You see the flag against Nekoma2018 is subjective, I of course went through all the details you provided and I did support your flag against ANYONE project account because it makes every sense to do so.
Now Nekoma2018 being the campaign manager who does not have access to the campaign funds, is not capable of scamming anyone to begin with , so this is really confusing to be honest.
Does the community think that the campaign manager MUST secure the funds before starting the campaign? I think other campaign managers would have a more accurate saying on this matter,
If that is the case then Nekoma2018 is guilty, if however campaign mangers are not obligated to secure the payment upfront then Nekoma2018 is not guilty per se , however this statement of yours makes all the difference.
The team have refused to pay the participants and he has admitted to support the decision from the team.
While some people might find him innocent and not to be held responsible for the dev team's actions, his moral duty is to support the participants who deserve to be paid and not turn his back on them , if you could prove the claim I quoted, you will have my support, not that my support matters that much but I am certain that some other people might be thinking the same and that's the reason why you haven't gotten enough support for this flag yet.