The New World Order with Crypto and Blockchain Technology

[davinchi]

It doesn't require a currency, it can be a token as far as I know. That way you can actually make some sort of middle ground deal with it, it still worth something but it worth something as much as it works, say you are building a blockchain to make sure all transactions are done easily or you are building a blockchain that would carry some data, you provide token for people who would like to use it and yeah people can buy it but at the same time they can use it to earn it as well.

Hence, there is no currency requirement but there needs to be something, even if not currency there has to be something. Aside from that I feel like blockchain technology can go beyond these, one day it will be in everything without any token or currency to help out all the database companies.

[1713483203]

1713483203

[1713483203]

1713483203

[jostorres]

Dollar and bitcoin would be totally different though. People use dollars commonly and as a worldwide currency everywhere they go however dollar is backed by USA which is considered the biggest country in the world by economy, they have many things they are doing wrongly of course and not many people like USA for what they are doing however that doesn't change the fact that they are the biggest economical country in the world (maybe behind china now).

Bitcoin would be governmentless and that creates a whole series of issues with it, nobody can really rely on bitcoin while travelling as much as they trust dollars, you can stand in your house and exchange it to any currency you want but when you are travelling to another country you would still want some dollars and not bitcoin because you would be afraid you can't cash it out there.

[Abiky]

We live in new modern era where technologies play very important role and with time nothing will be possible without them anymore. Blockchain and cryptocurrencies have become some new revolution, I would say, especialy in the world of finances. Still new world order sounds exaggerated to me. They don't have such a big power.

I wouldn't be surprised if Blockchain technology takes over the world anytime soon. After all, it's been proven to be the ideal solution for nearly everything we do in our daily lives. Right now, governments may find it hard to reach a common agreement over something. But with Blockchain and AI this could change, in my opinion. Governments worldwide will realize the true benefits of a single, unitary system that improves efficiency and reduces fraud in every way. If they unite themselves together, then our world might become a better place.

Imagine using a "One World" currency within the future. Every country will rely on a single global Blockchain for all of their transactions. Whenever it's finance, public transportation, proof of ownership, or even proof of identity, Blockchain will fulfill every single area of our world. People won't have to worry about switching currencies or even carrying with physical cash at all. Also, they won't need to carry with passports and such since the worldwide Blockchain system will keep track of everything. It may sound crazy, but if you look at how far technology has advanced these days, anything is possible.

Nonetheless, if a New World Order makes use of Blockchain to its fullest extent, then I believe that privacy among people will no longer exist. Mass surveillance, and a single worldwide currency will keep track of every single individual no matter what. No one could buy or sell anything without gaining access to governments' worldwide Blockchain system. If this becomes a reality, then it'll be hard times for most of us. Just my thoughts

[rose9696]

I really quite like such a modern technology world. Then people will no longer have to cut down trees to make more money or abuse nature more. We can use the internet to transact and perform a lot of different services without affecting the environment.

[topcryptodomains]

I honestly believe that one-world government is very unlikely to happen,
heres why:
"Given the incredible diversity of the world’s people and cultures, it will be difficult to adopt any policy that does not inflict severe harm on at least some groups. The problem of dissident minorities has been difficult to address within individual nation-states. It would be far more severe under a world government." -Ilya Somin

As to a world currency using blockchain, it is a very good idea. Although, it might be difficult to implement without a one-world government.

[1Referee]

I wouldn't be surprised if Blockchain technology takes over the world anytime soon. After all, it's been proven to be the ideal solution for nearly everything we do in our daily lives.

Proven in what way? I don't see anything that the blockchain can improve that for example a database can't.

We're living in a world where for example banks not being efficient can exploit that to charge you ridiculous fees if you want a faster transfer of value. If banks really cared about instant transactions and at the same time wasn't harming to their profits, they could have made sure it was possible even before Bitcoin and thus the blockchain were a thing.

Aside from banks there are countless of other sectors that do not want you to benefit from any form of efficiency. That's how money is made. The efficiency benefits that could be achieved will be privatized while they socialize the cost of their previous not efficient system to you to boost their profit. That's what we will see happen more.

[beerlover]

You may not have one nation in all of the world but you can have an alternative currency for all fiat. Just to give an example right now if you have 100 dollars you can go anywhere in the world and cash that out to local currency and spend it or you can even spend dollars in many places all around the world. That means we have already created a system where there is an alternative currency for all currencies : the dollar.

So, if we can take out the dollar in that sense and replace it with bitcoin than we can have bitcoin as a super expensive price because than people would be buying bitcoin like hell in order to spend it on other nations. Lets not forget that there are billions of dollars going to tourism every year and if bitcoin could get a slice of that market share we would be above 100k already.

[Abiky]

Proven in what way? I don't see anything that the blockchain can improve that for example a database can't.

We're living in a world where for example banks not being efficient can exploit that to charge you ridiculous fees if you want a faster transfer of value. If banks really cared about instant transactions and at the same time wasn't harming to their profits, they could have made sure it was possible even before Bitcoin and thus the blockchain were a thing.

Aside from banks there are countless of other sectors that do not want you to benefit from any form of efficiency. That's how money is made. The efficiency benefits that could be achieved will be privatized while they socialize the cost of their previous not efficient system to you to boost their profit. That's what we will see happen more.

Well for starters, Blockchain technology proves to be better than an ordinary database as it makes use of cryptography and consensus algorithms in order to ensure the integrity of data. It proves to be quite useful for finance, as transactions remain virtually immutable. With a Blockchain ledger, it's much harder to perform corruption or fraud as everything is visible and auditable by anyone. Robust security and high efficiency are one of the things that make Blockchain such a unique technology unlike no other. Given that Bitcoin has been proven to be quite a successful world currency, governments have studied the Blockchain deeper for their own benefit.

A worldwide Blockchain which provides a financial infrastructure backed by governments and central banks seem to be the way of the future. Every day technology is improving at a fast pace and people are adapting towards the modern era. By enabling a "One World Government" along with a "Single, Unitary Currency" the world's countries will behave as a single entity. In my opinion, this could improve our economy for the better. Central Banks will largely benefit from the fees obtained by the global Blockchain ledger. This is similar to miners in crypto land, where they help secure the network in order to earn profits based on fees paid by users of the ledger. Which is why, I believe that it'll be a win-win situation for central banks and governments worldwide.

Nonetheless, a New World Order will take quite some time to become a reality as people are adapting to new technologies at a slow and steady pace. A drastic change from Fiat to government-issued digital currencies needs to happen first, before world domination could happen anytime soon. Once that's done, then worldwide governments could establish a system where they could control everything people do in normal life by using Blockchain technology (and possibly AI) to its fullest potential. Just my thoughts

[SirLancelot]

The decentralized part of it plays a big role as well, like you can't play with it the way you want, governments play with money however they want, they move it around like its not a big deal and they do whatever they want with it, with blockchain they wouldn't be able to because if governmental address is know then we will be capable of seeing where the money goes or how much goes there and we will have a chance to ask what happened to that money.

Governments can't deal with blockchain, even the most honest countries you think that is run like lets say Germany will have a trouble because they will have to respond to every single question and eventually someone will do some corruption that will be caught and from then on its a race to gain votes from people and opposition could always yell "thief" to people who used peoples money for stuff that wasn't in peoples best interest.

[1Referee]

Well for starters, Blockchain technology proves to be better than an ordinary database as it makes use of cryptography and consensus algorithms in order to ensure the integrity of data. It proves to be quite useful for finance, as transactions remain virtually immutable.

I think that your ideal picture of the world using blockchain is a bit too rosy. Bitcoin is immutable, Ethereum to some lower degree is, but the type of blockchains you're referring to (if they ever going to be used on a large scale) will be private chains, ones where you do not get to participate in the consensus model they use.

The benefit (for the entities participating in a specific consensus model) is that data can be altered/removed when needed. Immutability is actually an aspect that isn't useful in most industries where decentralization isn't needed. Mistakes are made all the time, which you can't correct with an immutable blockchain.

Fair voting for example isn't going to be more fair with private blockchains of 'independent' organizations. They are highly susceptible to manipulation. For that you would need Bitcoin, a truly independent and immutable blockchain.

[hatshepsut93]

Well for starters, Blockchain technology proves to be better than an ordinary database as it makes use of cryptography and consensus algorithms in order to ensure the integrity of data. It proves to be quite useful for finance, as transactions remain virtually immutable. With a Blockchain ledger, it's much harder to perform corruption or fraud as everything is visible and auditable by anyone. Robust security and high efficiency are one of the things that make Blockchain such a unique technology unlike no other. Given that Bitcoin has been proven to be quite a successful world currency, governments have studied the Blockchain deeper for their own benefit.

Software engineers have been using cryptography and various algorithms for verifying data integrity for a really long time, nearly as long as programming exists. Blockchain can't work alone, it's just a very bad database if there's only one entity, the point of blockchain is to maintain databases between multiple entities that don't trust each other, and this situation is actually very rare. All these situations of data-tampering that are supposedly cured by blockchain are relatively rare, because existing systems can detect them too. So, even if blockchain worked, it wouldn't be revolutionary, but it has a problem that it actually doesn't work well - there's a lot of problems with it, which is why on practice it's not getting adopted.

[TIDOVEE]

there is technology already on ground that the banks work with, but digital currency is an advancement in the currency state.blockchain would be a great advantage to the world if it could be present to be the only world producing currency, but it will be better currency like dollars or pounds be retained as fiat,to help make balance in the world economy.

[BitHodler]

Fair voting for example isn't going to be more fair with private blockchains of 'independent' organizations. They are highly susceptible to manipulation. For that you would need Bitcoin, a truly independent and immutable blockchain.

Bitcoin hasn't ever really been stress-tested to where we can say it's immutable or not. I think that elections are a fundamental enough incentive to at least see arrows be pointed at Bitcoin from various angles.

Bitcoin in its current form is too innocent to be considered a threat to anything. This might and probably will change the larger its market cap and usage appreciate, but until then we will not find out how immutable Bitcoin really is.

I'm not being negative here, just realistic. Bitcoin's security is unmatched within crypto, but there are threats looming from governments we haven't yet had to deal with. Thus far they just have regulated the market, but what's step two?

[Polo7]

If a New World Order takes effect soon, do you think that all of the world's governments will make use of crypto and Blockchain technology to their fullest potential? Imagine if one world digital currency existed, where every single country makes use of it worldwide. Central Banks will act as nodes and miners of that digital currency, which is backed by the Blockchain. The single, unified Blockchain will prove to become highly scalable for the world, especially since it'll be extremely centralized.

By making use of Blockchain technology for everything, global control will be enforced as it's much easier to track every single transaction made worldwide. Those transactions will not only involve money, but also transfer of ownership, certificates of birth, driver's license, and other services within the global Blockchain system. This may sound crazy, but if you look at the current situation where many Banks and governments have become interested in the technology, it shows us that it will be implemented in every area worldwide within the not-so-distant future.

Nonetheless, what are your thoughts?

What is interesting is that FINTECH Company have developed digital banking system like online banking.
Now they are Behind the Blockchain Technology.


And Theter associates have close ties to KPMG and Fintech Company.
Theter is currency wich dictating the btc price.

So in cryptocurrency we see Bankers dirty hands more and more...
Where it all Will lead us?
But Let's ask from the Bankers, they answer Will be
Ouuu we Got Nothing to do with cryptocurrency...


Then You look at the coinbase Circle poloniex, its all wall street players and they are the bankers.


So clearly bankers have Plan with cryptocurrency

[coinluisa]

If a New World Order takes effect soon, do you think that all of the world's governments will make use of crypto and Blockchain technology to their fullest potential? Imagine if one world digital currency existed, where every single country makes use of it worldwide. Central Banks will act as nodes and miners of that digital currency, which is backed by the Blockchain. The single, unified Blockchain will prove to become highly scalable for the world, especially since it'll be extremely centralized.

By making use of Blockchain technology for everything, global control will be enforced as it's much easier to track every single transaction made worldwide. Those transactions will not only involve money, but also transfer of ownership, certificates of birth, driver's license, and other services within the global Blockchain system. This may sound crazy, but if you look at the current situation where many Banks and governments have become interested in the technology, it shows us that it will be implemented in every area worldwide within the not-so-distant future.

Nonetheless, what are your thoughts?

Not all in every country are have open mind about crypto because some of are thinking that crypto will be harmful for them. For me it's alright if the world will understand what the benefits in crypto even its risky.But of course it depends to the ability of every person and if they take the risk.

[Finestream]

We can't say but IMO, blockchain and crypto can give an improvement in this world, so as long as the government are able to control it through their regulations, I don't think they will not allow it to grow.

People like us sees how big it will help to the current order, imagine from centralized we change the system to decentralized which will then promote real transparency because there is no 3rd party anymore, and I believe this is what we need for everyone to grow as well. With crypto, it will help the small countries that are not reach by banking institution to find opportunity online, because with crypto, they'll be able to receive their money in a faster and cheaper way.

[Abiky]

I think that your ideal picture of the world using blockchain is a bit too rosy. Bitcoin is immutable, Ethereum to some lower degree is, but the type of blockchains you're referring to (if they ever going to be used on a large scale) will be private chains, ones where you do not get to participate in the consensus model they use.

The benefit (for the entities participating in a specific consensus model) is that data can be altered/removed when needed. Immutability is actually an aspect that isn't useful in most industries where decentralization isn't needed. Mistakes are made all the time, which you can't correct with an immutable blockchain.

Fair voting for example isn't going to be more fair with private blockchains of 'independent' organizations. They are highly susceptible to manipulation. For that you would need Bitcoin, a truly independent and immutable blockchain.

Well that makes sense. After all, governments want control over people's transactions. This would be extremely viable with a private Blockchain instead of a public one. While it's no secret that private ledgers are less secure than public ones, they provide many benefits to centralized entities. With a global private blockchain, governments worldwide could enforce their own rules and take the necessary actions with ease. I believe that it'll be quite hard to achieve immutability in a private ledger, as the number of participants are lesser than those in public chains. Not to mention, consensus will be heavily centralized, which makes it easier to revert transactions at will.

The proper model for the New World Order's global currency, would be a DAG instead of a traditional blockchain. DAGs are centralized and perform better than an ordinary blockchain. Governments could this system to their advantage in a similar fashion as a traditional database in order to manipulate transactional activity. The way I see this is that governments will have their own unified currency in the future, while decentralized cryptocurrencies will continue to exist in the mainstream world. Both sides will co-exist given that people will not always use the government's financial system. With a diversity of blockchains, we may be dealing with the Internet of Value within the not-so-distant future.

Nonetheless, by controlling the world's economy with a digital system (either Blockchain, DAGs, or another technology), governments will be able to enforce control over their citizens in a more efficient manner. After all, Blockchain provides the ability to track transactions. Considering that everything is a transaction within the Blockchain (transfer of ownership, identity verifications, notarization, supply chain management, etc) governments could manipulate the world at will. In effect, a New World Order will take place greatly undermining people's privacy as we know it. Just my thoughts

[ajaymukund]

If blockchain technology is good enough and can make it easier for governments to control and conduct transactions, then why doesn't the world technology blockchain?
It really is an opportunity to help people save more time. I fully support this because human society is growing, let technology help this life better.

[SquallLeonhart]

If blockchain technology is good enough and can make it easier for governments to control and conduct transactions, then why doesn't the world technology blockchain?
It really is an opportunity to help people save more time. I fully support this because human society is growing, let technology help this life better.

Nobody will dispute the fact that the technology of blockchain is indeed the answer to some of the problems that has been looking for answer in decade, with blockchain technology adoption and implementation, all those areas if well applied will be fixed. One thing that I like about blockchain technology is that it makes everything transparent and also curb all these situation of duplication of things that we see in government.

Blockchain technology has long been due for countries that are still a little but far behind in term of technology, transparency and in terms of corruption. Countries will even be able to save cost a lot using blockchain because things that would have involved a third party which would be heavily paid for can easily be don using the technology of blockchain as regards the area where is being applied.

[Semosuchi Tesongrato]

If we start talking about conspiracies, we don't know where we can go. It is clear that in the globalized world everything will be different. A period of great conflicts awaits us, which will lead to the construction of this famous new world order.
What will happen then, nobody knows.

Edit: please note that this is my post Nr. 666