Legendary Member loan defaulted 0.04 BTC (Razerglass)

[shasan]

What happened:: Loan Defaulted

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360915

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg50427412#msg50427412
Archived: https://archive.fo/Y6Uxd#selection-10947.0-11135.7
Amount Scammed: 0.04BTC
Payment Method: BTC
Proof of Payment: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/2b21bbc8045f5ee318891692a744851a73ea34430fb3cbab6972ba9677251e16

Additional Notes: I have waited a long time for the repayment the person login into the bitcointalk account but never responding me.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559

[1714799263]

1714799263

[1714799263]

1714799263

[1714799263]

1714799263

[owlcatz]

I've tagged him red until this is resolved. Good work archiving it etc.

Maybe a flag? :thinkingface:

[shasan]

I've tagged him red until this is resolved. Good work archiving it etc.

Maybe a flag? :thinkingface:

Created already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559

[owlcatz]

Created already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559

Great. Do you have any additional info, has he replied at all via PM etc etc? 

[shasan]

Created already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=559

Great. Do you have any additional info, has he replied at all via PM etc etc?  

Here is the last response by him and that is about 3months ago:

Already 3 weeks passed but still no repayment. Can you please repay the loan? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg50427412#msg50427412

Shasan, please give me time untill the end of May. I will send the full amount with the +50% full interest in 24 days. I am in a huge trouble, I expect understanding by your side.
I know, this is business and you are not supposed to extend the loan for my own mistakes.
There is no chance for me to pay the loan this week and I promise I will send the full amount at mentioned date.
I am really sorry for such situation...
Best regards.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Lending is a very risky business. This must be very hard for you. Legendary member with positive feedback from DT, also a long term active member but was not able to repay only 0.04 BTC.

Either he really is going though tough time and gave up or he his intention was bad from the beginning. Either way, it's not acceptable.

Tagged him and also supported the flag.

[shasan]

Lending is a very risky business. This must be very hard for you. Legendary member with positive feedback from DT, also a long term active member but was not able to repay only 0.04 BTC.

Either he really is going though tough time and gave up or he his intention was bad from the beginning. Either way, it's not acceptable.

Tagged him and also supported the flag.

At the time of repayment, it was below 200$ and at the time of taking loan, it was only 189$.

[The Cryptovator]

Supported red flag and left negative feedback as well. Hope he will respond on this thread in order to resolve issue. I don't think he will damage his forum account just for 0.04BTC. It's not very easy task to build a legendary account now a days. So I can't imagine that je will not repay. PM me if resolved this case.

OP sorry for your loss, and welcome to the community.

[Natalim]

Lending is a very risky business. This must be very hard for you. Legendary member with positive feedback from DT, also a long term active member but was not able to repay only 0.04 BTC.

Either he really is going though tough time and gave up or he his intention was bad from the beginning. Either way, it's not acceptable.

Tagged him and also supported the flag.

At the time of repayment, it was below 200$ and at the time of taking loan, it was only 189$.

This is part of the risk in lending without collateral, as what I've noticed, you have already reported a lot of loan defaulters (correct me if Im wrong), so I suggest you review your terms so you can control the risk. I was not one of your borrower's but I'm just concern on individuals business here as you help us a lot when we are in times of need. Supported.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

This is part of the risk in lending without collateral, as what I've noticed, you have already reported a lot of loan defaulters (correct me if Im wrong), so I suggest you review your terms so you can control the risk. I was not one of your borrower's but I'm just concern on individuals business here as you help us a lot when we are in times of need. Supported.

I wonder if shasan is running the business in profit or lose. I have seen a lot of scam accusations from him of his borrowers defaulted the money. I have seen people to close their lending business here in several times.

DarkStar_ seems a lender who is running the lending business without creating any scam accusations (at least so far I have not spotted any yet). Experience must be a role to consider for this type of business.

[shasan]

This is part of the risk in lending without collateral, as what I've noticed, you have already reported a lot of loan defaulters (correct me if Im wrong), so I suggest you review your terms so you can control the risk. I was not one of your borrower's but I'm just concern on individuals business here as you help us a lot when we are in times of need. Supported.

I wonder if shasan is running the business in profit or lose. I have seen a lot of scam accusations from him of his borrowers defaulted the money. I have seen people to close their lending business here in several times.

DarkStar_ seems a lender who is running the lending business without creating any scam accusations (at least so far I have not spotted any yet). Experience must be a role to consider for this type of business.

DarkStar_ was/is a legendary at least from when I am seeing. As well as DarkStar_ is a DT1 running a good campaign that's why people can give DarkStar_ collateral. I noticed DarkStar_ recently started non-collateral loan but earlier it was collateral base only.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

<snip>

Anyway, I just hope that you are not losing much in this business. Good luck brother.

[aioc]

Lending is a very risky business. This must be very hard for you. Legendary member with positive feedback from DT, also a long term active member but was not able to repay only 0.04 BTC.

Either he really is going though tough time and gave up or he his intention was bad from the beginning. Either way, it's not acceptable.

Tagged him and also supported the flag.

At the time of repayment, it was below 200$ and at the time of taking loan, it was only 189$.

I supported the flag, this is a trust only business you gave him a loan because of his rank, even if the rate is doubled he should do something to pay the loan, if many legendary members will do this, lenders will take out legendary's privileges to get a loan without collateral.

[AB de Royse777]

Flag supported and also left a red tag for the user. I am sorry to know about your lose bud.

At the time of repayment, it was below 200$ and at the time of taking loan, it was only 189$.

0.04BTC is more than $400 in today's price. It's not looking small amount anymore.

if many legendary members will do this, lenders will take out legendary's privileges to get a loan without collateral.

Not all legendary worth to have the respect of a legend. Before spammers, scammers were ranked up easily. Thanks to merit system. An account with seriously earned merit will never do that.

[Saisher]

That's unfortunate that the loan value is now doubled the amount, that's one of the risks of getting a loan, but it's much riskier for lender because it's his loss from this transaction, the guy can continue to post here but I doubt any campaign will accept him if he is tagged by DT1 

[bL4nkcode]

Supported the flag.

I wonder if shasan is running the business in profit or lose. I have seen a lot of scam accusations from him of his borrowers defaulted the money. I have seen people to close their lending business here in several times.

If he's in lose, I guess he closes his lending business already, but it's not.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Supported flag and will be leaving account a negative feedback too. Cases like this, is what discourages present and future lenders from giving out collateral free loan which affects the genuine loan seekers without collateral. The user in question is clearly not interested in paying back the loan because if he/she was but was in loss, with his rank status, the user can easily payback the loan in matter of weeks by joining a quality signature campaign.

Also notice a recent change of email on users account, was this done after or before the loan request/default?.

[shasan]

Supported red flag and left negative feedback as well.

Thank you.

I doubt any campaign will accept him if he is tagged by DT1

ALready tagged and flagged.
Thanks all you guys for supporting the flag.

[DarkStar_]

DarkStar_ seems a lender who is running the lending business without creating any scam accusations (at least so far I have not spotted any yet). Experience must be a role to consider for this type of business.

I've taken a few defaults in the past but for the most part I just tagged them and moved on. Currently I'm offering only low risk loans and haven't had any defaults (yet anyway), while shasan generally charges higher interest but will take larger risks.

[Natalim]

This is part of the risk in lending without collateral, as what I've noticed, you have already reported a lot of loan defaulters (correct me if Im wrong), so I suggest you review your terms so you can control the risk. I was not one of your borrower's but I'm just concern on individuals business here as you help us a lot when we are in times of need. Supported.

I wonder if shasan is running the business in profit or lose. I have seen a lot of scam accusations from him of his borrowers defaulted the money. I have seen people to close their lending business here in several times.

DarkStar_ seems a lender who is running the lending business without creating any scam accusations (at least so far I have not spotted any yet). Experience must be a role to consider for this type of business.

DarkStar_ was/is a legendary at least from when I am seeing. As well as DarkStar_ is a DT1 running a good campaign that's why people can give DarkStar_ collateral. I noticed DarkStar_ recently started non-collateral loan but earlier it was collateral base only.

And so far, his non collateral lending is doing well, so he can be a good example of a successful lender with low defaulths and if you can ask for some tips on how to evaluate a applicants, you should try, hehe.