Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County

[TECSHARE]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

[acroman08]

Damn, that judge should be fired!!! she can't take criticism and using her position to jailed someone just because she felt uncomfortable!?
her dumb ass biased verdict is the reason why the child is dead! F#*k HER!!!

[squatz1]

While I agree that he shouldn't be in trouble, I do think that once the court had put him on some sort of probation relating to it he should've relaxed with it to ensure that the court didn't have an ammunition against him. Because they pretty much can say that he violated his probation, because he did.

I think this is without a doubt bullshit though, and he should begin to sue to town, judge, etc.

[TECSHARE]

While I agree that he shouldn't be in trouble, I do think that once the court had put him on some sort of probation relating to it he should've relaxed with it to ensure that the court didn't have an ammunition against him. Because they pretty much can say that he violated his probation, because he did.

I think this is without a doubt bullshit though, and he should begin to sue to town, judge, etc.

While I agree his actions may have been unwise, as far as I can tell he is basically being charged for publicly airing his grievances with the court. This is specifically protected right, to not only have free speech, but to seek redress of grievances with the government. The court had no legal authority to charge him and place him in this probationary state to begin with (assuming there are no other crimes involved). This judge should be impeached, and this man has a VERY strong case for a lawsuit with very significant damages. If I were him I would be going after that Judge's bond if she is bonded, if not I would be going after her personal assets. These types of people never learn until they personally pay the cost.

[TheCoinGrabber]

How is this even allowed? "Malicious use of telecommunications services" is a slippery slope. I mean, anyone of us can just troll around we can get arrested for something like that.

Good thing about this is unless his comments on social media gets deleted by the platform, it's there for everyone to see and judge if the court overreacted. Also not surprised that this entire thing is also the result of court's bias towards women in custody battles.

[af_newbie]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

[TECSHARE]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

[af_newbie]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.

[BADecker]

I trust that everyone here has read the court docs in the case, yes? And understood them according to court language... legalease, yes?

[TECSHARE]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.

You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation.

Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest.

[af_newbie]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.

You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation.

Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest.

I read about his story (depression) here:
https://usareally.com/4090-a-father-who-has-lost-his-son-will-end-up-in-jail-due-to-criticism-of-the-judiciary-judge-spits-on-first-amendment

Anyway, this guy is a little boy who cannot handle his emotions.  He has psychological issues, that is for sure.
What was his 'game plan'?  To scare the judge?  Well, it worked. LOL.

[TECSHARE]

"Grieving dad jailed for repeatedly criticizing court system in Macomb County"

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county

This guy is unstable.  He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression.

Blaming a judge, WTF?  The judge was not near the baby.  The baby died because of his previous health condition.  Police found no fault.

The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others.

The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife.

This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides.  It is what it is. Baby died.  Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back.

Move on, meet another woman, make another baby.

And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you!

It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone.  Google it.

The guy is delusional blaming the judge.  The judge was not near the kid.

Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge!

Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge.  

BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond.  The law is the law.

He fucked up.  It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.

You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation.

Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest.

I read about his story (depression) here:
https://usareally.com/4090-a-father-who-has-lost-his-son-will-end-up-in-jail-due-to-criticism-of-the-judiciary-judge-spits-on-first-amendment

Anyway, this guy is a little boy who cannot handle his emotions.  He has psychological issues, that is for sure.
What was his 'game plan'?  To scare the judge?  Well, it worked. LOL.

There is zero information there supporting your assertion of psychological issues. Even if there was, since when do men lose their freedom for having depression? What the fuck is wrong with you, you are advocating essentially for the gulag system of the USSR where anyone who seeks redress from government is imprisoned for "psychological issues". He made no threats. Criticism is not a threat. Neither is listing her publicly available official contact information.

[coolcoinz]

You can't talk back to the almighty court of law. Every kid knows that. Their authority is unquestionable and their ethics and morals flawless. You little people can only answer when asked and never question any verdict or there's a punishment waiting for you.
Half a million bond for talking back to the judge means this has to be one dangerous dad. The US justice system is such a joke.