Your opinions on IEOs

[conected]

IEO is better than ICO in my opinion, because at least the exchange party have done their research toward the project before the project listed on their IEO.
and of course, we must do our research and due diligence too. The more peoples doing research about the project, the more we can verify the project is legit or not.

- Your opinion is the opinion of many people until now, people have had enough time to feel about IEO and in summary, a complete replacement is beginning to happen, ICOs will gradually disappear from the market and the new brand is IEO, with more safety features. And agree with you that we should have more research on IEO because IEO has started to stop making too much profit, only a few can make a profit, some other projects do not have an explicit date to list, it no longer has a greatness as in the beginning

[o.ogurlu]

For me, IEO is more preferable than ICO right now. Maybe in the future  new fundraising methods will emerge like IEO, ICO, STO. But for now i choose IEO. Because IEOs organized by top exchanges are pretty reliable. Because projects has to go through the security controls of this exchange to organize the IEO. Also, after IEO, the token is traded on the exchange without waiting too long. So we are not waiting to much for trade this token.

[shoreno]

For me, IEO is more preferable than ICO right now.

i think it will also depend on what exchange are you investing on ieo  . if you invest on ieo that is listed on good exchanges then it will be somehow profitable but i  dont know on other shady exchange  . ico on the other hand also work the same  .

not all ico are good but most of them are only bad  . if you know how to pick a good ico then i will vote for ico than compare to an ieo but if not then better if you can stick on the ieo's since its more easier to spot if they are fake or not  .

[santiPOGI]

IEO or Initial Exchange Offering!
This one is the one they call the REDEEMER! we have lost a lot from ICO before due to many scammed project.
This IEO will bring the activeness of grreat [roject to gather more investors again.
But this one will be another game changer as they will give more money to exchanges, especially big one!

[anggaem]

EIO is nonsense its like gambling we need to hold some coins during the snapshot period and we get the ticket, after that we have to wait whether we get the ticket or not.
I hope you don't invest in IEO anymore because it's no different from gambling.

[benycoin]

It is good way to invest in IEo and forget ICO, for any cases IEO is better and more safe, i hope nothing happen in this new IEO like ICO and find many scammers come to IEO markets

[xOdiumNostrumx]

EIO is nonsense its like gambling we need to hold some coins during the snapshot period and we get the ticket, after that we have to wait whether we get the ticket or not.
I hope you don't invest in IEO anymore because it's no different from gambling.

Well, its a gamble for sure, like almost everything in the crypto space. The main danger is the price decrease of exchange tokens that you are holding. I have seen some reports that indicate a listed token should do at least 5x upon the listing to cover the losses in holding BNB/Huobi etc. tokens.

[khtodo]

Good way to invest, a lot of shit coin in ICO markets, we want to stop ICO a lot of scam

[plast555]

EIO is nonsense its like gambling we need to hold some coins during the snapshot period and we get the ticket, after that we have to wait whether we get the ticket or not.
I hope you don't invest in IEO anymore because it's no different from gambling.

I disagree with this view.
IEOs, none of the IEOs made in Binance, in particular, caused any damage to its investors. It even offered investors a profitable investment opportunity ranging from 2x to 15x.
Moreover, when ICO and IEOs are compared, we can say that IEOs are much safer and more robust. The future of IEO in a good exchange is a bright project.

[poodle63]

in my thinking about IEO it is very good to run in the future. IEO is more trusted for me because all are focused on an exchanger, so only certain people can access it through the KYC verification process, but between IEO and ICO have positive and negative sides ... because both have advantages and disadvantages, if talking about cheating, there has been a lot of launching Altcoin that is not through the IEO cheating and running away with investor money. so in my positive mind before investing then You must be more careful in choosing an IEO or ICO project in the future

IEO is definitely a more secured way to crowdfund from the masses. But, it is a bit more complicated also some people find it unreasonable to submit your data just to get the ticket into investing to IEO. But, still it is a good alternative way for people who are looking for security. To be honest, if only they are not that complicated that would be good.

[fosco333]

Well, peoples prefer to joining IEO in centralized exchange because it will be safer.
Centralized platform will have good control and management than decentralized one.
One big problem in decentralized is scam/fraud. Once this problem can be resolved, peoples may prefer to join ICO than IEO.

[BlacksmithCorporation]

To me IEO is like an upgrade of the ICO, and now it is gradually becoming less attractive as the previous ICO. When IEO first started creating a strong trend, it was difficult to participate on the big floors only a small number of people could participate, then the revised rules everyone had more opportunities but bought it. be less quantity. There are le main because this makes IEO cream more attractive.

[capcaypro]

Many ways IEO is done to facilitate investors but ICO is also still active until now and investors are no longer interested because there is so much fraud on ICO.

[shinratensei_]

It is good way to invest in IEo and forget ICO, for any cases IEO is better and more safe, i hope nothing happen in this new IEO like ICO and find many scammers come to IEO markets

It's not so safe as you said and most of the safest IEOs are running on the trusted exchange site only and as you can see that about so many bad IEOs even running on the various exchange site. You can't say if all of IEOs were safe but what you can say to tell other if IEO that runs on a big exchange site will give more guarantee than IEO that runs on a little exchange site.
But, analyzation is always needed to be caused by so many IEOs are not giving good result.

[bgaf]

One of the things I know up till now is that most of the projects that carry out the IEO on an exchange, 90% of the tokens or coins from the project will be directly listed in the that exchange. Liquidity and security issues are also one of the factors considered by investors.

The bad side.
The possibility for manipulation still exists as long as transparency is not really implemented.

That will be the case for most IEOs why? Its because the whole process is centralized we cannot see the real score even the sales on the IEOs. Though they are saying that they completed some rounds but in reality who can confirm this? Only the exchangw but they cant show the transactions made during the sales or maybe there is no real transactions. Sound fishy but its true.

[khiholangkang]

That will be the case for most IEOs why? Its because the whole process is centralized we cannot see the real score even the sales on the IEOs. Though they are saying that they completed some rounds but in reality who can confirm this? Only the exchangw but they cant show the transactions made during the sales or maybe there is no real transactions. Sound fishy but its true.

I agree with you, if the IEO program can be decentralized maybe this will be more interesting, investors can find out the original statistics of a project that is doing IEO

[slaman29]

It's not so safe as you said and most of the safest IEOs are running on the trusted exchange site only and as you can see that about so many bad IEOs even running on the various exchange site. You can't say if all of IEOs were safe but what you can say to tell other if IEO that runs on a big exchange site will give more guarantee than IEO that runs on a little exchange site.
But, analyzation is always needed to be caused by so many IEOs are not giving good result.

What's safe anyway? Putting money on an exchange is one of the least safest ways you can store cryptocurrency these days, I mean, even a big one like Binance that is supposedly super secure got hacked. And we don't even know for sure if these are really hacks or simply just insider jobs.

And worse? These are the ones we know about. I bet you some are hiding their hacks.

[whtchocla7e]

IEO seems to be successful only in large, reputable and secure trading platforms with high liquidity. I see that Latoken launched ICOs on their platform long before the term IEO was born. However, they did not have great success, not getting money from investors. Successful IEO programs are mostly on large, cross-platform trading platforms. So I think IEO is only really good when it comes to large trading platforms.

[ajaymukund]

Recently, I've seen a lot of positive press regarding IEOs. After all, Binance is already successfully running them, giving ICO projects a chance to shine and many other exchanges are following suit.
My personal opinion is that IEOs should be discouraged. Firstly, it gives more and more power to these centralised exchanges, who are able to charge higher, more ridiculous listing fees for coins as well as extremely large payments to hold IEOs. Their vested interests in this way mean they are less likely to care about vetting projects that may be untrustworthy, leading to even more irresponsible behaviour.

Exchanges are already making far too much from listing fees, so IEOs on top are completely unnecessary. While they are good promotion for coins, such practices cannot be good in the long-term.
Instead, the focus should be easy-to-use decentralised exchanges which don't require intrusive KYC/AML and are much less likely to be corrupt/ill-willed if some DAO-like structure is in place. While blockchain technology has made the storage of data much safer, what is the point if thousands of crypto exchanges hold endless amounts of data on the customers in the same way banks do? The only thing changing is who owns the data, so privacy has not improved. And as crypto adoption increases, so will regulation of exchanges.
We don't want to end up in a situation where to trade any meaningful amount of crypto you have to send your name, address, ID, and bank account details to some exchange which can do whatever it likes with your data.

Your thoughts?

what, I've never seen any KYC ask for a bank account details, this is really weird. If they force you to do so, don't do it and use the money to buy IEO at Binance. It's one of those exchanges that never lets their investors suffer losses because of the price of the token after listing.
Don't give information to such bad exchanges, they will steal your money by some hacking tips.

[takngantuk]

IEO seems to be successful only in large, reputable and secure trading platforms with high liquidity. I see that Latoken launched ICOs on their platform long before the term IEO was born. However, they did not have great success, not getting money from investors. Successful IEO programs are mostly on large, cross-platform trading platforms. So I think IEO is only really good when it comes to large trading platforms.

yes I agree with you, IEO is good only when in large exchanges. for IEO projects in small exchanges, maybe softcap is the best result they can get. and when coins / tokens can be traded too, we can be very much different. small exchanged IEO projects will only be dumped even investors will have difficulty getting profits.