Why do we have to have a single deal to leave the EU?

[Baronets]

It has cost a fortune for the so-called negotiators to try to create a comprhensive single agreement for the UK to leave the EU. Butr, my understanding is that this is not the planned method for a country to leave the EU. I believe that the countrty resigns it's membership, and then there is a period of up to 2 years for separate trade deals and other agreements to be finalised. Therersa May did nothing to construct these arrangements, and that is why the mis-named "no deal" is referred to as "crashing out". We were told quite specifically that " Brexit means Brexit", and obviously anything else is just a shade of remain.

The Irish backstop problem is a creation of the EU, and is something that should be sorted by the Irish and the UK, and should not be used by the unelected officials to try to prevent the loss of their revenue from the UK. Trade agreements are something that should be negotiated by businessment who understand markets and profit. Austria should not be deprived of its car exports to try to salvage destructive migration policies. Never mind the £36 million so-called divorce bill which has no legal basis, the EU should be negotiatiing the purchase of the shares in the properties and other assets that have been partly funded by the UK.

Lets forget about the deal that was written by the City of London and pushed onto Theresa May ( an ex-employee of the Bank of England ), and set up some individual trade agreements that will benefit everybody.

[Cnut237]

The Irish backstop problem is a creation of the EU

I'm not sure about that. I would say that the UK has caused the problem itself by not thinking about what leaving the EU would actually mean in practice.

The Republic of Ireland is obviously EU and remains in the EU. Both UK and Ireland are opposed to a hard border between N Ire and the south, and any border in the Irish Sea would also be unacceptable to the UK.

The whole situation is ridiculous. We demand to leave! We want a border between the EU and the UK! ... but at the same time the UK is unwilling to accept any possible location for the border. It's demented. It was totally obvious before the vote that any potential border was going to be a problem, but no-one in power seemed to care about it. UK government policy is basically just whatever xenophobic knee-jerk populism they think will get them through the next election or failing that, the next few weeks.

The only workable solution I can see is to get rid of the f***ing Tories.

[squatz1]

The EU has stated that the'll only start negotiations with the UK once again once we have officially left the EU. That's the last that I had read to this point.

Anything that May had gotten from the EU initially wasn't enough for the UK politicians to swallow.

But we do have to remember that the people did vote for this, and the politicians have failed to make it happen to this point. But we do know what Boris is going to do on the topic if need be.

[TimeBits]

It has cost a fortune for the so-called negotiators to try to create a comprhensive single agreement for the UK to leave the EU. Butr, my understanding is that this is not the planned method for a country to leave the EU. I believe that the countrty resigns it's membership, and then there is a period of up to 2 years for separate trade deals and other agreements to be finalised. Therersa May did nothing to construct these arrangements, and that is why the mis-named "no deal" is referred to as "crashing out". We were told quite specifically that " Brexit means Brexit", and obviously anything else is just a shade of remain.

The Irish backstop problem is a creation of the EU, and is something that should be sorted by the Irish and the UK, and should not be used by the unelected officials to try to prevent the loss of their revenue from the UK. Trade agreements are something that should be negotiated by businessment who understand markets and profit. Austria should not be deprived of its car exports to try to salvage destructive migration policies. Never mind the £36 million so-called divorce bill which has no legal basis, the EU should be negotiatiing the purchase of the shares in the properties and other assets that have been partly funded by the UK.

Lets forget about the deal that was written by the City of London and pushed onto Theresa May ( an ex-employee of the Bank of England ), and set up some individual trade agreements that will benefit everybody.

if the uk were allowed to leave the eu it would weaken the position of the jewish supremacists.

they need all their proxies to be able to defeat china and prevent the reunification.

however for the crown of england, exiting would be a good way to regain independence for the eu and the jewish supremacists... but for that great ability would be needed...

I just want the hardware stolen, the rest is none of my business.

China you got this bro. Just don`t kill me thanks, I love dragons , and I know you guys actually made the first computer. Which I am thankful for.