IEO vs ICO my opinion, tell me yours

[Slingshot]

IEO and ICO of these days are almost the same thing and I would say what differentiates them is the exchange. Some exchanges do not even sell coins successfully and listing they ends up not listing according to IEO rate or list with IEO price which before investors could wait for little profits, it will dump on them. A successful and we'll trusted IEO has to come from a reputable exchange if not both ICO and IEO appear samething. I have seen many failed IEO and failed ICO so they are amsot same to be except the exchange IEO is being listed could help make it worth buying.

[Barbut]

IEO and ICO of these days are almost the same thing and I would say what differentiates them is the exchange. Some exchanges do not even sell coins successfully and listing they ends up not listing according to IEO rate or list with IEO price which before investors could wait for little profits, it will dump on them. A successful and we'll trusted IEO has to come from a reputable exchange if not both ICO and IEO appear samething. I have seen many failed IEO and failed ICO so they are amsot same to be except the exchange IEO is being listed could help make it worth buying.

They are the same, but at the same time they aren't. Both are for one purpose, organized sales for gathering funds for the project, it's how these two are the same.
The organization of sale is what makes the difference! In some way when trusted exchange runs the sale and after token gets listed it's like an easier option, with ICO's you never know will they get to some exchange in the first place!

[Drai]

IEO and ICO of these days are almost the same thing and I would say what differentiates them is the exchange. Some exchanges do not even sell coins successfully and listing they ends up not listing according to IEO rate or list with IEO price which before investors could wait for little profits, it will dump on them. A successful and we'll trusted IEO has to come from a reputable exchange if not both ICO and IEO appear samething. I have seen many failed IEO and failed ICO so they are amsot same to be except the exchange IEO is being listed could help make it worth buying.

I really agree with your points, did not think this way yet! ICO and IEO are almost the same! Without a reputed exchange, IEO is doing the same like ICO projects, means no profit at all! Though IEO is more trustworthy than ICO because here exchange verifies the project and they promote it to its investors where ICO is more Anonymous means risk is high here!

[Hasan986]

I would say IEO.  IEO is a big part of a project marketing site.  Here his public sell is done.  Where an exchanger is assigned.  He has to pay a part of his price. In this public sale of a project is done very well.

[rdewilde]

First there isn't anything like hope again for ICOs, they are dead and forgotten and any project going that path will only end up wasting their time because people have had enough of their scams and not ready to give them that power again. Also, in the case of IEO, it is true we are giving exchanges more power and opportunities but what can be done when it looks like the best way, nowadays, someone can invest in an IEO on a good exchange and then decide whether to hold or not; this is entirely different from ICO. I think IEO will stay for a while until there is a more better method.

[OrangeII]

I would say IEO.  IEO is a big part of a project marketing site.  Here his public sell is done.  Where an exchanger is assigned.  He has to pay a part of his price. In this public sale of a project is done very well.

honestly, at this time, ICO was not very interesting. well, I had expected this when IEO was more promising than ICO. moreover, we know that after IEO, tokens will be traded immediately without waiting. however, ICO is currently not so chosen because of the many advantages IEO has.

[VDraci]

To avoid scam we all prefer IEO now, isn't it? But ICO was a better success compared to IEO, back in the days it was so good that every single project were able to raised enough funds successful, until scammers start taking advantages, many loss were never recovered and crypto space loses many investors, IEO is just the only choice we have left now

[Jennygirl]

In my opinion, IEO and ICO are almost similar in the sense that a dubious project still has the ability to get away with the public funds even after holding an IEO. The IEO only increases the expenses or costs of raising funds since the exchange has to be paid for the service of assisting the project in raising funds.

[Script3d]

To avoid scam we all prefer IEO now, isn't it? But ICO was a better success compared to IEO, back in the days it was so good that every single project were able to raised enough funds successful, until scammers start taking advantages, many loss were never recovered and crypto space loses many investors, IEO is just the only choice we have left now

IEO was really popular for a moment until the scammers took advantage of the hype. ICO was really popular before because of the bullrun, scammers would be there if there's a potential victims, because of the scams it gave birth to STO so developers can't run away with the money, i dont know of there's a successful STO project out there, even with IEO there's still alot of scam.

[shollyen]

To avoid scam we all prefer IEO now, isn't it? But ICO was a better success compared to IEO, back in the days it was so good that every single project were able to raised enough funds successful, until scammers start taking advantages, many loss were never recovered and crypto space loses many investors, IEO is just the only choice we have left now

IEO was really popular for a moment until the scammers took advantage of the hype. ICO was really popular before because of the bullrun, scammers would be there if there's a potential victims, because of the scams it gave birth to STO so developers can't run away with the money, i dont know of there's a successful STO project out there, even with IEO there's still alot of scam.

We were deceived into this too. I have never seen any single successful STO. I have witnessed several of them and I noticed that even the ICO that is new in extinction is much better than STO. They come with their project, deceiving us that they already have the backing of the government. That they have legal documents from SEC or from any other financial regulatory body where they operate. Some of them presented a fake document, while some kept on posting the community that they are still working on it. In the end, they all disappeared.
Despite IEO not recorded much of successes when it comes to fundraising as compared with  ICC, it is still the best, because it is more secure when done on a good exchange.

[SyndicateLabs]

I would say IEO.  IEO is a big part of a project marketing site.  Here his public sell is done.  Where an exchanger is assigned.  He has to pay a part of his price. In this public sale of a project is done very well.

honestly, at this time, ICO was not very interesting. well, I had expected this when IEO was more promising than ICO. moreover, we know that after IEO, tokens will be traded immediately without waiting. however, ICO is currently not so chosen because of the many advantages IEO has.

If you participate in an ICO now, 90% of those projects will become scams, and 10% of those projects will be listed in exchanges. But its price will definitely go down many times over the ICO price, so never waste time on ICOs

[nicecrypto]

Ico will still be great if not for the way it was misused by scammers all thanks to free entry and exit in crypto, no binding laws, anyone can pretend to be doing fundraising for a project but only for their selfish interest, scammers destroy the reputation of ico,
Ieo are upgraded version of ico only in this case only the exchange can RIP you off, if there is a good side of ieo, it maybe very little. Even we can see some ieo project that are scam.

[minairia3]

Ico will still be great if not for the way it was misused by scammers all thanks to free entry and exit in crypto

Thats inevitable, I foreseen that ICO process will likely go down and it did happened. Mostly ICOs that have been launched since 2017 are now dead projects and if not already exited and claimed investors money. The problem with this set up is how easy those new projects to launch their platform, I feel that old projects that failed and scam others are just recycling another project until they can get funds and begin again with new one. A loop that has never have end. Good thing IEO enter the scene and prevent those ICO abuser with their illegal activity. Probably they hate those exchange for launching this method. Their business ended.

[TWW]

I would say IEO.  IEO is a big part of a project marketing site.  Here his public sell is done.  Where an exchanger is assigned.  He has to pay a part of his price. In this public sale of a project is done very well.

honestly, at this time, ICO was not very interesting. well, I had expected this when IEO was more promising than ICO. moreover, we know that after IEO, tokens will be traded immediately without waiting. however, ICO is currently not so chosen because of the many advantages IEO has.

If you participate in an ICO now, 90% of those projects will become scams, and 10% of those projects will be listed in exchanges. But its price will definitely go down many times over the ICO price, so never waste time on ICOs

it looks like investor confidence in the ICO project has indeed disappeared. even though there are already claims to be listed on a large exchange also it will not change the views of investors. it would be better for the project developer to consider starting IEO in a large exchange. it will attract more investors.

[soramon]

Both ICO and IEO is good to me. But, since scammer use ICO to fraud people i lost my interest on it. Maybe investor felt too they dont trust ICO anymore. For now the best choice that we have is IEO. From my perspectice IEO is more safer then ICO.