which project you are more likely to invest in

[dark08]

Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

Investing in a good project with a real product and developer inside like ethereum, eos and bnb, but right now I put some money in some existing project that come from IEO like matic and one because I believe this project have a bright future.

[nxnqauff]

I personally don't invest in any of the new projects. Trust is the main issue here. Project teams are exploiting the small investors to big investors by one or other way. Better safe than sorry is my opinion. Golden days are gone. Projects like Aeron, Credits, came up and gave good profits to investors.

[Reid]

I will pick number 2 but not your example.

One example is PundiX and GCOX (ACM).
PundiX already have a unit but they are still lacking in numbers. It is still a working progress but have been producing a lot of changes for 2 years I think.
It is slow just like how you identified number 2 option.
GCOX though is high risk. Although most investors are popular faces there is still a risk that it may go sideways or maybe for a long time before it will be fruitful.

[thiscomm]

I prefer number two. because I prefer to slowly progress but with definite results. not to pursue something ambitious but merely talk without proof. and I always follow the same program as number two. indeed the process of running the program took longer but the result they achieved was certainly not just a false promise.

[Weng simok]

Actually the two choices are quite interesting to me, but it seems the second choice is the best choice to be a reference for me to investment in the future, because usually the influence of a product is enough to give a very positive effect for investors, so the slightest development of the product the will certainly affect the movement of token or altcoin prices in the market later

[SaidNurs]

At number one the project is very interesting because the marketing position to the maximum but accompanied by ambitious, ambitious this is what will end up not good

Therefore I will choose number two because the project runs slowly but surely, slowly by evaluating every time, looking at market opportunities. That way the project will be achieved.

[Pelana vreo]

projects that did not do ICO were successful, maybe because the team members had many good partners to collaborate on so the project was successful and I tried to find projects that were almost identical and found souls, some projects that had real products were a good step to have the altcoin we want to hold for the long term

[2Kool4Skewl]

I also choose number two.  It is better to slowly but confidently step up and achieve your goal.  It seems to me that the main quality of the project and not speed.

[cherryganda]

investing in number 1 will have the hype after the project release and there will be a project if the team is real!
investing in number 2 will have the hype at the selling stage of tokens and it will depend on the new exchanges and development in a long run.

Well both are good it depends on the matter that you will have study.

P.S another kind of hype like this thread! way of promotion!

[patz22]

Another exchange? most of them have big problems with trading volume. I don’t think there is space for next one

But if the new exchange is to create a difference in quality and good customer support, it will quickly dominate the crypto market. Don't worry about your life after other exchanges, focus on technology and quality of customer service and you'll succeed.

I would definitely agree with this. You know if this project would be a game changer every thing is possible. Isn't it that binance was new I mean theyre a lot of exchanges when they came in but yet theyre the top right now so what they did? They did it differently and delivered results and keep on improving. Unlike the others.

[ghermghuda]

lol, the second option seems a little skeptical of late buddy. recently I've seen that projects that claim they have their own funds start sugarcoated payments (especially if they're the dividend paying types) and then later things worsens. Nevertheless, projects tht steadily grow are better options.

[Nolimitz84]

Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

I am inclined to invest in this project:https://noia.network/?utm_source=icodrops.You can buy their token here:https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/noia-network/#markets.They have a small capitalization,but a very ambitious idea and team.If You have any questions about the project,You can ask them in the official telegram group:https://t.me/NoiaNetwork.These are the projects I love. Damn they are developing according to the roadmap. That is very rarely seen.But of course better than this project,the signature of which I wear,no.https://auditchain.com

[tabas]

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

Obviously this is just all about PR marketing and there will be no progress with this kind of project. However, how can you determine that they will never release any product and all they do is to be vocal about their idea?

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing.

I removed the example as its obvious the sentiment will go with this description for such kind of project.

[Chuky92]

The second option of course. If you take a clear look, projects like that do well once they seek for funds because investors already knows what they are getting involved with. I have seen few of them, and they are still developing their products and services.
But the first option, once Public sale ends, comes with series of excuses and before hand they will die off.

[adzino]

Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

Kinda feels like you are just advertising the thread. Anyways, obviously its going to be the option number two. Why would someone want to invest on a project that is all talk with no progress? That would be plain stupidity. But, yeah, sadly there are people who fall for their marketing crap and ends up investing on those shit project.
The second option is better since you get to see them slowly developing instead of ideally sitting and blabbering. At least you know that a product is being released eventually.

[cryptofirm]

Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

number two is good, because if a team use their own funds to developing the project,,
thats really big sign if the team member is really serious with their project

[senin]

Just wondering in which project you are more likely to invest in.

1. project with very ambitious plans and very strong marketing.  however, with the great risk that he will never release any product and all this is empty promises.

2. a project that was slowly developing from its own funds, released a working product and just started selling it and after 1,5year on the market released tokens to raise funds for creating more products and make strong marketing. For example this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

Of course, I will choose the second option. I generally don’t like ambitious projects with a lot of hype around them. Such projects, as a rule, always fail.
However, I am used to evaluating the project myself and this criterion is not the most important. First of all, the usefulness of the project and its prospects are important, what tasks it solves for itself and what conveniences it will bring to people.

[Layers318]

I invest in projects with working product because with good product, the demand of the coin keeps coming and this is one of the imperative factors required for the survival of a coin. Also, I'm always on the look out for the expertise level of the team in cryptocurrency and marketing as this will determine how well the coin and project will reach the mass around the globe.

[GanTech]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327261

Good project, are you part of the project team ...? and what benefits are given to us if you participate in the project ..?

Yes i am,
Benefits:
-We offer 30% discount for our services if you pay with our token
-We are releasing and we plan release many new features and services where our token will be mandatory
-20% of received tokens from our users(in payment for services) will be burn, each month.
-In about 2-3 weeks we will release new types of arbitrage scanners in our tool(triangular and futures) and access to them will be available only after payment in tokens.
-In about 2 months we want release totally new system of arbitrage platform where you will be able to deposit funds in our wallet for example 1 BTC and you will be able to use this 1 BTC on all supported exchanges, usually if we support 25 exchanges you would need 25 BTC for this. Thanks to this system our users will be able to do much more trades. User will be trading through our platform, with our funds, it is not possible to withdraw them, he can only make selected trade, he can only make a transaction up to the amount of the deposit, his deposit will be a collateral. If he finishes the transaction successfully, earnings will be added to his wallet, if at a loss it will be taken from his deposit. This system will open new opportunities for two kind of people: traders(just described) and investors who will deposit/borrow funds in exchange for share in trades profits and fees that traders pay for borrowing funds.
-Soon after we will release those described thing we want to release our news agregator with AI as a separate service but connected with our arbitool, arbitool will be importing some data from it. This service will require ArbiTool tokens to pay for alerts and notifications.

So yes we are this no2 option we slowly develop our tool from 1,5 year from our own funds without spending money on marketing. No big promises, just hard work and real products that work and you can test them, try them, buy them! and we listed our token on Altilly Exchange.   

[darylalban]

I've just recently learned about NULS and feel pretty excited on all of the announcements they've made such as their SCO. T