I meant in the way that people kept accusing Bitcoin as easy to counterfeit or launder. We've always made the argument that the same can be said for fiat, this one shows that even gold experts can be fooled.
With the fingerprinting, I wonder if pawnshops are equipped to detect doped gold. If I bought cheap gold bars and found out it's not "real" simply because it's lacking some seals, I'd be worried how I'll dispose it to get my money back. If they are doped but can pass through pawnshops undetected I might try to have them crafted into jewelry.
I guess that they now see that there is no system that is free of being used for fraudulent acts, security experts' would have given their strength by not even allowing the bar to enter into world market but even with the securities that they out in place, it still does happen even with gold market.
I think it is even easier that way because gold too does not have limited supply like fiat also, and it could get into the hands of too many people at a particular time, but cryptocurrency have limited supply and it would t always have the supply till future, which means it can be controlled in future, but gold cannot be controlled and that is why its supply cannot even be accounted for, why bitcoin supply can really be accounted for. Well, the bar sleeping into the market is the responsibility of the government anyway.