IS there any ICO rating websites we can trust.

[aleandromagno]

Each website needs money to maintain its business. Everything is fine if it running from money from advertising. If a service accepts fees for placing information on its website, it will never be objective.

[desticy]

In general, ICO ratings are a pretty inclined topic, even if the experts are professional and conduct their business honestly. However, from all the many rating sites I can still single out icodrops.com
Excellent design, excellent selection of ICO projects and their analysis, as well as an impeccable reputation make me trust this project.
As far as I know, the site has never posted a scam project. There are quite few sites with such a reputation, because in the crypto market many are trying to make money in any way.

[rsbriggs]

There is no ICO rating website that we can trust, It is very difficult to know a good ICO project, both individual and any organization only arrived at their ratings based on team members that submit their KYC documents; only the project teams knows their plans for the project they are trying to offer.

[robelneo]

Each website needs money to maintain its business. Everything is fine if it running from money from advertising. If a service accepts fees for placing information on its website, it will never be objective.

I agree to advertise with a disclaimer and it's is not really promoting what is being advertised on their website, but recommending project through their newsletter and giving them high rating because they were paid to do that is a big no-no and not recommended, unless they can guaranty that the site they are recommending is a legit project and they will be responsible for any scamming, they cannot accept payment and put up a disclaimer that they have no responsibility fot their action.

[seleme]

There is no ICO rating website that we can trust, It is very difficult to know a good ICO project, both individual and any organization only arrived at their ratings based on team members that submit their KYC documents; only the project teams knows their plans for the project they are trying to offer.

It is a big plus to know the team members are honest people and they agree to pass the KYC for clearing the shady questions from the investor's mind. ICO rating websites are outdated nowadays and the new trend of IEO was replaced it. ICOmarks website was my favorite website after the ICObench but I usually compare the projects' trustworthiness on both rating platforms in order to choose the better project after the decent research.

[nonbody]

There are many evaluation websites for ICOs, but there are few websites that can provide real ICO evaluations. In the past, the projects I know through the evaluation website seem to have few successful examples.