Remeber that time ETH doubled its supply using centralization

[TimeBits]

Thank Creator, bitcoin never did that.



https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum-classic/
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/

Do you think that is right of Vitalik Buterin to use his power to go back and change the chain?

Does this not go against core blockchain values? What the fuck is the point of having a blockchain then?

[1715686373]

1715686373

[1715686373]

1715686373

[1715686373]

1715686373

[1715686373]

1715686373

[CoinEraser]

Your post is in the wrong board. You should move it to altcoin section. This board is only for Bitcoin related stuff.  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=67.0

EDIT: Now your thread is on the right board. 

[mk4]

I'm not going to argue about Ethereum's centralization, because it definitely is, but ETC only exists because of a minority disagreeing with the move done by Vitalik(and probably majority of the devs). They literally left ETC to die with very very little development so I don't think ETC matters in terms of ETH's supply, just as BCH and BSV doesn't matter in terms of BTC's supply.

[Herbert2020]

fork coins are not the same coin, they have separate blockchain and separate transactions and separate price. as a result you can't say the "supply" was doubled when they created a copy of their blockchain. ethereum supply is still the same as it has always been (unlimited) but ever since that fork there is a copy called ETH from the original chain called ETC.