My opinion about dumps caused by bounty participants.

[timmmers]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

[1714705677]

1714705677

[1714705677]

1714705677

[2tang]

Especially happen dump on the coin because the team lists coin not on the top exchange because hype coins occur on exchanges that have big names or large volumes,demand in the market depends on the strategy or plan of the project developer if the platform has good features in the future certainly demand in the market will go up.on the contrary if the team is not able to give a lot of big news,of course demand for coins will be quiet in the market and every day continues to decline.do you understand that 2% of the total troops will not be able to drop the price of coins in the market

[Kemarit]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

I think you under estimate investors here. I mean they know everything about bounty hunters selling right after the coins is listed on an exchange. Others bought when dumping are done and then hold. But the problem with that strategy is that we are in the bear market and people are not that stupid. And for those who bought prior, I'm sure they will also join the dumping spree here because they wanted to get their profit so that they can reshuffle their funds around, no holding for now in altcoin market.

[fortunecrypto]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

You got it correct and those who are going to buy are those who investors who only bought new coins that just got in the market, they want to see if the token has a good potential in the market, and those who already bought the coin could buy more, you cannot expect new coins that just hit the market will have demands they must show potential in the market first.

[Perfect35]

A lot of projects are now taking some measures to avoid dump, which I believe will change the orientation of investors towards projects in the crypto space.

A lot of them try to now withhold the rewards of bounty hunters and get them paid after a month or two and sometimes more, in order to give the assurance to investors that they are protested and that there will not be unnecessary dump.

Well, this has helped some projects, most especially those with genuine products, however those without good plans and with no useful products, are still being dumped without the involvement if bounty hunters.

[shooleh]

It is crucial that every project should be listed on the exchange which has a large volume. So that investors will see that this is a quality project because it is able to enter in a large exchange. We also can't blame bounty hunters or early investors because of the price of the coin that has dumped.

Bounty hunters get coins for their sales and earn money and are the same as investors. The team and developers work well for the benefit of the investors to buy. So the request and reception are also very large.

[pixie85]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.

You must mean supply and demand.

If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

It's true but if the coins survives first dump the price sometimes goes up. Many people made money by buying into bounty hunter dumps because they were so into getting some money for their work that they ignored what the coin was about and that it could really be valuable and have a big community.

[kaya11]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

Unless all of the coins are sold out on the ICO, the buyers would likely to be the coin makers on the exchange it was registered. This is a strategy . that most of the shit altcoins out there. I remembered one time when most of the bounty hunters sell the coins they've got but still the price did not fall, that was a good coin and the devs are such experts in the field, until now the coin has value and still continues to improve.

[yesyes18]

And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

lol, that's not true buddy. that's a huge fallacy. If only a coin has value, then people will buy buddy. If what you're saying is true then exchanges wouldn't be of any importance because trading will be useless then, but that isn't the case. The case is that project developers are supposed to create value for their projects to attract more investors even after ICO/IEO or whatever.

[spydee1522]

In my very opinion, I do not understand why bounty hunters are always taken for granted and considered as some poor folks somewhere. Why would a bounty hunter with so much trust in a project dump right after listing and how would bounty hunters holding less than 5% of total allocation of a project budget cause dump. Hunters are not cheap to be treated anyhow whenever there is a dump, both hunters, team and investors need money.

[freedomgo]

No bounty hunter that believe in a project would sell of their tokens and no good project will dump because of bounty hunters because if people actually believe in the project there would be more demand than what the bounty Hunters have to sell.

Exactly, the thing is, bounty hunters are only the once selling during the first launch in the exchange because investors are still waiting for the effect of the dump, this is for most cases because most of the projects are listed in a smaller exchange where a bounty dump is heavily felt.

However, if the coin is listed in big exchange, there's nothing to worry as it would not affect the price big time.
Lots of smart investors are waiting for the price to dump so they will all put an order and that will result to price not getting dump, once its in big exchange, that would explain the project has a good potential and with great liquidity, there's not significant dump that will happen.

We need to increase the number of good exchange to solve the liquidity problem so the bounty hunter can dump their reward.
1 or 2% of the total supply even if they dump altogether should not affect a good project.

[kawetsriyanto]

It's true but if the coins survives first dump the price sometimes goes up.

When the coins come from good projects with potential MVP, we shouldn't worry if the prices go down sometimes. Even if the bounty hunters dump the prices, it mustn't last forever and will have a chance to increase.

Many people made money by buying into bounty hunter dumps

Of course, they must be attracted to the lower prices. Many people just wait for dumps to buy IEO or ICO coins nowadays. So, they put aside money for that moment, not buy in IEO or ICO phase.

[marilynmanson21]

It depends on demand of the token itself, and not every project is out of demand after the token sale. For example, a project that holding an IEO and has been sold out, after it's listed on exchange of course the demand will be high. And you also need to know, not every single of bounty participants are planning to sell their token directly on exchange, some of them also willing to hold and make them as an asset.

[shinratensei_]

maybe i should quate if that situation will be happening when there was no a lot of buy orders and that means a big spread between the sell and buy orders. That's why putting a small hardcap to give a lot of room to grow for coin is a must. The developer must not be greedy to grab a lot of money as much as they can if they can't even attract a lot of next buyers.
My point was in the developer team and at least this team can create a buy back program to prevent the dump that will be affecting the price of token but the dev is so greedy and that's the main reason.

[senin]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

Yes, your opinion has a certain meaning. If a new token first appears on the exchange, it is possible that at first it drops in price due to the fact that by this time consumer demand is mostly satisfied. Moreover, those who wanted to buy these tokens received them at big discounts. In addition, it should be borne in mind that a certain part of early investors bought tokens with these significant discounts just for the sake of a quick sale at the ICO price, and therefore the dumping of tokens is inevitable. Therefore, do not blame all the blame for the token drop during this period on bounty hunters.

[Crypto_lion]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

Yeah it's true they do cause pressure in the exchange .that is why projects now a days release the bounties after the project has been listed in the exchange and in parts distributing it over several months

[jumiapaul]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

I think you under estimate investors here. I mean they know everything about bounty hunters selling right after the coins is listed on an exchange. Others bought when dumping are done and then hold. But the problem with that strategy is that we are in the bear market and people are not that stupid. And for those who bought prior, I'm sure they will also join the dumping spree here because they wanted to get their profit so that they can reshuffle their funds around, no holding for now in altcoin market.

I agree with you, its quite difficult to see anyone willing to wait too long for the project development to unfold and the value of the tokens increase. Every investor is in it for the money and are calculative as to how they can benefit maximally. The dump of the tokens after the listing is caused by virtually every holder irrespective of their description. Projects whose value are doing well in the market would barely release bounty tokens, most would release in batches and bounty hunters may have to wait for several months to get all their tokens. I understand that this strategy is also to reduce the dumping of the tokens.

[Upgate]

Many people do not understand offer and demand, how it really works.
If all bounty hunters would like to sell all their tokens (2% of total supply) it is a huge selling pressure. If there are not enough buyers, price is going down until encounters buy orders. And as you can guess, noone wants to buy ICO coins just after the ICO sale because those who wanted buy, they already bought.
Your point of view? 

This doesn't explain dumps caused by anyone. However it would be extremely hard to find an ico where all bounty members would dump the coin at the same time some investors also can work at bounty hunters and has a better thinking about the ico

[yazher]

That's why most of the Project release their bounty payment after 2-3 months because they feared this kind of scenario where the coins they are offering is dump at an alarming rate.

scenes like this are normal in this industry only who knows to ride the wave will survive because the dumping of the bounty participants are unstoppable lets say there will be 100% of participants who holds the coins only 10% will hold it for long the other as soon as it hit the market they will sell it even the price is not good they will not care at all.

[Botnake]

This can be controlled if the team will find a way to minimize the dump, the best strategy to minimize the dump is not to release the entire bounty at ounce. Of course, once the bounty hunters already have their reward, they would not mind of the current price or of the possible effect in the market if they will dump, they just want to cash out and enjoy their earning even if it's lower than what they are expecting.

The bounty hunters will understand if the team will decide to divide the distribution into stages, at least they will received even in a staggered basis.