think that speaking "about openly and safely" the guys got carried away with the discussion about the competition with Linkedin. ))) Project AskBrains is a slightly different concept. Project AskBrains is incorrect to compare with Lindkind. This is a completely different direction!

I wonder where did you find here the completely different direction?)

Even if founders think that their project will eventually be able to replace Linkedin, maybe you haven't fully understood in this project? I think the guys know better who is their competitor. 

[Phat Buzz Tart]

I wonder where did you find here the completely different direction?)

Even if founders think that their project will eventually be able to replace Linkedin, maybe you haven't fully understood in this project? I think the guys know better who is their competitor. 

Linkedin is just a social network. albeit a professional but just a social network. AskBrains this platform is a place where a client and a customer can make a deal, where a startup will find an investor and so on. I understood correctly? AskBrains is not a place for idle chatter as in Linkedin.

Askbrains is a closed social network.

If the expert is interested in communicating with the user, he can add his account to his favorites. In this case, the user and the expert will be able to communicate, as in a normal social network.

The user can subscribe to expert updates and read his feed. An expert can write his suggestions in the feed, invite users to meetings, etc.

This is a social network. But the expert knows for sure that if he received a message, then from a person who is sure that this message will be of interest to this expert. The expert doesn't receive randomized mindless messages, mailing, as in the usual social. networks.

[booogabooo]

Dear visitors of this page!
We kindly request!
Read information about our project before writing comments.

http://askbrains.com/

https://medium.com/ask-brains/introductory-article-about-askbrains-social-network-bf579be6391c
https://medium.com/ask-brains/benefits-for-users-in-askbrains-network-6da07981777
https://medium.com/ask-brains/benefits-for-experts-in-askbrains-network-1b8554b2d52f

[Fomin-oilL]

I wonder where did you find here the completely different direction?)

Even if founders think that their project will eventually be able to replace Linkedin, maybe you haven't fully understood in this project? I think the guys know better who is their competitor. 

Linkedin is just a social network. albeit a professional but just a social network. AskBrains this platform is a place where a client and a customer can make a deal, where a startup will find an investor and so on. I understood correctly? AskBrains is not a place for idle chatter as in Linkedin.

Linkedin this can be attributed more to the social network for communication than to serious business transactions

[Filatenw]

Better understand in advance about the project or you can read the white paper from this project to find out more about what this project will produce.

before you make a decision about investments, you need to thoroughly study the project, the contract details.

[Valeriiko]

Better understand in advance about the project or you can read the white paper from this project to find out more about what this project will produce.

before you make a decision about investments, you need to thoroughly study the project, the contract details.

If you have little experience, it is better to consult a specialist, because in order to make a complete and impartial analysis of the project, you need experience and knowledge.

[ViktoriiaVel]

Dear visitors of this page!
We kindly request!
Read information about our project before writing comments.

http://askbrains.com/

https://medium.com/ask-brains/introductory-article-about-askbrains-social-network-bf579be6391c
https://medium.com/ask-brains/benefits-for-users-in-askbrains-network-6da07981777
https://medium.com/ask-brains/benefits-for-experts-in-askbrains-network-1b8554b2d52f

I apologize to the admin if we are a little addicted to the discussion and are distracted from the main topic of conversation. Just the industry in which AskBrains project is going to work intersects with Linkedin and other social networks.

[Tom786Ivanova]

Better understand in advance about the project or you can read the white paper from this project to find out more about what this project will produce.

If you are going to invest in a project, then you need to know everything about the project. What is the life of the project team, what makes and so on. Only then can you minimize your risks.

[ZloiRediska]

Of course, I can’t vouch for 100%, because in this world you can’t vouch for anyone at all ... But it seems to me that the AskBrains project team is serious. The idea of the AskBrains project is quite viable and I think that the AskBrains platform will see life and be used by users.

[Levin9Mak]

Of course, I can’t vouch for 100%, because in this world you can’t vouch for anyone at all ... But it seems to me that the AskBrains project team is serious. The idea of the AskBrains project is quite viable and I think that the AskBrains platform will see life and be used by users.

When and where will the IEO be held? I would like to read the conditions.

[Valeriiko]

In this AskBrains project, the team is open and public. They do not look like scams. I think that the investment will be all right.

This is a big plus when the team compromises and makes information about themselves public.